

BB1977
166K posts

@BB19775
Truth seeker. Catholic. I block and report all spam, impersonation, crypto folks, alleged lottery winners, and salacious followers. 🇺🇸






Labeling mainstream conservative organizations as “hate groups” while ignoring real extremists is reckless and dangerous.




Charging the Southern Poverty Law Center with a federal crime for paying informants to help dismantle hate groups is an outrageous weaponization of the Dept of Justice and the FBI. As someone who has been a prosecutor and has taken on the Klan I can tell you that use of paid informants is a common tactic used to dismantle drug cartels, the mob and extremist groups on both the right and the left. It is clear that all civil rights organizations are in the cross hairs of this Administration and that folks, puts everyone at risk.

Elon Musk has been warning for years now that the SPLC is a scam and a criminal organization Elon has been right the whole time

8 hate group leaders — including KKK Imperial Wizard and neo-Nazi — got millions from SPLC as part of ‘informant’ scheme, DOJ says. Read today's cover here: trib.al/gl06n1w





BREAKING: The President of the New Hampshire chapter of Randi Weingarten’s union admitted they're working with the World Economic Forum to create curriculum. New Hampshire Republicans are pushing a bill to ban globalist curriculum created by the World Economic Forum.


Nikolas Bowie is the most plausible single candidate for the documentary source of the Shadow Papers. If he is not the direct source, the source is almost certainly inside his network. The Times published seven memos from the February 2016 Clean Power Plan stay deliberation. Six justices. Roberts twice. Breyer, Kagan, Alito, Kennedy, Sotomayor once each. Six of the seven look identical in format. Chambers letterhead. Initials or signature at the bottom. The seventh does not. The Sotomayor memo carries no chambers letterhead, no signature, no initials, and a date of February 16, three days after Scalia died, when every other memo in the packet runs February 5 through February 9. Either the date is a typo for February 6 and the memo was printed later on plain paper from a chambers working file, or it is a non-circulated draft Sotomayor wrote after Scalia died that never went to conference. Both readings point at one chamber. Whoever handed this memo to the Times had access to something that did not travel through the normal distribution. Sotomayor's four OT 2015 clerks were Easha Anand, Nikolas Bowie, Bridget Fahey, and Matt Shahabian. Three of them have gone quietly into appellate practice and doctrinal scholarship. Anand runs the Supreme Court litigation clinic at Stanford. Fahey teaches federalism at Chicago. Shahabian is in private practice. None has built a public career against the Court. Bowie has. For five years he has been building the most developed academic case in the country for dismantling Supreme Court power, with the shadow docket as a named reform target. His 2021 testimony to the Biden Commission called the Court "antidemocratic." His 2021 Harvard Law Review Foreword, titled Antidemocracy, runs the length of a short book in service of the same thesis. In October 2024 he co-authored a New York Times op-ed with Daphna Renan titled "The Supreme Court Has Grown Too Powerful. Congress Must Intervene." His Liveright book with Renan, Supremacy: How Rule by the Court Replaced Government by the People, lands September 15, 2026. Seven weeks before the midterms. He sits on the board of People's Parity Project. And he has not kept the playbook theoretical. In 2023, on Elie Mystal's Contempt of Court, Bowie walked through the specific mechanisms Congress could deploy to disempower the Court… jurisdiction stripping, funding control, supermajority requirements on Court orders, the entire menu. He told Mystal the obstacle is not legal but cultural. "It's just a question of what do you think you could politically do to reassert democracy." Then there is the Kantor relationship. On February 2, 2026, ten weeks before the leak, Jodi Kantor published a front-page Times piece on Chief Justice Roberts's new nondisclosure agreements. Bowie was the closing quote. "If the public were aware of how much of the deliberations affecting millions of people are made by 27-year-olds after happy hour, they'd be shocked." Ten weeks later, Kantor and Adam Liptak showed the public exactly how those deliberations happen. Days before the drop, Bowie appeared on a Harvard Law School panel titled Why I Changed My Mind, seated between Samantha Power and Yochai Benkler, moderated by Jonathan Zittrain. On that stage, in front of a live audience, he anchored himself to the exact term the leaked memos are from. "I clerked on the Supreme Court in 2016 and I was there when Justice Scalia died." Then he told the audience the Court cannot be reformed through normal means. "I'm actually probably never going to see a liberal Supreme Court in my lifetime, absent any kind of really a change from without." A change from without. Put the pieces together. A four-year Kantor-Liptak source operation running successive inside-the-Court exposures. Roberts's late-2024 NDAs covering only current personnel, leaving the 2015-era clerk cohort beyond their reach. The Dobbs investigation precedent proving the Marshal's office cannot identify leakers. Bowie's named role as Kantor's closing quote in the precursor piece. The forensic tell in the packet pointing at Sotomayor's chambers specifically. His own words days before the drop placing him in that chamber during that term. The Shadow Papers advance the Bowie-Renan-Vladeck-People's Parity Project agenda with a precision that demands explanation. In my reading, the pattern is most consistent with Bowie's involvement.

The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted for allegedly paying sources in hate groups without donors knowing. The FBI also pays informants usatoday.com/story/news/nat…