George

@Keanubtc This guy is incredibly dumb

Cyril Ramaphosa: "We built ships with cow dung and sailed the seas long before the dutch did"

@tyleraloevera Damn

WELL, WELL, WELL... AGAIN. My website host BANNED me... AGAIN. Reasons cited: 1. Hate Speech 2. Platform Circumvention GIVE A GOY A BREAK. DAMN.

@CollinRugg Stop asking for more of their money and start asking how you can CUT your spending.

Just two years after telling rich Republicans to jump on a bus and head to Florida, NY Gov Kathy Hochul begs rich taxpayers who are in Florida to come back to New York so they can pay more taxes. Hochul says she needs "high net worth" people to cut her checks to fund New York's social programs. "I need people who are high net worth to support the generous social programs that we wanna have in our state right now." "...Cut me the checks... The first step should be to go down to Palm Beach and see who you can bring back home, because our tax base has been eroded."

@Geiger_Capital Don't use words like "reckless" when describing actions like this. Reckless implies a lack of foresight. It was a calculated decision by Israel.

Trump just confirmed what I said… Israel attacked without Trump’s approval. Absolutely reckless. They are escalating and dragging us in at the expense of our Gulf allies.

@sungleeiq We're so cooked

🚨🚨🚨 THE MOST DANGEROUS QUESTION OF THIS ENTIRE WAR JUST GOT ASKED. AND NOBODY CAN ANSWER IT. Who controls this war? The U.S. or Israel? Two possibilities. Both are terrifying. 💀 Option 1: Israel told the U.S. about the South Pars attack — and Washington APPROVED it. That means the U.S. greenlit a strike on the LARGEST gas field on Earth. During a global energy crisis. While inflation is already crushing people. That's not strategy. That's economic suicide. 💀 Option 2: Israel told the U.S. — and Washington COULDN'T STOP its own ally from doing it. That means America's "junior war partner" is making decisions that could trigger World War 3 — and the president of the United States can't say no. Let that sink in. Now look at Trump's Truth Social post from HOURS later: → Trump says the U.S. "knew NOTHING about this particular attack" → Trump blames Israel — says they acted "out of anger" → Trump clears Qatar — "in NO WAY involved" → Trump tells Iran: stop hitting Qatar and we won't destroy South Pars HERE'S WHAT THIS MEANS — STEP BY STEP: ⚠️ Step 1: Israel struck South Pars WITHOUT full U.S. backing — or Trump is lying about not knowing. Either way, trust between the two allies is CRACKING ⚠️ Step 2: Iran retaliated against Qatar's Ras Laffan — the largest LNG facility on EARTH — because they assumed it was coordinated. It WASN'T ⚠️ Step 3: Trump is now PUBLICLY distancing from Israel to save the Qatar relationship and protect Gulf energy supply ⚠️ Step 4: Trump offered Iran a direct off-ramp — stop hitting Qatar, and the U.S. won't escalate. This is the first de-escalation signal since Day 1 ⚠️ Step 5: But here's the problem — if Israel acts ALONE again, another rogue strike could destroy the off-ramp overnight. Trump can offer peace. But can he CONTROL Israel? ⚠️ Step 6: Iran now has to decide — was Trump's post genuine? Or is this a trap? If they trust it and stop → de-escalation. If they don't → they hit Qatar again → and Trump destroys South Pars ⚠️ Step 7: The ENTIRE outcome of this war now depends on ONE thing — whether a junior partner with its own agenda listens to the senior partner who's trying to stop the bleeding They're showing you two superpowers in conflict. They're NOT showing you that NEITHER of them may be in control. Israel is making moves. Iran is retaliating. And America is scrambling to catch up with a war its own ally keeps escalating. If Trump can't control Israel, no deal he offers Iran is worth the paper it's written on. And if Iran doesn't believe Trump can deliver — they won't stop. This is the most dangerous moment of the ENTIRE war. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 If you're seeing this, the algorithm hasn't caught up yet. Follow + RT NOW. 🚨

@elonmusk @RWMaloneMD 1st and 2nd too

@RWMaloneMD Third trimester is unambiguously murder

This isn't rocket science. A Late-term abortion of a baby is murder.

Israel wants regime change in Iran and they're willing to destroy the global energy supply chain to get it.

LOL. Greatest ally strikes again.

@CollinRugg Amazing. The family should've raised him not to rob stores.

NEW: Family of a Texas teen loses it as judge sentences him to 25 years in prison for robbing a convenience store. Judge Raquel West was seen torching 18-year-old Caden James Fontenette before handing out the sentence. "There was a time some years ago that there really wasn't even a question... State's attorneys were recommending youthful offenders probation. Let's give everybody an opportunity..." West said. "You don't have a good likelihood of being successful if I were to put you on probation... I'm going to sentence you to a term of 25 years." Fontenette pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery for a 2025 incident where he and two others robbed a convenience store at gunpoint. The suspects were caught on camera assaulting the store clerk. Fontenette will likely be in his 40s when he is released from prison.

California should be placed under federal conservatorship until we figure out what the hell is going on.

@RealJamesWoods Yeah that's definitely from a scammer in some 3rd world country. Ignore it and don't click any links unc.

I’ve received a threat from X that they will be shutting down my account within 48 hours because of something I posted. Of course, there’s no one I can speak to about this. If I’m closed down, just know it’s been fun.

@nikitabier Good job. I'm tired of AI slop, fake news, and rage-bait posts all over my timeline 24/7

The financial incentive to spam on X will decline enormously over the next 30 days and soon be negative.

GREAT IDEA! The United States' loss at the WBC will be turned into a win if we make Venezuela part of America. Cuba too. Sorry, Canada, we've moved on.

Venezuela just beat the United States at Baseball. But we now own their oil, so we should let this one slide.

Cuba's communist dictator just promised to respond to Trump & Marco Rubio with impregnable resistance. This guy should immediately get the Maduro treatment. "The US publicly threatens Cuba, almost daily, with overthrowing the constitutional order by force. And it uses an outrageous pretext: the harsh limitations of the weakened economy that they have attacked and sought to isolate for more than six decades. They intend and announce plans to seize the country, its resources, its properties, and even the very economy they seek to strangle to make us surrender. Only in this way can the fierce economic war be explained, which is applied as collective punishment against the entire people. In the face of the worst scenario, Cuba is accompanied by a certainty: any external aggressor will clash with an impregnable resistance."

@aaronp613 Lovely

Here is your first look at X's upcoming "Region Conversation Control" feature You will be able to limit replies to your post to people from specific regions.

The most consistent reply I'm getting is that Poland isn't a fair comparison because they're in the EU. Sure, let's go with that. Singapore was colonized by the Brits for 140 years and gained independence in 1965. The country was a small resource-poor island with nothing significant going for them. They were also surrounded by poor communist neighbors. But Lee Kuan Yew decided he would break away from norms and create the most competitive business environment in the world and maximize the population's brain power since human capital was the only way they could compete. LKY incentived all the companies of the world to setup their bases in Singapore and they did. In 1990, Singapore's GDP was $74 billion after 3 decades of work by LKY. South Africa was at $126 billion. Today, Singapore's GDP is $570 billion, and projected to grow above 2%. South Africa is at $440 billion & stagnant at 1% growth. Once again with way more people, more resources, more farmland, more coastline, more everything. 30 years under LKY took Singapore from $400 GDP per capita to $11,000 in 1990. 30 years of black socialist rule in South Africa has taken the GDP per capita from $3,489 to $6,830. To put that into even more comparison, Chile's GDP in 1994 was around the same as SA, today it's over $17,000. China was also an extremely poor country with a communist economy until Deng Xiaoping's reforms opened up the economy and allow the private sector to flourish. The one thing all the successful countries have in common is that instead of making laws to take from some and give to others, they created laws to stimulate business activity. South Africa's legislators are busy making laws to force black ownership in companies, meanwhile serious countries are creating laws that make it easier for black entrepreneurs to start their own businesses. Back to the Poland point. People should ask themselves: what economic policies were practiced in EU in the 1990s and early 2000s that made it such a powerful organization? That Poland joined the EU and benefited is true, but what about the EU made it so prosperous? The answer is free-market CAPITALISM. Fast-forward to 2026 and you'll see that EU economies are now stagnating because they're consistently moving away from the very policies that made them rich. The EU has turned Europe into an overregulated bureaucratic hell. They went from being a powerhouse of bright ideas and innovations to forcing websites to add annoying cookie pop-ups.

In 1994, the year apartheid ended, South Africa’s GDP was approximately $150 billion. Poland’s was at $110 billion. In 2026, Poland's GDP is over $1.1 TRILLION & growing above 3% & South Africa is stuck at $440 billion and barely growing at 1%. Poland has 36 million people and South Africa is at 65 million. South Africa is almost 4x bigger than Poland. South Africa has superior weather, far more natural resources, more arable farmland, longer coastline, more biodiversity, etc. This happened because Poland rejected Soviet Communism & chose free-market capitalism for its economic model and South Africa chose race socialism. Socialist leaders beginning with Nelson Mandela resolved that the only way to fix economic "inequality" between whites and blacks was by taking from whites and giving it to the poor blacks. To no one's surprise, it only made everyone poorer. Governments cannot create wealth, let alone by taking from some and giving to others. Only entrepreneurs create wealth. The government's job is to create an enabling environment to let builders build. All people need from governments are: globally competitive tax rates, if any, well-maintained roads, law & order, efficient bureaucracy (if that's even a thing). With all those things & some more, prosperity will come and only then can a government reasonably justify increasing welfare spending. Achieve the basics, then you can pretend to be magnanimous through state handouts. Anyways, Congratulations to Poland. Unfortunately for South Africa, I don't see any light in their future. The popularity of the new-gen socialists chanting to genocide the native white Boers is disturbing, and even more so when they eventually take power. If you ask the average South African, they'll say apartheid is still happening even though black commies have been running the country into the ground for 30 years. If it's not apartheid, they'll say it's the CIA stopping them from [insert basic government responsibility] I hope every country on earth rejects the demonic doctrines of socialism & communism.

South Africa's black literacy rate in 1994 was near 80% and only around 50% across Africa at the same time. In 1960, 1 million South African black kids were in school, by the late 1980, the number was 7 million. In 1994, South Africa’s GDP per capita was $3,500. Across Africa it was less than $1,500 Black life expectancy in South Africa was around 60 years in 1994. It was roughly 50 years across Africa. Infant mortality for black South Africans was significantly lower as well. ~47.5 per 1,000 live births in 1994 vs the Sub-Saharan average of 80–90+ per 1,000 in many countries. These are all verifiable facts. If you don't want to use Poland as an example then 🤷. How about Australia and New Zealand? Two countries in a random part of the world. In 1994, New Zealand's GDP was $55 billion, today it's $280 billion. No one can argue New Zealand has more than South Africa in any category, yet they're a highly developed economy. Argentina and South Africa are comparable. Two countries with immense potential destroyed by socialism. One is making a big comeback and the other is still complaining about things that happened in the 90s. Rwanda went through one of the most vicious genocides in history and they've moved on. In a few decades, it wouldn't be surprising if their economy became more developed than South Africa.

Poland joined the European Union and got massive European Union investment. Poland got access to European markets duty-free for both tariff and non-tariff barriers. The Soviet Union was bad, but they educated everyone equally. The Apartheid government didn’t give people education. How many people do you think we’re illiterate in 1994 South Africa? $440 billion with all that baggage is pretty good.

Wow