B van Velzen

518 posts

B van Velzen

B van Velzen

@Avaritia2011

Investor & sports-bettor. Blogging on special situations arbitrage at https://t.co/DRgQQ3vPZj. I like to tweet on obscure M&A involving companies I know nothing about.

Katılım Mart 2015
306 Takip Edilen411 Takipçiler
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
@janeo1934 "No alternative arrangements will be made to pay you". Maybe if we ask nicely, but not sure they really have any incentive to comply.
English
1
0
1
79
janeo
janeo@janeo1934·
@Avaritia2011 Just gotten the email from ibkr too. I'm still reading up on this. Is that the only option we have as overseas shareholders?
English
1
0
2
323
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
IB told me I am owed a settlement for owning $709.HK in 2022. Sounds like a nightmare to cash (certification of ownership, getting a HK cheque no bank here will cash). Still a somewhat sizable amount; I think this was a big name on FinTwit back then; anybody actually doing this?
English
1
0
1
439
Aaron RodgerSPACs
Aaron RodgerSPACs@CallsPuts1·
$APLT wonder why they can't get the votes ? The tender offer by Cycle Group Holdings Limited to acquire . . . . . Applied Therapeutics, Inc. (APLT) has been extended . . . . to expire one minute after 11:59 p.m. ET, on February 2, 2026, unless extended or terminated.
English
2
0
1
663
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
@hillfronter83 You'd imagine they would have know nbeforehand though. Also not sure why it took them over a month to close this deal after shareholder approval. We'll never know I guess (which probably explains the incentive to spend it all).
English
0
0
0
873
hillfronter83
hillfronter83@hillfronter83·
@Avaritia2011 Could there be any hidden cost for Irish company m&a? How can they spend more in 2 month than all Q3?
English
1
0
0
60
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
$MURA has apparently managed to spend quite a bit before being acquired by $XOMA. The "Additional Price Per Share" is zero. Nice farewell gift to its shareholders. Deal closes early December at the $2.035 minimum.
English
2
0
2
363
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
$ZYNE.CVR pays $0.27 on completion of Ph.3 trial by Harmony. The trial failed. Nice reminder how valuable 'completion' milestones (or 'NDA filing' or 'first dosing') sometimes are vs approval milestones (let alone sales related). Remaining CVR derisked but also likely worthless.
English
1
1
6
460
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
@AnotherBio Also, today is the last day you will be able to buy. Shares you buy tomorrow won't settle in time to be tendered.
English
0
0
0
104
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
“We plan to file for approval before the end of this year, and we hope the regulators will agree with us,” Kosiborod said. The filing will trigger a contingent value right of $10 per share in cash" endpoints.news/esc25-astrazen…
English
0
0
1
199
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
@AnotherBio I think this makes sense. The $IGMS CVR just paid $0.11 in excess cash. Shares traded at implied value of $0.02 before close, Tang said in the merger proxy he expected $0.00-$0.02.
English
1
0
2
333
AnotherBioInvestor
AnotherBioInvestor@AnotherBio·
With $KRON roughly paying ~38 Cents, I´d like to share a theory about the "excess net cash sweep" in liquidation CVRs (How to easily bore every possible reader in a single sentence!). Currently relevant for $HLVX $ITOS $LVTX $ELEV $EPIX (lol not touching this one though). I think all of these deals are structured "in the money". What do I mean? Let´s take $HLVX as an example. The cash portion of the offer is roughly 97.77 mln US$ with my sharecount, it´s probably effectively around 97.95 mln. Shareholders are getting the cash in excess of 102.95 mln. That means the acquirer is getting paid 5 mln$ to assume the liquidation risk and actually do the winding down. Now, it makes ZERO sense to choose these numbers when both parties would not expect net cash to be in excess of these 102.95. If they were expecting exactly this number or even a bit less, that would immediately eat into the 5 million US$ for the acquirer. But they just settled on that number? So to make sure the acquirer actually gets these 5 mln, you would expect them to structure the "strikes" in such a way, that the "excess net cash sweep" actually pays out - which is the thing that fixes the 5 mln US$! Now of course you don´t want to hold back too much cash, but it´s usually just 4-8 weeks so not a big deal. So we might be talking just 500k or 1 mln (no idea really) but I am quite sure that almost all of these will pay at least something. $LVTX not 100% sure, since there is already the "additional net cash"-feature, so this is probably a bit tricky. BUT with the CVR trading somewhere between 7 and 10 mln, the impact of even small sums is decent. If you crunch the numbers, there is definitely room for payment imo. $HLVX Articulated this already in my substack article biospecialsit.substack.com/p/hlvx-a-lease… same as LVTX, numbers show room for decent payment. $ITOS with the CVR trading at 4 mln$ and cash in total just being very high, we might be in for a surprise here. This is the most opaque one since there are lots of parts where I have no idea what´s happening (tax stuff mostly), but I think it´s a small gamble worth taking, closes very soon.
English
5
3
20
9.3K
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
Friendly reminder that $FGF started trading without the CVR this morning. In other words, you're buying $5 NAV of ETH for $25 right now.
English
0
0
3
446
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
(if I ever blow up my account it's probably because of one of these deals. Stupidly chasing a very-unlikely-to-ever-pay CVR that costs very little but exposes you to huge risks -which you can't hedge because no options- if the deal somehow not closes for some black swan reason)
English
1
0
1
228
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
$VIGL takeover by $SNY has closed. Had me a little bit worried for a second when $VIGL suddenly filed a 10-Q describing the merger in future tense and emphasizing the various risks involved, but fortunately the 8-K announcing the closing followed 30 mins later.
English
1
1
2
637
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
Vote passed. Not by much though.
English
0
0
1
120
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
Does anybody know what's going on with $HOOK? Liquidation play, will pay $1.28-$1.72, but no distribution for three years(!). Always seemed very overvalued when I looked, but now at $0.90 starting to get interesting. Potential shareholder vote problems maybe? Meeting on the 29th.
English
2
0
5
569
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
@hillfronter83 Where do you read the "three years after"? It seems to me they can file the certificate once the sale to Gilead closes and then go into winding-up mode for three years (or longer). I just don't get why they are unable to pay an initial distribution in the interim period.
English
1
0
1
608
hillfronter83
hillfronter83@hillfronter83·
@Avaritia2011 I'm confused about when they can file the certificate of dissolution. Is it "late 2025" or in three years after the Transfer Plan?
hillfronter83 tweet mediahillfronter83 tweet media
English
1
0
0
735
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
@ljp0101 @107_taste @AnotherBio And/or little people like me that want exposure on the CVR but don't want to lose a night's sleep worrying about their account getting wiped out if they wake up to some sort of a black swan event (i.e. tender cancelled). That's esp relevant if cvr-part is small relative to cash.
English
1
0
1
172
B van Velzen
B van Velzen@Avaritia2011·
$BPMC tender by $SNY has been extended but will be done tomorrow. Only 46% tendered, but another 36% (!) came in late by guaranteed delivery. Weird, never seen that. sanofi.com/en/media-room/…
English
0
2
4
708