YA5H

@willconnell246 This is crazy stuff. What is your creative process?

Made a Pixar-style animation ad for a healthy chocolate brand enemy framing is the most underused creative angle right now if you want ads like this made for your brand, send me a DM

Gemini Omni is crazy. This is one shot. One prompt. This is huge leap from any other models. Her tone, her delivery, the way she is talking is way too much realistic. Crazy times we live in.

@aaronmtrx This wont make it in todays market. Are you ragebaiting us bro.

This is what an AI Podcast AD should look like... These are the levels with #MTRXMedia... ALMOST got me thinking it was a REAL podcast AD that we produced in-house. But no, it's AI and took less than 1 hour to make.

An old brain rot that I made Is this format still going on I haven’t seen these kinda ads recently? Normal UGCs are so dead. Copy isn’t mine

@meng_dagg695 @MaxfusionAI It can be easily

@MaxfusionAI Can't be more real

The UGC creator era is long over. This is 100% AI generated. No crew. No casting. No studio. Realism is no longer the bottleneck. The brands still losing are not losing because their videos look fake. They are losing because they do not know what actually converts. Anyone can generate a video in 2026. Not everyone can make one that sells:

This video is 100% AI. Just Nano Banana + Kling and a system that actually works. No UGC models needed. Saves weeks of back and forth. Most AI video looks like AI video. This doesn’t. Why? It’s not about which tools you use. It’s the SOPs that I build. Under $3. Done in minutes. Dm if you wanna try my SOPs.

@baileysadlerai This is good shit

None of this is real. This is a skincare AD concept I made yesterday. It's getting pretty exciting...

@MaxfusionAI Did you use the same prompt for both of them? Cause I tried the same shit yesterday.

The one on the left was generated by GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 The one on the right was generated by Nano Banana + Seedance 2.0 Which one did it better?

@mikefutia GPT Images 2.0 is really doing wonders

ChatGPT Images 2.0 + Seedance 2.0 is f*cking wild 🤯 I generated this 25-second UGC ad for Barebells in under 20 minutes: creator, script, scenes, finished cut. ChatGPT Images 2.0 generates the creator. Seedance 2.0 turns it into video. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who want to test 20 UGC angles before paying $2K per creator video. If you're briefing creator agencies every week, waiting 7-10 days for one take of one variation, and paying $150–$300+ per UGC video that still misses the brand vibe... This workflow eliminates the entire loop: → Generate your creator in ChatGPT Images 2.0 → Save her as a Character Element in Seedance so her face stays locked across every scene → Save your product as a Prop Element with brand-accurate wrapper details → Write a 3-scene script in real UGC dialogue cadence → Fire each scene to Seedance 2.0 with both elements selected → Stitch in CapCut with auto-captions, no music, hard cuts only No creator briefs. No 7-day turnarounds. No $200/video platform fees. What you get: → A finished UGC ad in your brand's voice → Infinite variations of the same concept (test 10 hooks against one product in an afternoon) → A reusable creator and product Element library that scales across every ad → A repeatable workflow your team can run in 15-30 minutes I put together a full playbook with the 5-step system, every prompt template, the Seedance scene structure, and every common failure mode and how to fix it. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "UGC" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

@frankyecom This is actually peak

My V5.1 Realism Framework Simplicity executed perfectly will always outperform complexity done poorly. I’ll take video made in 30-minutes at a $50 CPM over a 2-minute “single prompt” clip at $300+ CPMs… but they don’t tell you that part 🤣

@ZedNilm1 This is solid work ngl

$70k+/month products are being sold with ads like this a cartoon “moisture” living inside a wet boot weird? yes but you instantly get the problem that’s the point no long explanation no technical breakdown just visualizing the pain in 1 second this is why animated ai ads are printing right now they make invisible problems obvious and obvious problems easy to sell i broke down how to create these step by step rt + comment “moisture” and i’ll send it (follow for dm)

An AI UGC ad like this costs $5,000+. I made it for under $5. And it doesn’t look like AI slop. My workflow. My SOPs. GPT Image 2 + Kling. You get a studio level ad. It’s actually this easy when you know what you’re doing. Studio time. Lighting setup. Videographer. Editor. Revisions. Weeks of back and forth. This one: under $5. Done in 15 minutes.

@Camicees This is facts

The secret to realistic AI UGC isn't the model. It's the source. Here's how I made a taste test ad in 6 minutes that looks like it was shot on an iPhone 🧵

@NahFlo2n Good shit

$60k–$140k/month ad accounts are running creatives like this not people not creators not typical ugc formats just objects and body parts turned into characters bones reacting muscles struggling food “interacting” inside your body you see the problem instantly you feel the solution right after no explaining no educating just showing that’s the advantage one strong visual does everything ai lets you build dozens of these fast same idea remixed into endless variations that’s why they scale so aggressively rt + comment “objects” and i’ll send the framework (follow for dm)

Nano Banana just got dethroned. By GPT Image 2. I switched from Nano Banana to GPT Image 2. Here's what nobody is talking about. Same Kling pipeline. Same prompt. Different image input. The output is not the same. Nano Banana + Kling — clean, gets the job done. GPT Image 2 + Kling — sharper, better texture, more realistic UGC. The real lever was never the video model. It's the image you feed it. Left — Nano Banana. Right — GPT Image 2. Which looks better to you?

Made a Zack D Films style animated ad using AI. A studio version of this: $5,000+. Weeks of back and forth. Animators, revisions, render time. This one: under $10. Made it 2 months ago with no SOP. Took 5 hours. Now I have the system locked. Better quality in 2 hours, from nothing. AI UGC is the future. You adapt or you get left behind. Most people are still figuring out the tools.

It’s crazy how easy it is to make well performing statics now. Took me 15 mins. @sleepyowlcoffee