BEACN

Talking with Charles was insane, he searched all over my page looking for things to interrogate me, which is fine but through me off, than his co-host started calling me names and booted me. Please take a look at who is running Cardano/Midnight and figure out if they believe him or me... (proof at the end they booted me and lie about it) Esco I think you new your co-host blocked me and I believe you, Charles and him all had a private chat going on too. You pretend to act like I ran away, what a liar!

@shaggyrax Chuck the builder vibes?

I always got racist vibes from Charles Hoskinson 🤷‍♂️

This is the contradiction people keep ignoring. Minutes before this, Charles posted about unity, governance, ownership, coordinationand being #strongertogether Prior to this @HolgerCardano24 offered a private 1-on-1 to speak like adults, the response was "Tell him to go to hell." "He's trash." The community should ask whether #stronger together is a principle or just a slogan when it only applies to people who agree

@shaggyrax Is that Charles the builder

Blue check ✔️ Token Registry in progress 🫡 Website 🔜 The documentary is coming 🗣️

@HiiiPowerRevo 🤮 He is performative, so I don't put much stock in his words. But IF he actually lost 2.5B ADA (75% drawdown from local top), that's a staggering bag. He'd sudo govern.

Sigh this is pathetic

@avaxricious @Yabba900 @yutazzz @Cerkoryn @dori_coin @adamKDean @ItsDave_ADA @NickValdez @DBCrypt0 @SECGov @CFTC @FBI

@Yabba900 @yutazzz @Cerkoryn @dori_coin @adamKDean @ItsDave_ADA @NickValdez @DBCrypt0 Honestly though, we need the @SECGov and @CFTC to look into Charles Hoskinson. Innocent people dont act this way @FBI

Charles is currently in his BitBoy Era It is sad to see but he isn’t what I once supported @yutazzz @Cerkoryn @dori_coin @adamKDean @ItsDave_ADA @NickValdez @DBCrypt0

@avaxricious @the_c0nnector @BrothershipPool @BTC_OS 😭

@the_c0nnector @BrothershipPool Bitcoin defi was supposed to happen May 2025. I remember it clearly when Charles shamed @BTC_OS for launching a token.

Charles, when every critic becomes a villain, the pattern is not everyone else. The pattern is you. You just listed Optim, Iagon, Cardano Whale, Dave, Rick, Adam and others like this is an "inventory." It is not an inventory. It is a list of people in this ecosystem who have questioned you, disagreed with you, did something you didn't like, challenged IOG, challenged a narrative or refused to act like Cardano governance exists only to ratify what you want. And instead of reflecting on why so many serious people keep ending up on the other side of your megaphone, you reach for the same playbook every time - Dismiss the substance. - Attack the person. - Recast yourself as the victim. - Then tell everyone else to "grow up." So let's take the Iagon part of your "inventory," since you brought us into it. You say Iagon "started bullying and harassing" Midnight ambassadors. That is a convenient story, but it is not what happened. I as a dRep asked a governance question, NOT Iagon. A dRep asked whether people with roles connected to Midnight or IOG linked interests, who also held meaningful dRep voting power, should abstain on IOG related treasury proposals. That is governance. That is literally what dReps are supposed to do - ask hard questions, examine conflicts, protect treasury neutrality and represent the $ADA holders who delegated voting power to them. If a person is participating in governance with delegated $ADA while also holding a role connected to a project or organization affected by that vote, asking about conflicts is not an attack. It is accountability. And let's be very clear - ambassadors are not above scrutiny. dReps are not above scrutiny. Iagon is not above scrutiny. IOG is not above scrutiny. Midnight is not above scrutiny. You are not above scrutiny. This is supposed to be decentralized governance, not a court where certain people get protected status because they are useful to Charles Hoskinson. The moment a person participates in public governance with public voting power, the public is allowed to ask public questions. You did not answer the conflict question. You reframed it as "bullying" - ironically this is exactly what you have been doing in this ecosystem. Then you escalated it into an attack on Iagon, my leadership and the holders. You used your platform to tell the market you had "no more time" for the project unless leadership changed. You warned that Iagon could fail and destroy value for token holders. You called into question the ethics and integrity my leadership. You accused us of acting out of spite rather than engaging with the actual governance concern. And then, after the damage was done, you turned around and said people are "playing the victim." That is not leadership. That is deflection. You cannot threaten a Cardano native project, watch real holders suffer, then accuse the people objecting to the threat of being childish. You cannot say you care about token holders while dismissing "your token holders" when those holders happen to be in a project that challenged you. There are no "Iagon holders" over there and "Cardano holders" over here. $IAG holders are $ADA holders. They are stake pool operators. They are voters. They are dReps. They are builders. They are community members. They are families. They are the same ecosystem you claim to defend. When you attack a Cardano project, you are not attacking some foreign body. You are attacking people inside Cardano. That is the part you keep avoiding. You talk about ambassadors being bullied. Fine. I will say this clearly - I do not condone harassment of any ambassador, volunteer, dRep, builder, SPO or community member. Anyone who crosses into personal abuse should stop. But do not use "protecting ambassadors" as a shield to make governance questions untouchable. Do not use volunteers as human armor around treasury proposals. Do not say "decentralized governance" when the rule is really - vote,but do not question my side - ask question but not about my people - participate but only if you accept the consequences of my platform turning on you. That is not governance. That is intimidation. And since we are talking about red lines, where were those red lines when Iagon was being called a scam? Where were those red lines when IOG aligned voices and consultants were smearing Iagon publicly? Where were those red lines when defamatory claims, racial slurs and personal attacks were being thrown at builders who have spent years building on Cardano? Where was the concern for "bullying" then? The standard cannot be: When your side attacks, it is criticism. When others ask questions, it is harassment. When you escalate, it is leadership. When people respond, they are victims. When you use a 1M+ follower account, it is accountability. When a dRep asks about conflicts, it is a mob. That double standard is exactly why people are speaking up. You say people "lash out, get hit hard and then play the victim." No. People ask legitimate questions. You hit hard. Then you call their injuries proof that they were wrong to ask. That is the pattern. A dRep raises a conflict of interest concern. You call it bullying. A project CEO disagrees with IOG proposals. You call it spite. A community member challenges your narrative. You diagnose them, mock them, block them or write them off. Then, when people notice the pattern, you call them children. Charles, the lack of self-reflection here is breathtaking. At some point, when the same story keeps happening with different people, different projects, different dReps, different critics,and different cycles, maybe the common denominator is not that everyone else is irrational. Maybe the common denominator is that you treat disagreement as disloyalty. Maybe the common denominator is that you confuse criticism with attack. Maybe the common denominator is that you cannot separate Cardano from yourself. That is dangerous in a decentralized ecosystem. Because Cardano does not belong to you. It does not belong to IOG. It does not belong to Iagon. It does not belong to Midnight. It does not belong to any ambassador group, any DRep bloc, any founder, any company or any whale. It belongs to the $ADA holders and the people building, maintaining, securing, voting, delegating, questioning and participating in it. And if those people cannot ask whether conflicts exist without being threatened, mocked, financially harmed or publicly targeted, then governance is not free. You said "grow up kids." Here is the adult version: Answer the question. Should dReps with roles, incentives, payments, affiliations or obligations connected to an organization seeking treasury funds disclose those overlaps and consider abstaining? Yes or no? That was the issue. Not your ego. Not my tone. Not Iagon’s existence. Not whether Midnight ambassadors are good people. Not whether Charles feels attacked. Not whether people should be afraid to ask next time. The question was about conflict, disclosure and treasury integrity. If there is no conflict, explain why. If there is a conflict, disclose it. If abstention is not necessary, make the case. If the Constitution already provides the standard, apply it equally. But do not turn a governance question into a loyalty test. Do not demand apologies for asking what every serious governance system must be willing to ask. Do not pretend you are defending decentralization while using centralized influence to punish dissent. And do not tell people to "grow up" while threatening to burn projects down. The Cardano community should be able to disagree without fear. dReps should be able to vote NO without being branded enemies. Builders should be able to compete without being targeted. Token holders should not become collateral damage in personality conflicts. Ambassadors should be respected, yes. But they should not be used to make legitimate governance scrutiny off limits. So yes, let's take inventory. Who asked a governance question? Who answered with escalation? Who raised a possible conflict? Who turned it into a campaign against a project? Who claims to care about token holders? Who publicly attacked leadership of a project whose holders are also Cardano community members? Who says others play the victim? Who keeps casting himself as the victim whenever accountability arrives? That is the pattern people are seeing. And no amount of "grow up kids" changes it. Iagon will continue building. I will continue voting my conscience as a dRep. I will continue asking questions when treasury neutrality, conflicts of interest and governance integrity are at stake. If I am wrong, answer with facts. If you disagree, make the argument. But threats, mockery, blocks and public intimidation are not arguments. They are the behavior of someone who wants decentralized governance only until it decentralizes power away from him. Cardano deserves better than that.

@CardBordNo the self proclaimed fan of libertarianism and conservatist needs to deplete the Treasury to continue "profiting" 100 lifetimes of your salary.

Charlene shekumsoon needs the Condano treasury to continue "profiting" 100 lifetimes of your salary.

@Cerkoryn train it to be agentic cerk, i made a bunch of repos to send context to my AI first so it has all the resources plus a moral compass

Differences:

I performed my own assessment of all 95 Cardano proposals independently by reading every single one of them without AI and forming my own opinions. Having done that, I asked Codex 5.5 High to do the same just to see what it thought. It had no knowledge of my ranking. Prompt:

@BrothershipPool and in this moment we were all Brothership

@JureKaramarko Will be looted in less than 5 at this rate gg

The anti-Charles cabal is hitting harder than ever. People like that would kill their own father just to inherit the real estate immediately, instead of waiting 15–20 years until his death. It’s disgusting to see who is dragging this man’s name through their filthy mouths. X has become a sewer 🤮 ❤️ @IOHK_Charles

Historic

It would be nice if we had a @Cardano_CF whose core mission was protecting ADA holders, the voting citizens of Cardano, and SPOs, the operators who secure the network. Not trying to build, grow, expand, or compete in every direction. Just clear stewardship. Protect the holders. Support the operators. Defend the network.

Cardano needs to aggressively copy two things from Ethereum to maintain relevance as a useful UTXO alternative. 1. Become CROPS maximalists. 2. Steal their governance model (and by this I mean chain hardening and development roadmap not treasury governance).

🪙 Fixed Supply ≠ Fiat Logic We live in a fiat world where deficit spending is the default. That model does not port to a fixed-supply asset. Every ADA paid out of reserves is permanent dilution against a 45B cap. There is no print button to refill it. 🚫🖨️ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📊 The Math Sustainable treasury spend is bounded by τ × fee revenue. ▸ Today that's roughly 729,000 ADA/year ▸ Treasury outflow over the last 73 epochs ran at ~569x the sustainable bound ▸ The gap is filled from reserves (deplete asymptotically) and treasury balance (depletes linearly) ⏳ At the current delta, the treasury balance hits zero in ~289 epochs. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧾 Receipt ▸ Epochs 559-631 enacted treasury withdrawals: 414,873,507 ADA ▸ Treasury balance at epoch 632 tip: 1,640,103,135 ADA ▸ τ = 0.20 ▸ db-sync replica, queryable ✅

It's not about NOT funding it, it is about funnel the funding through 1 guy, who is only doing things for himself. Other people, other DEV-Shops, other people can get funded, would maybe even take less money - same results - or even better. Do you think, people who get treasury money THROUGH Charles, would say: NO i do NOT take the same money, because it's not Charles company sending the money, it is a different company?! People work for money, and it does not really matter which company does the payment. But IT DOES matter which company respects HIS OWN people in the ecosystem, the people WHO give ADA a value. And that person is clearly NOT Charles anymore!

This is a very simple question to the Dreps. Are you willing to destroy your bags and the bags of everyone that hold ADA (ultimately rending your future votes useless) because you are not willing to fund Cardano research and development anymore? If your vote is no, great. Please explain who is going to pick that torch up and do this work. If you have a replacement in mind, please provide transparency on whom that might be. Pointing out perceived issues is fine, but if you don't have an alternative solution, a "no" or "abstain" vote is detrimental. You think price is low now? Just wait to see what happens when none of this is funded.

@AlmaMater07 @0xNLYFANS @jimbolynya cutting Charles off would be so fucking Bullish

@0xNLYFANS @BEACNpool @jimbolynya 100% …. None. Zero.

Fuck me. Maybe he actually is the problem here?

@jimbolynya I’m starting to think Charles shouldn’t ever receive any funds, for any purpose.

@masatoalexander My kids are now at the age where they can try and whoop me back, cant allow this to happen.

the problem i'm trying to solve with RYPT is people aren't able to achieve their fitness goals. i've started to attribute this to a RATIONAL cost/benefit analysis that people are making (on incomplete info) do you want to get in better shape? what has prevented you up till now?