BB1977

166K posts

BB1977

BB1977

@BB19775

Truth seeker. Catholic. I block and report all spam, impersonation, crypto folks, alleged lottery winners, and salacious followers. 🇺🇸

United States Katılım Ekim 2022
715 Takip Edilen582 Takipçiler
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
The Democratic Party doesn’t merely “admire” Saul Alinsky. They worship him. Not with incense and candles, but with the cold, devotional precision of a death cult that has traded scripture for “Rules for Radicals” and replaced the cross with the clenched fist of perpetual grievance. This is no exaggeration. It is pathology dressed in designer suits, metastasized into institutional power. Alinsky...Chicago’s own community-organizer Machiavelli, the man who dedicated his seminal 1971 manifesto to Lucifer himself (“the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom”)...laid out the tactical blueprint for seizing power by any means necessary. Ridicule your opponent. Polarize. Isolate. Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules until the book itself becomes a weapon turned inward. These are not suggestions. They are commandments. And the modern Democratic Party recites them like a rosary of blood. Look at the historical bloodline with intellectual honesty, not the sanitized campus pablum they peddle: Hillary Clinton, fresh out of Wellesley in 1969, wrote her senior thesis as a love letter to Alinsky...titled, tellingly, “There Is Only the Fight.” She interviewed the man himself, flirted with becoming one of his organizers, and only pivoted to Yale Law when the power calculus shifted. Barack Obama? Groomed in the very streets Alinsky radicalized, a community organizer whose entire early career was a masterclass in Alinskyite agitation...manufacturing crises, pitting neighbor against neighbor, weaponizing “hope and change” as the velvet glove over the iron fist of demographic replacement and institutional capture. This isn’t coincidence. It is catechism. A generation of hollowed-out narcissists and ressentiment addicts filling the God-shaped void with the only sacrament that still quickens their dead hearts: raw, unadulterated power. Alinsky understood the human animal better than they admit. Strip away the moral language, he taught, and politics is simply the art of making the other side bleed while you smile for the cameras. Democrats internalized it so completely they no longer see it as strategy; they see it as ontology. Their entire worldview is Alinsky distilled into policy: divide by race, by sex, by class; ridicule tradition as “fascism”; seize the institutions (media, academia, courts, tech) and never, ever let go. The Constitution? A dead letter to be mocked. Individual liberty? A bourgeois illusion for the unenlightened. Philosophically, it is the purest expression of what Dostoevsky warned us about in The Possessed: revolutionaries who begin by promising utopia and end by worshipping the devil because nothing else satisfies the abyss. Alinsky wasn’t a liberal; he was a nihilist with organizing charts. His disciples in the DNC have perfected the art...turning every cultural wound into electoral capital, every riot into a fundraising email, every dissenting voice into an existential threat that must be canceled, deplatformed, or prosecuted. They don’t debate. They excommunicate. Because debate implies equality. And equality is the one heresy their cult cannot tolerate. This is why they froth at any pushback. Not because they fear losing an election. They fear losing the only religion that gives their empty lives meaning: the slow, sadistic strangulation of the American experiment. They are not misguided idealists. They are ideological vampires...pale, power-drunk ghouls who have feasted on the carcass of the republic for decades and now demand we thank them for the privilege of being drained. Fuck the soulless machine that treats Saul Alinsky not as a tactician, but as a dark saint whose gospel must be obeyed unto the last free breath of this nation. The fight isn’t left versus right anymore. It’s civilization versus the cult that worships its own decay. 💀⚖️🗡️
LHGrey™️ tweet media
English
61
354
802
57.7K
BB1977 retweetledi
Apple Lamps
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple·
“If his theories transition from the pages of the Harvard Law Review into the halls of Congress... as they are already beginning to do... the United States will cease to be a constitutional republic governed by the rule of law. It will become a majoritarian state where fundamental liberties... from free speech and religious exercise to the right to bear arms and own property... exist only at the sufferance of the political party currently holding power in Washington. The conservative defense of the Supreme Court is a defense of the Constitution itself against the very real, very present threat of academic dismantlement.”
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple

x.com/i/article/2047…

English
0
31
50
1.2K
BB1977 retweetledi
FBI Director Kash Patel
FBI Director Kash Patel@FBIDirectorKash·
The SPLC allegedly helped fund and facilitate the 2017 Charlottesville rally that resulted in a young woman’s life lost - and then used shell companies to hide it from the public and their donors
English
948
6.1K
24K
315.3K
BB1977 retweetledi
Brian Shortsleeve for Massachusetts
This hearing shows exactly what’s broken with the Parole Board. Being a prosecutor who stood up for victims is treated like a liability. But having a softer, activist background is rewarded. That’s an ideologically captured board. And Maura Healey either built it or allowed it to happen. I’ll clean house on Day One and appoint members who put public safety first. Read more here: zurl.co/MUT9k #mapoli #magov
Brian Shortsleeve for Massachusetts tweet media
English
0
11
22
372
BB1977 retweetledi
Libs of TikTok
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok·
BREAKING: Florida officials arrested owners of an immigration agency for allegedly running a fraudulent operation that extorted more than $20 million, promising to help illegal aliens obtain legal status. Three of the defendants are illegal aliens themselves.
Libs of TikTok tweet media
English
137
1.4K
3.2K
54.2K
BB1977 retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. The Biden DOJ didn't only PARTNER WITH the Southern Poverty Law Center while the NGO funneled $3 million to white supremacists "Then the banks flagged the fraud to the feds..." "...and the Biden White House SHUT DOWN THE INVESTIGATION." SPLC aren't the only ones who should be indicted. INVESTIGATE BIDEN'S DOJ OFFICIALS!
English
306
8.7K
23.6K
280.1K
BB1977
BB1977@BB19775·
@wesyang Having males in female prisons is a violation of ALL women’s civil rights. It is the very definition of deliberate indifference. Woman should be able to sue everyone involved in such decisions, including DOC’s, attorneys and judges who contribute to such abuse.
English
0
2
5
51
BB1977 retweetledi
Wesley Yang
Wesley Yang@wesyang·
Three of the eleven men who are incarcerated with women in one Massachusetts state penitentiary: -- A man who sexually assaulted and murdered two women, including his own cousin, whom he raped with a broom handle and stabbed more than 40 times. -- A level three sex offender imprisoned for repeatedly kidnapping and sexually a 14-year old at gunpoint -- A "sexually dangerous person" who spent 24 years in a treatment center for sex offenders and was denied parole six times for failing to demonstrate any progress.
Wesley Yang tweet media
English
34
338
863
22.1K
BB1977 retweetledi
@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸@Chicago1Ray·
This YouTuber went to the consulting firm listed under Tim Mynett, the husband of Ilhan Omar and there's no office there Watch this 🚨 Independent Journalists are nailing these crooks... arrest Ilhan Omar
English
205
10.1K
28.6K
169K
BB1977 retweetledi
BB1977 retweetledi
Hans Mahncke
Hans Mahncke@HansMahncke·
Kudos to the New York Post for being the only major outlet to get this right. The SPLC were paying the leaders. By definition, leaders cannot be informants. They run the operation. It is like paying the leader of Auschwitz to inform on who is carrying out the gassings instead of paying him to stop the gassings. It is perhaps the most grotesque, cynical, and pernicious racket ever devised. Of course, plenty of groups extract money from taxpayers and well-meaning donors off problems they inflate, but this is far worse because it breeds real hatred and manufactures racial division to keep the grift alive.
New York Post@nypost

8 hate group leaders — including KKK Imperial Wizard and neo-Nazi — got millions from SPLC as part of ‘informant’ scheme, DOJ says. Read today's cover here: trib.al/gl06n1w

English
189
3.1K
8.8K
232.3K
BB1977 retweetledi
Senator Jessica de la Cruz
Unfortunately, RI is once again on the wrong list: states with the sharpest decline in housing affordability. At +8.4%, RI ranked dead last in the country and the highest increase in total costs as a share of gross income of any state. We were already an expensive state to live in, and Democrat policies have only made it worse. The General Assembly should enact my modest tax cut (2% off the rate each year), repeal the expensive energy mandates and expedite housing developments in urban areas. We shouldn’t settle for affordability when we can aim for prosperity.
Senator Jessica de la Cruz tweet mediaSenator Jessica de la Cruz tweet media
English
20
34
88
2.4K
BB1977 retweetledi
The SCIF
The SCIF@TheSCIF·
Democrat election worker at the State Farm Arena on Nov 3, 2020 was caught running the same batch of ballots through the tabulation machine 5x in a row during the Fulton County, Georgia 2020 election.
English
71
1.5K
3.5K
41K
BB1977 retweetledi
Apple Lamps
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple·
I uploaded all of Marc Elias’s podcasts from the past six months that focus on the Supreme Court to NotebookLM. This is what it had to say... How Progressive Elites are Plotting to Dismantle the American Republic A coordinated, apocalyptic narrative is currently being pushed by prominent progressive lawmakers, legal scholars, and activists, revealing a terrifying blueprint to completely dismantle the foundational institutions of the United States. Claiming that the nation is on the "precipice of absolute tyranny," these left-wing figures are actively utilizing extreme fear-mongering to justify an unprecedented structural power grab. Under the guise of "saving democracy," this coalition is telegraphing a highly alarming agenda: delegitimizing the Supreme Court, ruthlessly weaponizing the executive branch, and eradicating state-level election integrity measures to secure permanent progressive rule. The Calculated Destruction of the Supreme Court The most immediate target of this radical movement is the United States Supreme Court, an institution the left now openly despises for adhering to the Constitution rather than bending to progressive political demands. Rather than accepting judicial outcomes they disagree with, these activists are waging a relentless smear campaign to obliterate public faith in the judiciary. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse aggressively dismisses the Supreme Court as a "captured court" controlled entirely by "right-wing billionaire barons". Echoing this dangerous contempt, Senator Richard Blumenthal has labeled the conservative majority as nothing more than a bunch of "politicians in robes," framing their lawful rulings as a national disgrace. Representative Jamie Raskin goes so far as to describe the highest court in the land as illegitimately "gerrymandered and cracked and packed". This relentless demonization is not merely rhetorical; it is the deliberate groundwork for a radical institutional takeover. Harvard Law Professor Nicholas Bowie openly suggests that if the public disagrees with the Supreme Court, Congress could simply strip the Court of its jurisdiction or artificially "change the number of justices" to secure preferred liberal outcomes. Progressive commentators like Dahlia Lithwick openly mock the concept of "American exceptionalism" and express disbelief that the United States continues to allow lifetime tenure for its highest jurists, unfavorably comparing America to other nations. To immediately enforce this ideological purge, Senator Whitehouse has explicitly proposed implementing retroactive 18-year term limits to forcibly and immediately remove sitting conservative justices from the bench. The Hypocritical Weaponization of the Justice System The glaring hypocrisy underlying this progressive agenda is most apparent in their explicit plans to weaponize the Department of Justice against their political opponents. Throughout their rhetoric, progressive figures hysterically accuse Republicans of plotting to use the federal government for retribution. Yet, progressive legal operative Marc Elias openly demands that a future Democratic president abandon institutional norms and use the DOJ as a proactive partisan weapon. Elias explicitly states that Democrats must abandon any nostalgic desire to return to the "moderate governance" of the Barack Obama or Joe Biden eras. Instead, he shockingly urges the left to learn directly from Donald Trump and "be willing to use all of the tools that he was willing to use". Elias complains bitterly that Merrick Garland's DOJ only brought a pathetic five voting cases, demanding that a new Democratic administration use the Department of Justice "proactively" to enforce progressive electoral mandates. This proves that the left's professed concern for "democratic norms" is a calculated fraud designed to disarm their opponents while they load their own institutional weapons. The Federal Erasure of State Election Integrity This authoritarian ambition extends directly into the complete federalization of the American electoral system. Progressive leaders are actively plotting to strip individual states of their constitutional authority to manage free and fair elections. Elias has shockingly suggested that Congress could bypass state legislatures entirely to enact a nationwide electoral map, enforce "proportional representation," or mandate a sweeping "nationwide pre-clearance requirement". Election law professor Nicholas Stephanopoulos similarly praises proportional representation as a "great appeal" because it practically guarantees outcomes for specific political and ethnic groups, eliminating the need for competitive litigation. Meanwhile, common-sense election security measures are hysterically maligned to justify this massive federal intervention. Representative Dan Goldman fiercely attacks the SAVE Act, a basic bill simply requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, as a malicious "voter suppression bill" and an illegal "poll tax". Goldman incredibly claims that ensuring non-citizens do not cast ballots is a "non-problem" and a mere scam designed to disproportionately impact poor and minority Democratic voters. Similarly, the progressive legal machine views standard, uniform election deadlines... such as requiring mail-in ballots to actually arrive by Election Day... as a calculated plot to disenfranchise voters, actively fighting in court to force states to count ballots arriving days after the polls have closed. Any effort to secure the ballot box or finalize a timely vote count is immediately smeared by these figures as an authoritarian effort to "stop the count" and steal an election. The Deliberate Erosion of Constitutional Checks and Balances Even the fundamental separation of powers established by the Founding Fathers is under attack. Representative Raskin bizarrely argues that the concept of three "co-equal" branches of government is a myth, famously insisting that "co-equal is not even a word". By asserting that Congress possesses ultimate, unrivaled legislative supremacy over the executive and judicial branches, the progressive left aims to bulldoze any constitutional checks on their legislative authority. Driven by apocalyptic delusions of a "totalitarian seizure of power" by the right, this coordinated progressive movement is not trying to save American democracy. By their own explicit admission, they are broadcasting their intention to shatter the independence of the Supreme Court, hijack the Department of Justice, and rewrite the rules of every election to ensure a permanent, unchallengeable progressive grip on the nation."
Apple Lamps tweet media
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple

Nikolas Bowie is the most plausible single candidate for the documentary source of the Shadow Papers. If he is not the direct source, the source is almost certainly inside his network. The Times published seven memos from the February 2016 Clean Power Plan stay deliberation. Six justices. Roberts twice. Breyer, Kagan, Alito, Kennedy, Sotomayor once each. Six of the seven look identical in format. Chambers letterhead. Initials or signature at the bottom. The seventh does not. The Sotomayor memo carries no chambers letterhead, no signature, no initials, and a date of February 16, three days after Scalia died, when every other memo in the packet runs February 5 through February 9. Either the date is a typo for February 6 and the memo was printed later on plain paper from a chambers working file, or it is a non-circulated draft Sotomayor wrote after Scalia died that never went to conference. Both readings point at one chamber. Whoever handed this memo to the Times had access to something that did not travel through the normal distribution. Sotomayor's four OT 2015 clerks were Easha Anand, Nikolas Bowie, Bridget Fahey, and Matt Shahabian. Three of them have gone quietly into appellate practice and doctrinal scholarship. Anand runs the Supreme Court litigation clinic at Stanford. Fahey teaches federalism at Chicago. Shahabian is in private practice. None has built a public career against the Court. Bowie has. For five years he has been building the most developed academic case in the country for dismantling Supreme Court power, with the shadow docket as a named reform target. His 2021 testimony to the Biden Commission called the Court "antidemocratic." His 2021 Harvard Law Review Foreword, titled Antidemocracy, runs the length of a short book in service of the same thesis. In October 2024 he co-authored a New York Times op-ed with Daphna Renan titled "The Supreme Court Has Grown Too Powerful. Congress Must Intervene." His Liveright book with Renan, Supremacy: How Rule by the Court Replaced Government by the People, lands September 15, 2026. Seven weeks before the midterms. He sits on the board of People's Parity Project. And he has not kept the playbook theoretical. In 2023, on Elie Mystal's Contempt of Court, Bowie walked through the specific mechanisms Congress could deploy to disempower the Court… jurisdiction stripping, funding control, supermajority requirements on Court orders, the entire menu. He told Mystal the obstacle is not legal but cultural. "It's just a question of what do you think you could politically do to reassert democracy." Then there is the Kantor relationship. On February 2, 2026, ten weeks before the leak, Jodi Kantor published a front-page Times piece on Chief Justice Roberts's new nondisclosure agreements. Bowie was the closing quote. "If the public were aware of how much of the deliberations affecting millions of people are made by 27-year-olds after happy hour, they'd be shocked." Ten weeks later, Kantor and Adam Liptak showed the public exactly how those deliberations happen. Days before the drop, Bowie appeared on a Harvard Law School panel titled Why I Changed My Mind, seated between Samantha Power and Yochai Benkler, moderated by Jonathan Zittrain. On that stage, in front of a live audience, he anchored himself to the exact term the leaked memos are from. "I clerked on the Supreme Court in 2016 and I was there when Justice Scalia died." Then he told the audience the Court cannot be reformed through normal means. "I'm actually probably never going to see a liberal Supreme Court in my lifetime, absent any kind of really a change from without." A change from without. Put the pieces together. A four-year Kantor-Liptak source operation running successive inside-the-Court exposures. Roberts's late-2024 NDAs covering only current personnel, leaving the 2015-era clerk cohort beyond their reach. The Dobbs investigation precedent proving the Marshal's office cannot identify leakers. Bowie's named role as Kantor's closing quote in the precursor piece. The forensic tell in the packet pointing at Sotomayor's chambers specifically. His own words days before the drop placing him in that chamber during that term. The Shadow Papers advance the Bowie-Renan-Vladeck-People's Parity Project agenda with a precision that demands explanation. In my reading, the pattern is most consistent with Bowie's involvement.

English
55
712
1.1K
37.2K
BB1977 retweetledi
Paul Mauro
Paul Mauro@PaulDMauro·
EXACTLY. Meaning: The GOVERNMENT can authorize potentially illegal activities in order to build a case. Private entities cannot. Nice try, USA Today. But as ever -- your bias is showing. And btw: the FBI can't commit bank fraud -- unless authorized for a case.
USA TODAY@USATODAY

The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted for allegedly paying sources in hate groups without donors knowing. The FBI also pays informants usatoday.com/story/news/nat…

English
54
600
2K
27.5K