@Joyce_was_right What's your theory then clever clogs
English
Eddie Large Respecter
5.8K posts
Nothing is more blackpililng than observing rightoid daily talking points on X.
I swear they just react to every single provided news story in whatever seems to be the short-sighted win.
The whole "russian communist literature" is one.
It's obvious those lines were released that way for a reason. But of course, not thought can go into the reaction. Oh no. I'm not saying I know all the ins and the outs, but at least think for a short time before reacting.
I swear, they all know about the nudge unit, but I doubt the nudge unit cares. It makes no difference to how easy it is manage the reaction of the right is.
It's just pavlovs dogs really.
English
@tomhfh What is the debate? We stop ethnic minorities sending kids to schools or have an apartheid system? Encourage white people to have more babies? just not sure what the terms of the debate are!
English
If this trend continues and white British children are a *minority* in our schools in the next decade, that will be an astonishing and rapid development worthy of legitimate debate and consideration.
Pimlico Journal@PimlicoJournal
🚨NEW: When discussing Britain's demographic circumstances, we often look to the census. But that information tells us more about the past, than the future. To see the Britain of tomorrow, we must look to the children of today. ✍️: @charliecolecc 📖: pimlicojournal.co.uk/p/for-a-vision…
English
@truthpaladin_ There's a north east grime scene???
English
@LetcalfeLark Look if we're going to have subcontinentals here we might as well steal Izzat from them by fucking their women
English
@AryanEdLargeFan Yes, but if you're going to call yourself a "social conservative" and berrate others for not social conservativism, keep that stuff private, and if you're going to pretend to be more of a nationalist than someone, don't out then yourself as a coal-pusher.
English
Fair enough if you want all non-whites deported but if you genuinely don't find any ethnic women attractive you have the testosterone of a pensioner or you're a homosexual
Alexander Wakefield 🇬🇧 NRP@AlexWakefield27
@Cr0mwe77 >Being attracted to a non-white. So you're either a race traitor or brown. Either way, stick to posting gooner slop, you absolute sperg.
English
@timcalvert73 @johnsweeneyroar @KHarveyProctor Being lied to about the age doesn't necessarily get you off the hook. There was a case a few years ago where a lad had been shown a fake ID and he still got convicted.
English
@johnsweeneyroar @KHarveyProctor He was told the man was 21. On tape so it could be proved. But under the law at the time he was still guilty.
English
Read this.
Well said @KHarveyProctor.
Harvey Proctor@KHarveyProctor
Mr Yusuf, For the avoidance of doubt, I pleaded guilty in 1987 to an offence of gross indecency under laws that discriminated against homosexual men. The age of consent was then 21 for gay men & 16 for heterosexuals. Those discriminatory offences no longer exist. Also, the individual who was 17 was ‘wired for sound’ by Robert Maxwell’s paper. He said on the tape he was over 21. Unfortunately, there was a lacuna in the law in 1987 which provided heterosexuals with a defence. If heterosexuals believed those they had sexual relations with were of consensual age, & the jury believed this, then they could find the accused not guilty. No such defence pertained to homosexuals. If the younger person was under 21, the offence was committed. I did not realise this lacuna in the law existed until my lawyer, Sir David Napley, informed me. I then told him immediately I would plead guilty. Parliament has since recognised that these laws were unjust. Under the so-called “Alan Turing law”, people convicted of consensual homosexual offences under repealed legislation can have those convictions disregarded & pardoned as part of righting historic wrongs. Also, what I did was neither gross nor indecent. It was done in private and between consenting adults. I have never hidden any of this. What you are doing is attempting to weaponise a historic conviction under discriminatory laws to discredit me because you disagree with my views, & blind loyalty. That is your choice. My point remains unchanged: politicians should respect the police’s request not to speculate during a live murder investigation. Personal abuse is no answer to a principled argument. You are free to criticise me, & to answer a principled argument with personal abuse & character assassination - however unbecoming - but personal vilification is no substitute for civil debate. Ann Widdecombe believed in decency, free speech & the rule of law - which is why she stood by me and offered me practical, private & public support throughout my ordeals. I rather think she would have expected better.
English
@MisterRee321 There are definitely good looking black women, Africa is a big place with lots of different phenotypes
The sizeable backsides are a bonus as well
English
@AryanEdLargeFan Any? Some orientals perhaps.
But surely not any sheboons…
English
@AlexWakefield27 @Cr0mwe77 There are members of your party who have homosexual intercourse with Build a Bear employees
English
@Cr0mwe77 >Being attracted to a non-white.
So you're either a race traitor or brown.
Either way, stick to posting gooner slop, you absolute sperg.
GIF
English
Flag: Unironed
Blackshirt: Worn
Cameraman: Parkinson's Diseased
Yep, it's NRP time.
Dan@Danhitch0
Larp till the Larp becomes Real - @LukeJahn_
English
@alexmassie @1johnmacdonald Can't we just deport all of the wogs instead?
English
@1johnmacdonald Sure. But numbers are numbers and demographic realities means that things are going to have to change if you want them to stay broadly the same.
English
Good.
But only a start. The state pension age needs to rise further and faster.
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford
Millions more people face having to work until they are 68 before being able to claim their pension under plans to bring forward a rise in the state retirement age, @oliver_wright reports The state pension age is due to gradually rise to 68 between April 2044 and April 2046. It will reach 68 for those born on or after April 6, 1978 However, Treasury officials have told the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government’s fiscal forecaster, that the “current policy” is to bring the increase in the retirement age forward by at least seven years, to 2037 This would mean that about five million people who are aged between 49 and 55 at present would have to work for an additional year before being eligible for their state pension, costing them about £12,500 The decision would save the government about £6 billion a year from 2037 compared with the present timetable Last year ministers launched a review of the state pension age led by the Government Actuary’s Department and Suzy Morrissey, deputy director of the Pensions Policy Institute. It is due to make recommendations on when the pension age should rise before the government legislates for any change. Ministers have insisted no final decision has been taken However, in a response to the OBR, the Treasury said the government’s intention was to bring forward the pension age rise towards the end of the next decade The OBR said: “We assume that the state pension rises to 68 in 2037-39. The Treasury has confirmed to us that this is the government’s current policy position, rather than the legislated increase set in the Pensions Act 2007.” thetimes.com/article/b74703…
English
Yeah most people aren't willing to dress up as Thomas Shelby and prance around in public
Alek Yerbury@AlekYerbury
We do not what others can't, but what others won't.
English
@blaiklockBP Well he's not exactly a mastermind considering he got caught right away
English
Do we seriously think that some ordinary, middle aged bloke with a beer belly , a modest house and an old red banger is a mastermind, left-wing assassin?
English
@CharlotteCGill The first one is clearly from Peter Hitchens
English
This account is just left-wing propaganda masquerading as anonymous opinions no one has
Anon Opin.@anon_opin
So much hate for the Northern Line, but it's the best one.
English
@meadowprimrose You forgot the Thomas Shelby image
English
@flowerpotweller Proctor paid money to fuck a 17 year old, that's still illegal today
English
Today the two Muslims at the top of Reform have been calling Harvey Proctor “depraved” for engaging in homosexual acts and I can’t quite tell if that’s based or worrying.
Laila Cunningham@policylaila
Harvey, I’m the mum of a 17-year-old. I know how vulnerable they are. You say you believed he was over 21. That’s your account. But what I find so disturbing is that you’re still presenting yourself as the victim. No legal argument or historical revision will ever persuade decent people that this is something to defend rather than deeply regret.
English
@Charliestarliee @ceilingtwerker Indians can't even use toilets I don't think the English needed advice on how to pour cumin onto their food from them
English
@ceilingtwerker “Calling British food bad just means ur classist!” is just blatantly not true bc if it wasn’t those fucking colonizers would’ve known how to use the spices they got from entire regions of the world they destroyed and historically ruined… british ppl js can’t cook lmao
English
black americans made soul food out of slave scraps so this doesn’t actually move me at all
iggie@iggie404
a lot of "British food bad" boils down to classism
English
@CharlesHea16445 @NickDixon Lee has been about for decades lad, possibly longer than Mr Blobby
English
@NickDixon I actually prefer Mr Blobby to the current lefty comedians like Stewart Lee.
More intelligible.
English
Victoria Wood is a beloved comedian, and possibly Bob Mortimer, but not the others.
The Liz Truss lettuce was maybe funny for a minute, then became tedious bullying.
No idea what ‘hun culture’ is but I already hate it. Many people can’t stand Theroux. No one likes Mr Blobby.
English
@ReneGustoOnline @EulipotyphlaOG_ Nope, there have been cases where people have been found guilty despite there being clear evidence that they were lied to
English
@AryanEdLargeFan @EulipotyphlaOG_ Yes it does unless they’re clearly, like, six years old.
English
@harewr @chameleon7six2 @KHarveyProctor It's still illegal to hire a 17 year old prostitute, straight or gay
English
@chameleon7six2 @KHarveyProctor In England and Wales, the age of consent for heterosexuals has been 16 since 1885. For homosexuals it was 21 at the time of decriminalisation (1967), reduced to 18 in 1994, and then reduced to 16 (full equality) in 2001. Scotland and NI equalised later, but all now 16.
English
Mr Yusuf,
For the avoidance of doubt, I pleaded guilty in 1987 to an offence of gross indecency under laws that discriminated against homosexual men. The age of consent was then 21 for gay men & 16 for heterosexuals. Those discriminatory offences no longer exist.
Also, the individual who was 17 was ‘wired for sound’ by Robert Maxwell’s paper. He said on the tape he was over 21. Unfortunately, there was a lacuna in the law in 1987 which provided heterosexuals with a defence. If heterosexuals believed those they had sexual relations with were of consensual age, & the jury believed this, then they could find the accused not guilty.
No such defence pertained to homosexuals. If the younger person was under 21, the offence was committed. I did not realise this lacuna in the law existed until my lawyer, Sir David Napley, informed me. I then told him immediately I would plead guilty.
Parliament has since recognised that these laws were unjust. Under the so-called “Alan Turing law”, people convicted of consensual homosexual offences under repealed legislation can have those convictions disregarded & pardoned as part of righting historic wrongs.
Also, what I did was neither gross nor indecent. It was done in private and between consenting adults.
I have never hidden any of this.
What you are doing is attempting to weaponise a historic conviction under discriminatory laws to discredit me because you disagree with my views, & blind loyalty. That is your choice.
My point remains unchanged: politicians should respect the police’s request not to speculate during a live murder investigation. Personal abuse is no answer to a principled argument.
You are free to criticise me, & to answer a principled argument with personal abuse & character assassination - however unbecoming - but personal vilification is no substitute for civil debate.
Ann Widdecombe believed in decency, free speech & the rule of law - which is why she stood by me and offered me practical, private & public support throughout my ordeals. I rather think she would have expected better.
Zia Yusuf@ZiaYusufUK
Harvey, You pled guilty to paying a 17 year old boy for sex. When you were 39. This is “disgrace”. Given you claim to have “nothing to apologise for” I feel compelled to inform you: *this conduct is still illegal today*. You went to your party’s client press to condemn Nigel - who was also grieving for Ann - for asking questions that are now totally vindicated. All to score a cheap party political point. This is “depraved”.
English
@c_kennaugh @chameleon7six2 @KHarveyProctor Not for prostitution, what Proctor did is still illegal today
English
@chameleon7six2 @KHarveyProctor 16 is the age of consent for both sexes and for both heterosexual and homosexual activities and relationships. Hope this helps.
English
English
@chameleon7six2 @KHarveyProctor The age of consent is sixteen you moron.
English