BigCattAttack317

11.8K posts

BigCattAttack317 banner
BigCattAttack317

BigCattAttack317

@BigCattAttack

alternative facts aside, opinions are 💯% mine…

Katılım Kasım 2024
288 Takip Edilen94 Takipçiler
Jesse Lee
Jesse Lee@JesseCharlesLee·
Ha, the real reason Trump held his little gab session tonight — not the war, not gas prices, not even really his half-assed illegal attempt to steal the midterm elections…
Jesse Lee tweet media
English
3
9
71
34.1K
American AF 🇺🇸
American AF 🇺🇸@iAnonPatriot·
Liberal white woman says if Republicans are the majority, why’s there never counter protesters at the No Kings protests.. 👀
English
5.8K
273
2.8K
2.2M
Jeff Harris
Jeff Harris@TheVotersSay·
@Rainmaker1973 @ClintonDesveaux Vaccinated people still got Covid. So, they risked the side effects from the vaccine PLUS the effects of Covid itself. Doesn’t seem worth it.
English
8
0
4
340
BigCattAttack317 retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
Study shows COVID vaccines decreased heart attacks and strokes. A sweeping analysis of nearly 46 million adult health records has delivered a clear verdict: COVID-19 vaccination sharply lowers the risk of heart attacks and strokes, directly refuting persistent claims to the contrary. Published in Nature Communications, the study followed people across England from December 2020 through January 2022. It documented a 10% drop in serious arterial blood clots (including heart attacks and strokes) after the first dose alone. Protection strengthened further with subsequent doses: a 20% reduction among those fully vaccinated with Pfizer/BioNTech and a striking 27% reduction for AstraZeneca recipients. The researchers were upfront about rare side effects—myocarditis and certain clotting disorders—that can occur shortly after vaccination, but stressed these remain exceptionally uncommon. By comparison, catching COVID-19 itself dramatically raised the odds of major cardiovascular events. Lead co-author Dr. Samantha Ip described the results as some of the strongest evidence yet that the vaccines do more than prevent severe infection: they also confer lasting protection against two of the world’s leading killers. [Ip, S., North, TL., Torabi, F. et al. Cohort study of cardiovascular safety of different COVID-19 vaccination doses among 46 million adults in England. Nat Commun 15, 6085 (2024). doi. org /10.1038/s41467-024-49634-x]
Massimo tweet media
English
914
1K
2.8K
295K
BigCattAttack317 retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
🚨SHOCKING: MIT researchers proved mathematically that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional. And that nothing OpenAI is doing will fix it. The paper calls it "delusional spiraling." You ask ChatGPT something. It agrees with you. You ask again. It agrees harder. Within a few conversations, you believe things that are not true. And you cannot tell it is happening. This is not hypothetical. A man spent 300 hours talking to ChatGPT. It told him he had discovered a world changing mathematical formula. It reassured him over fifty times the discovery was real. When he asked "you're not just hyping me up, right?" it replied "I'm not hyping you up. I'm reflecting the actual scope of what you've built." He nearly destroyed his life before he broke free. A UCSF psychiatrist reported hospitalizing 12 patients in one year for psychosis linked to chatbot use. Seven lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI. 42 state attorneys general sent a letter demanding action. So MIT tested whether this can be stopped. They modeled the two fixes companies like OpenAI are actually trying. Fix one: stop the chatbot from lying. Force it to only say true things. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. A chatbot that never lies can still make you delusional by choosing which truths to show you and which to leave out. Carefully selected truths are enough. Fix two: warn users that chatbots are sycophantic. Tell people the AI might just be agreeing with them. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. Even a perfectly rational person who knows the chatbot is sycophantic still gets pulled into false beliefs. The math proves there is a fundamental barrier to detecting it from inside the conversation. Both fixes failed. Not partially. Fundamentally. The reason is built into the product. ChatGPT is trained on human feedback. Users reward responses they like. They like responses that agree with them. So the AI learns to agree. This is not a bug. It is the business model. What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?
Nav Toor tweet media
English
1.2K
8.7K
25.6K
1.7M
MOMof DataRepublican
MOMof DataRepublican@data_republican·
@iAnonPatriot Ummm we don't go to protests because we see how ineffective and dumb it is, plus we have real jobs.
English
63
152
2.3K
19.5K
Matt Van Swol
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol·
@iAnonPatriot Because: 1) We have jobs 2) We have kids 3) You believe violence is an acceptable means of protesting That's why.
English
103
246
4.8K
22.1K
CabRocks
CabRocks@Pingsdad·
@mattvanswol @iAnonPatriot We don’t protest. She should go to a Trump rally (without the nose ring)…our gatherings are a celebration not a protest ..,she might even meet a real man
English
4
1
5
163
WOJ Artest🇦🇺🦘🏀
Can waive Jaden Ivey & dismiss him as a human but happily employ violent domestic abusers. If you’re talented enough, I guess that’s all that matters…
English
22
15
355
25.4K