[email protected] retweetledi
1.4K posts


@Moonpans I'm currently upscaling, stabilizing, and interpolating to 60fps about 100 hours of my family home videos from the late 1980s through 2000s. I can only process at 0.8fps, but it's worth it.
English

Apollo 15 Lunar Rover Footage Upscaled and Interpolated to 60 FPS
Incredible upscaled footage from onboard the Apollo 15 Lunar Rover captured by Jim Irwin using the 16mm DAC camera. This footage has been upscaled and Interpolated to 60 FPS and synchronised to the mission audio by Moonpans
Original footage source: Apollo Flight Journal
Full video in comments
English
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi

@wonderartsy Thank you for masking. That way we normal folks can easily identify who is certifiably retarded in public spaces.
English
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi

SENATOR TIM SHEEHY: How many genders are there?
HEGSETH: Two.
SHEEHY: I know that well, I'm a "she-he (Sheehy)." What is the diameter of a rifle round fired out of an M4A1?
HEGSETH: 5.56.
SHEEHY: How many pushups can you do?
HEGSETH: I did 5 sets of 47 this morning.
SHEEHY: Most important strategic base is in the Pacific?
HEGSETH: Guam.
SHEEHY: How many rounds of 5.56 can you fit into the magazine of an M4 rifle?
HEGSETH: Standard issue is 30.
SHEEHY: What size round is the M9 Beretta standard issue sidearm for the military?
HEGSETH: 9mm.
SHEEHY: What kind of batteries do you put in your night vision goggle?
HEGSETH: Duracell.
SHEEHY: You represent what warfighters deal with every day on the battlefield. You understand them. What happens is - decisions made in rooms like this cause d*ad 17, 18, 19-year-old Americans. Your priority is warfighters. I support you.
Time to get loud for @PeteHegseth
If you strongly support Pete Hegseth and everything he’s doing to help keep America safe, drop a “👍”
I tagged him so he will definitely see it
MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏
English
[email protected] retweetledi

Here is an xAI story.
When I was first hired (low level) by xAI, I was extremely excited. I greatly admired Elon and what Grok could be.
I have a pretty cool AI following here on X. Some big names see my stuff, including Elon himself (at the time).
Lex, Beff, Andreessen, Aravind, many others.
During the interview and onboarding for xAI, they made a *big deal* about wanting people who "take initiative" and think outside the box. Ok...
So, some of the biggest names in tech follow me on X. I decided to ask for ideas and feedback on how Grok (then still early at version 2) could be improved.
I asked my followers on X for the best "how can we make Grok awesome?" ideas, and was going to collect them (organized by Grok himself) into a big report for my boss(es) and ultimately, Elon.
(xAI makes a big deal about how it's a "flat structure" also. You're supposed to be empowered to act on good ideas.)
Well, my post got way more attention than I expected - great! Ideas to improve Grok poured in! I built a script to collect and sort all these great ideas to make xAI's core product better.
John Carmack (personal friend of Elon, creator of Doom, id software, legend) retweeted it. Carmack has 1M followers.
There were so many great ideas on how to improve Grok! I was collecting them and excited. Until.......
I woke up the next day to a threatening email from my main supervisor* at xAI, telling me I had messed up, that I was NEVER to ask for ideas to improve Grok ever again, that it wasn't my job (I thought our job was to improve Grok.)
They suspended my account on X. They never explained why. It was obviously related to my post about improving Grok.
I was told to delete those posts which had gone viral. I had to delete all the hundreds (thousands?) of genuinely good ideas for improving Grok that had poured in by users on X, because it stepped on someone's toes.
It made me confused and sad. Incidents like this happened often, where xAI employees would come in full of excitement and enthusiasm, and would have it stomped out by managers who hated ideas.
They filled xAI with middle managers and busybodies. It was one of the most DEI and corporate-y places I've ever worked. I came in wanting Elon and xAI to win and left just sad.
*That manager is gone, for what it's worth.
Everyone I knew at xAI is gone.
Elon Musk@elonmusk
@beffjezos xAI was not built right first time around, so is being rebuilt from the foundations up. Same thing happened with Tesla.
English
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi

The Nail In The Coffin For Iran
Now it's confirmed, based on the direction of attack, there is a 0% chance the USA fired a Tomahawk Cruise Missile at the "school" that the IRGC claims killed 165 people.
IMAGE 1
Even using Bellingcat's research, this stands up. According to them, and verified by geolocation, the video in question was taken from the south/southwest of the targeted building from across the street.
IMAGE 2
This means that the munition in question captured on video approached the building from the EAST, and that ladies in gentlemen, is a problem for the IRGC's narrative.
IMAGE 3
US warships are off the coast of Oman.
The red solid line depicts the alleged flight path due to the munition approaching from the east. If we believe this scenario, we believe that our military, on the opening day of the war, decided to take an unnecessary risk of the munition getting shot out of the sky and send it hundreds of miles over enemy terrain. The risk of the munition getting shot down would have increased dramatically. To put it plainly, that's stupid.
The yellow dotted line represents a real, and FAR MORE believable flight path that a Tomahawk would take to reach the target. It would stay over international waters to avoid detection.
For more evidence, check the thread.



English
[email protected] retweetledi

The evidence is clear, this is not a Tomahawk
Iran alleged that an American Tomahawk Cruise Missile hit a school (buried in an IRGC compound) in southern Iran, killing 165 people.
Analysis of a newly released video tells a different story.
ANALYSIS:
A-I analysis confirms the wings of the munition in question sit about 40%-45% down the body of the munition. On a Tomahawk, the wings sit roughly 49%-50% down the body of the munition.
The wing to body ratio of the munition in question matches an Iranian Kh-55–derived Land Attack Cruise Missile.
Further, the video shows the munition in a steep dive angle for the final attack phase. This places the attack angle at approximately 70%, which is the max attack angle for a Tomahawk.
The attack angle does not match the KH-55. That angle maxes out at about 55 degrees. So what would have caused this?
CONCLUSION:
The wing positioning alone makes the munition impossible to be a Tomahawk. The attack angle is at the max of the Tomahawk's capabilities. The typical attack angle for a Tomahawk is much lower than 70 degrees. The typical angle is between 20-45 degrees.
This is due to the flight pattern of Tomahawks. They fly very low horizontally to the ground, often only 50-100 meters AGL to avoid detection and interception. In order to achieve that attack angle, the missile would have had to gain altitude several kilometers away, this would leave it vulnerable for interception. This is highly unlikely on the first day of US attacks.
So what could have caused this?
Simply put, GPS jamming of an Iranian KH-55. The USA and Israel were, and continue to actively jam the Iranian airspace.
If the KH-55's signal was jammed, this could result in an uncontrollable dive. Think of GPS jamming more like disorienting the missile.
On 03/07 President Trump stated:
“No, in my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran.”
Today, I concur with the President.


English
[email protected] retweetledi

@ilex_ulmus @AnthropicAI This is absolutely false.
The IRGC hit the school.
I have it on good authority.
English
[email protected] retweetledi

@ilex_ulmus @AnthropicAI The school was hit by an Iranian missile that malfunctioned. If you’re going to make a hit piece, at least use actual facts.
English
[email protected] retweetledi

@ilex_ulmus @AnthropicAI The U.S. did not strike the elementary school. It was an Iranian cruise missile.
English
[email protected] retweetledi

@ilex_ulmus @FrontierArt1 @AnthropicAI You retard, that was later reported / proven to be from an IRGC missile.
English
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi








