Ayzhin

@metasal @HumphreyFirst @SebMontgomery Realistically, that's nowhere near enough. 0.01% on $1B is only $100k. That doesn't even pay for a single dev's salary. Servers for Solana nodes cost thousands of dollars a month, and Phantom would need multiple to handle the loads that they experience.

Happy with this also. The point being the number should be heading towards 0. Charging a percentage on a service that is not based on more or less work performed like tradfi is garbage. If the risk is higher, the cost is higher, the fee is justified. Credit cards have insurance. CEX have compliance.

CT Drama: Phantom Swap Fees! I can write this and attack, but have higher engagement, and so teach more people.... Or, I can be my nice self, and tell a story and educate. I will be nice BUT if this doesn't engage, I will use the other method, in the future. Today, I see 3 posts talking about how @phantom and @solflare_wallet take swap fees. Clearly a lot of people didn't know this, and haven't learnt how to read the UI. I have read the tweets, and some comments, and have a very different view. First up, we have @idrawline x.com/idrawline/stat… Then we have @cloudz x.com/FamousCloudzz/… Then we have @FabianoSolana x.com/FabianoSolana/… And some metrics, which are not correct. Jupiter wasn't integrated into Phantom in 2021. It took many months after I left Phantom, and I pinged team members on the importance of getting it in. I think it was added Q3 2022. However, it used Raydium, and fees were turned on end of Q3 or Q4 2021. The slippage on Raydium was bad at times, so very pleased Jupiter was added. Background I worked for @phantom , did their support, from May 2021 to Dec 2021. 30k users to 1.5million. Without Phantom, Solana's success would not have been anywhere near where it got to. Sollet wouldn't have made many come. However, @solflare_wallet was building well, so we would still have had some success, but not as much. What are the fees from the wallets? Solflare is 0.8% Phantom is 0.85% As for @fusewallet they may be 0%. But, they are new, and haven't stood the test of time. I used Phantom, until May 2024. I switched to Solflare because I realized 1 wallet per blockchain was vital, and Phantom has spread it's resources to ETH, Polygon, Monad, BTC, and SOL. This means new features on Solana, like Core NFTs, are not integrated as fast. If you like that, fine. But as more of a power user, Solflare is king on Solana, and their swap fees are lower. Even for normal users, it's a better Solan wallet. Why charge fees? Wallets can't have no revenue. You think worldwide servers, and beefy RPCs, and audits, and devs, and stuff can be covered with a donation link or something? The current state? We have the shittiest experience with pump.fun rugs, siphoning attention from brilliant dapps. 10,000s of people losing out to a small cabal essentially psyoping you into these crap tokens. Well, 99.9999% of them. Yet, the people who have been here since 2021 are being attacked? My Honest Views You like something, you get value, you should support it, in a way that people can actually pay their staff. Now, if I have to swap $10,000 into something, I go direct to jup.ag But smaller swaps, of course I support Solflare. Brilliant wallet, and it routes via Jupiter too. If people can't make that realization and think them losing a couple of $ a week, like probably less than $5 or $10, is worth us not having nice things.... then, damn...we are done for. Backpack 0% Fees Soon? If you want to use Backpack, go for it. I had faded Mad Lads, and that stopped late last year. But, logic people! Armani and the team are gigabrains. Most of their bandwidth is on the exchange. That is where their revenue is. The wallet isn't as good as Phantom or Solflare, and it is still supporting more chains, so anything new on Solana will be on the backburner. Either way, they need to make revenue so ofc their exchange should receive the effort. It's not for me. I can't try the exchange either, as it's not in Europe. But Jupiter doesn't make much money from the wallets @JupiterExchange is legit. @weremeow is legit, and when I had dev questions early on, Phantoms own devs, were too busy to help me, and @PierreArowana from Jup, would help me. The best team on Solana, and possibly all of crypto. meow's vision is the ecosystem grows. They take a tiny share from the commission partners takes. But, that's not the goal. Jup perps will grow to be massive. That will generate $100s of millions in revenue in the future I think. DCA and Limit Orders generate income, and these things are valuable to Jupiter. Jupiter has kept afloat these big partners, and Jupiter are GOATED for doing so. And if they didn't, then we would have rubbish wallet's like other chains have/had (some are getting better). What is the damn point Seb? Dapps, apps, wallets, etc. need revenue or they close up shop, and head home. Support your wallet, try out @solflare_wallet imo too, and stop pouring millions to rugs in memecoin land. You remember the $WATER presale was $41,000,000.... And there was over $100 million in presales in a few weeks circa May of the most rubbish memecoins ever. You have probably lost $1000s on the pure rubbish. So don't be a clown and not support the wallets that make it all possible. If you want to live the life of no swap fees, go learn CLI, and give up your wallet. But I want a bigger Jupuary Airdrop? We don't know what will give us more $JUP in Jan 2025. Some think swap volume won't be a major factor. Perps, Limit Orders, DCA, Value Average, voting, POAPs, etc. could be the actual thing. Some people think they got less JUP in Jan 2024 by using Phantom and Solfare. You got more, because you had more chances to swap. If you opened a wallet on your phone, and saw $GMT pumped, you probably swapped it. However, I don't know when Solflare integrated jupiter routing. I would assume before Phantom though. If you used Solflare, or Phantom, or even DeFi Land's Jup swap (they were the first to have Jupiter integrated) then you got more Jupiter swap volume. Conclusion Support those that support us. Don't piss away your gains on rubbish memecoins plays Dream bigger than saving 80cents on a $100 swap :)

@0xTDG @0xdpk Don't think I've ever seen someone post leveraged longs on so many different coins.

@0xdpk Prodits from sol long are here:

Update Not going great 🙂‍↕️

@SilvXBT The wallet that's up already had millions to begin with, so the person that got rich was already rich before WIF, and he talks like the money came from nowhere. The $100m got extracted from thousands of other people that are down, likely many being his followers.

one single dude is up €230.0m off of EuroMillions & yall crying on here about me talking about lottery tickets, fuck are yall talmbout lmao

@beaniemaxi @blknoiz06 How else will he get the CA first?

@blknoiz06 Come on now. There’s not even a 0.1% chance he is trying to launch any token that isn’t a scam. He’s also mentally deranged. So why even engage?

@DipSniper @astekz @RollbitUK They have KYC requirements as well, but honestly, the bigger thing investment-wise is that it would mean that Rollbit's numbers are very unlikely to be fraudulent as many people seem to suspect, as UK gambling licenses are much more regulated than Rollbit's current licensing.

@astekz @RollbitUK Can’t people just use a VPN like arent UK people already using it? Kinda like most exchanges peeps just find work arounds i thought

@TLTSYT @Paceswiftyy @Roobet @CSGO500 As Past mentioned, this is only half true. Providers have different variations of the game, 96.5%, 92%, 88%, 80%, etc. Exact numbers vary. Nearly all top casinos choose the top RTP option of 96.5%, but Roobet (as of a year ago), is one of the few that chose a lower, 92% option.

@TLTSYT @Paceswiftyy @Roobet @CSGO500 Isn't Roobet lower RTP though? I haven't checked it out really in the past year or so, but I recall them having slots set at significantly lower RTP with 92% or so, whereas all other competing casinos ran 96.5%. $7500 on $23k lost is also very low if you're running at RTP.

@Esxhibiki @styxerino @rollbitcom @styxerino Ayzhin loyalty bonus wen.

@ThinkingBitmex @rollbitcom Had to make back my liquidations somehow.

May have to start trading Rollercoaster on @rollbitcom if volatility doesn't come back soon Some degens are printing the last 24 hours

71,746,581.83 RLB burned 🔥 ~10 months ago we migrated RLB from Solana to the Ethereum network. Throughout that time we’ve experienced major growth for both Rollbit and RLB, and expanded our community considerably. Today marks the day where our SOL RLB migration phase has officially closed and any SOL RLB unaccounted for has been burnt on Ethereum. This is an important milestone for RLB, furthering our goal of increased transparency and allowing new holders and potential listing partners to better understand the RLB supply distribution. On this note, we’d like to provide additional clarity around RLB as we can’t deny the effectiveness of relentless FUD campaigns mostly peddled by grifters with ulterior motives or from misinformed people who haven’t done any research into our business: - From our expected revenues, we burn 10% of Casino, 20% of Sportsbook and 30% of Futures - Our Buy & Burn program is fully on-chain and verifiable. RLB is bought through Uniswap and burned on-chain every hour - Almost the entirety of the initial 5B RLB supply was airdropped to Rollbot holders (Rollbit’s NFTs) - 2.33B (47%) of the initial 5B RLB supply has been burned to date - We have never sold a single RLB to any VC or OTC despite the significant interest - Rollbit has generated $480MM in expected revenue since we introduced Buy & Burn 10 months ago - Rollbit’s revenue isn’t directly verifiable due to the centralised nature of our platform. However, our on-chain transaction metrics can be cross referenced and compared to our competitors which should further confirm the size of our business and provide more validity around our numbers - @Duneanalytics & @Tanzanite_tc are good sources We appreciate everybody's continued support. We'll continue delivering value to our holders and building the best experiences for our players. - Team Rollbit

@crypto_condom Tried to wire a decent sum to investment account a few months ago and ended up taking a week or so to finally get the money. Missed out on easy 5 figures because of the delay. Always a great feeling.

I fucking hate the banks. Every fucking one of them. I tried to wire a smol amt today for a business purchase. My bank account & wire were frozen. I was told I have to show ID at the bank & explain where & why I want to wire my own money. This is why crypto will win. Fuck the banks.

@ThorHartvigsen @hero_truck Some notable past sellers (Known to have large stacks prior to price pump): 1) Flood (Unsure how much he sold, but had 50m+, potentially 100m+) 2) Jezebel (40m+) 3) GamdomHowly (30m+) 4) Cougar Fox (25m) 5) Mando (10m+) Many others with large stacks who aren't actively selling.

@hero_truck What are their conclusions?

$RLB price action continues to be a mystery. $350m FDV with: - $691m annualized revenue (reported, not verifiable) - Significant token burns (verifiable, see bottom of image) 45% of the entire token supply is burned to date. At current revenue rates, 33% of the remaining liquid supply is burned per year (912m tokens annually). The bottom three lines of the image show an example of how the burning works: 1. reported on Rollbit 2. corresponding ETH is swapped for RLB on Uniswap 3. corresponding RLB sent to null address (burned) But the token is not pumping despite these massive buybacks due to heavy selling. Who's selling? It's difficult to tell. Maybe early whales/investors. Maybe the team. Maybe a combination. It's hard to analyze as the Rollbit exchange is centralized and non-transparent. There is also missing some clarity about the transition from Solana to Ethereum last year in which all the tokens were minted again. One would think that at some point, these buybacks would have an impact on the price. But who knows when that'll happen (if ever).

@crypto_condom @mesquka Cats >>>

@mesquka Man that’s a great shot. Well done

@Pier_Army @Izzybelleth @DEXToolsApp Revenues are definitely real. I alone have lost over $200k gambling on Rollbit in the past week or so. You can see deposits/withdrawals to Rollbit on-chain wallets and they line up closely with Stake's court-mandated revenues percentage-wise.

So let’s say there is a token - The token market cap is worth 270 million dollars. The entity it represents does around 700 million in revenue. You know that there is going to be 100 million dollars worth in buys over a year. Furthermore - these buys wouldn’t just be buy pressure, but also burning said token and reducing the supply by just over 30 percent in a year. You would assume this would be a good buy. This is the case for $rlb @rollbitcom . The earlier attention that Rlb gathered faded as everyone went shooting for memes and ai. Meanwhile, rollbit has continually grown and every hour more rib is bought and burned. Everyone says they don’t like tokens with 0 utility and bad tokenomics/shit fdv. Rollbit buys back and burns existing tokens each hour from real revenues. Rlb is 100 percent in circulation, and the token was fairly dropped. At some point as long as revenues keep up, mathematically it has to go up. It’s simply the most undervalued token currently.

@styxerino @SmokeyLisa_tc @Tanzanite_tc Probably not possible. Live bet feeds are rate limited so not all bets get displayed, otherwise some feeds would move way too rapidly to be a good experience visually.

After receiving feedback from our followers, we have added more casinos to the @Tanzanite_tc dashboard. What other metrics would you like to see?

"Rollbits numbers are fake, the buyback and burns arent real". If you still believe this, take a look at tanzanite.capital You can see some numbers that may surprise you. Just eth deposits alone last month equated to over 160 million USD. And thats not counting BTC, Sol etc... Assuming a drop rate of 35 percent (this generally is what retail brokers work off of) and you get a very healthy business and a token that is super undervalued $RLB @rollbitcom

@smbguyai @EngineeringFI_ @BowTiedDaddy The 0.075% seems accurate, but this is a worldwide figure. For America it would be far higher. You go to India, Africa, etc and the number will be far lower.

@EngineeringFI_ @BowTiedDaddy Lol it's not but the 0.075% figure is absurd That's ~121,000 men in America There's 81,000 college football players alone, almost all of which can rep 225 lbs on bench

Lifting on military installations gives you a massively skewed perspective on how much weight you should be able to lift. You walk into the gym on Camp Alpha on Bagram and you would get laughed out if you weren’t repping 225. You could go on any give day at any given time and see 405 for 8-12 clean reps.

🚨 Exposing the Dark Side of the Casino Industry youtu.be/X7-Bp5XHQWY

@rollbitcom RSOR?

We bet you can't spell a word using the letters available.