Between now and the end of the year I’m posting the most engaged with pieces that I’ve shared per month from January 2021 - November 2021 - enjoy!
In October, it was this piece from @rpwatermeyer@ProfTomCrick@Cathryn_Knight (10/11)
buff.ly/3jlNQRv
Calling all #teachers! We're holding a dedicated event for you to learn more about TEDI-London and visit our brand new campus in Canada Water, London.
🗓️ Wednesday 6 October, 3-7pm
🎟️bit.ly/3koXFiL
We'd love to see you there! #STEMeducation
If you're 16+ and looking to learn more about studying #engineering then we have the perfect online taster programme for you this October half-term! Apply to our free Thinking Ahead challenge: bit.ly/2V6Xu1s#STEM
@JRDingwall This is actually from my own student experience. I found it really useful, forced me to pick apart others responses / read a summary for a paper I hadn’t reviewed. Think it worked because there was some choice and the pedagogical intention was made clear
@JRDingwall I have experienced this is a forum to elicit peer feedback. So something like, ‘choose a paper, summarise, review two peer submissions.’ Works well, no escaping it’s a forced “conversation”, but giving and recieving feedback is valuable
“Collaborative tools were seen as most important by 81 per cent of members, ahead of assessment and online delivery solutions.” wonkhe.com/blogs/what-wer…