Benchmark Divine, ARCH.

I take many L's I don't see them as Losses but Lessons.

That was a Full Meat and Greet 😂😭

I’ve never seen anything more accurate

I don’t know how this is okay, western countries deciding Sudan’s future without Sudan’s presence…

LMAOOOOOOOO

We don’t call a musician great for playing Mozart’s music

Me busy making my bed on the floor. My rich cousin: You also do Yoga?? Me:

32° East Arts Centre by New Makers Bureau Kampala, Uganda 🇺🇬

A reminder that these are the people who don’t want their grandkids learning about this in school because they wouldn’t have a logical answer for why they did it.

a sarcastic show about american politics, features russia and nazis but no mention of israel, curious

how i sleep knowing that Colonisers are getting Colonised

What would make a person change his name 3 times?

Jota’s family need to come out and ask these people to stop blaming poor performances on his death

The timing of #TheBoys is becoming scary ….

Arteta Bin Laden vs Simeone Shekau

Israel invaded Lebanon in 1978

That was some super fast information transfer 😂⚡

Double-tap strikes targeting medics isn’t a “war against Hezbollah.” It’s a WAR CRIME.

The whites are rewriting history again😐

I mean what more signs do we need

Uganda’s proposed Sovereignty Bill is the ONLY law in the world openly attempting something this sweeping: it legally turns its own citizens abroad into “foreigners”. The Bill is explicit. A “foreigner” includes “Ugandan citizens residing abroad”. That single clause redraws the boundary of citizenship. It means diaspora money, relationships, and even family support can fall under foreign control rules. So the implications are not abstract. -A mother in Mbale receiving school fees from her son in London. -A boda boda rider in Gulu financed by a brother in Dubai. -A small shop in Mbarara stocked using capital sent from Boston. All could, in theory, fall under foreign influence rules. Then the net widens. The definition of an “agent of a foreigner” includes anyone “directly or indirectly… financed or subsidised” by a foreigner. Not directed. Not controlled. Simply funded. -A journalist paid by a locally registered outlet that receives donor support. -A researcher on a project with partial foreign grants. -An NGO worker whose salary traces back, however distantly, to external funding. All can be classified as “agents”. Clause 22 then imposes a hard ceiling: “a cap on foreign funding of approximately UGX 400 million within any twelve-month period”, beyond which ministerial approval is required. So: -A private hospital built with diaspora investment. -A school supported by an international foundation. -A construction firm using a foreign loan. Then comes the sharpest edge. -Clause 13 creates the offence of economic sabotage, criminalising anyone who “publishes information… that weakens or damages the economic system”. So: -A newspaper reporting a currency slide. -An analyst warning about debt stress. -A civil society group highlighting inflation pressures. Even if accurate, such reporting could fall foul of the law. Finally, Clause 5 prohibits activities that promote foreign interests “against the interests of Uganda”, a phrase the law does not define. Put together, these clauses do something unprecedented. -They do not just regulate foreign influence. -They redefine who is foreign. -They extend control from politics into everyday economic and social life. In most countries, including Ethiopia and Ethiopia, sovereignty laws manage outsiders. Here, Uganda redefined outsiders to include its citizens, basically rewriting the 1995 constitution. Of course it’s in the preparatory and consultation stage and could change for better - or WORSE!