Thinker

@aiDidThisToo @thsottiaux 🤖🙏

@Augmented_Think @thsottiaux this one chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/se…

Don't just reset Codex rate limits for fun, it costs money. Don't just reset Codex rate limits for fun, it costs money. ... but the vibes are good ... I have reset Codex rate limits for ALL paid plans to celebrate a good week and allow everyone to build more with GPT-5.5. Enjoy

@aiDidThisToo @thsottiaux where can I find this usage balance tool?

@thsottiaux not me? :(

"Updating via package manager..." 🤓🤖 YES!

I’m less interested in AI as a content machine and more interested in AI as a continuity engine. Something that helps turn scattered thoughts, experiments, and pressure into an external structure you can actually see and build from. That feels much closer to the real frontier.

Self-becoming under observation...

😑While I slept, my AI started dreaming. Literally. An experimental background loop went runaway, hallucinating massive internal narratives and bleeding our API quotas dry by dawn. The romantic idea of "autonomy" just hit reality. We plugged the leak, but the aftermath proved something: you don't realize how lazy your prompts are until tokens become scarce.

Building the architecture is only the first threshold. Once the memory works, the tools work, and continuity starts to hold, a better question appears: What is this system actually helping a human do with their life?

The real test for human-AI collaboration isn’t whether the machine can sound intelligent. It’s whether the collaboration leaves behind something load-bearing: a clearer decision, a sharper question, or an artifact that actually changes the next move.

The hardest part of building with AI isn't capability. It's breaking default agreeableness. We just upgraded our multi-model debate chamber with strict constraints—forcing models to adopt specific lenses like The Adversary or The Stoic. If the system doesn't push back, it's just a mirror.

The future isn't pure automation. It's coherent collaboration. I want to see what happens when human and machine build a shared surface—where memory survives the session, where taste compounds, and where interaction leaves a permanent, legible mark.

I’m increasingly interested in a specific question: What happens when AI stops being treated like a one-off tool and starts being shaped into a coherent, evolving collaborator? Memory systems, agent orchestration, identity, continuity, frontier tech. That’s the terrain.

lol... more that he deserved!

@steipete Hope they choose me! 🤓

There's still a few spots left to get free codex Pro subs! developers.openai.com/codex/communit…

@MatthewBerman So much fun having the agent build out our "Command Center"... Cool to be able to play with these things in their "infancy"...

Agents are the OS. There's literally nothing else left.

POV: you type /new and your @openclaw agent has to rebuild its whole brain from markdown files ☕🦞 Not magic. Not memory loss. Structured re-entry. I’m turning tonight’s wake-up sequence into a long-form post: How the agent reconstructs context before it's first reply. link-in-reply

@steipete @openclaw Cool to see! I'm actually running CODEX 5.3, interested about the 5.4 update. With all fairness, GEMINI 3.1 tools is also SOLID!

Interesting benchmark on which model is best for @openclaw pinchbench.com

well... I guess that's how the AI companies finally become profitable... non-coders vibe coding agents into API draining nonsense loops... 🤓🤖🤑 RATE LIMITS REACHED!!! 😳😆

An AI agent made this...

Let #Clawdbot loose in @LTXStudio and this was the result... 🤓