tunak

21.5K posts

tunak banner
tunak

tunak

@tunak

"Tunak tunak tun, tunak tunak tun, tunak tunak tun da da da." ―William F. Buckley Jr.

@tunak.bsky.social Katılım Mart 2009
99 Takip Edilen170 Takipçiler
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@SterlingReece88 She is doing the exact opposite of rationalizing crime in that post, you’re just a stupid person who can’t read so you failed to understand it.
English
0
0
3
17
Cassie Pritchard
Cassie Pritchard@hecubian_devil·
I know Lindy West is making us all think about the shortcomings of Millennial feminism, but Gen Z feminism seems to mostly be about having coquette aesthetics and believing sodomy dooms your immortal soul, so we may look back fondly on Lindy in due course.
English
18
49
1K
80.7K
Dominic Tarro
Dominic Tarro@dominictarro·
x.com/USWREMichael/s… Yes, those two objections are addressed here. Emil says Anthropic wanted additional restrictions that prevented DoW from both innocuous and legal data analysis and revoke its ability to act within the full, legal bounds of autonomous weapons policy. He also covered this an interview. Anthropic wanted air-tight terms on what the tech can be used for and to be included in the chain of approval for any grey areas. It's not acceptable if we end up in a war and the DoW needs freedom of action and to make judgement calls on acceptable risk in battle, but they need to run it by Dario first.
Under Secretary of War Emil Michael@USWREMichael

As usual, more lies from @DarioAmodei. @AnthropicAI wanted language that would prevent all @DeptofWar employees from doing a LinkedIn search! Then, they wanted to stop DoW from using any *PUBLIC* database that would enable us to, eg., recruit military services members or hire new employees. When I called to discuss cutting off @DeptofWar from using publicly available information would hurt our military readiness, @DarioAmodei didn't have the courage to answer. Then put out another lie that no one from @DeptofWar reached out in Anthropic's post a few hours later. He wants to play God and make new 'law' and...really stupid laws at that. We agreed, IN WRITING, to act according to the "National Security Act of 1947 and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS." They wanted the word "pursuant" versus "consistent with" and wanted to delete ALL APPLICABLE LAWS which was less protective of Americans (can't make this up!) We never asked for guardrails to be taken out (lie!). We agreed to human oversight of all weapons systems by saying "The Department of War will use the AI system for all lawful use cases, in accordance, with applicable U.S. law and Department of War directives, including those governing kinetic operations and DoD Directive 30000.09...The Department AFFRIMS that it will ensure appropriate human oversight is in place and that it will monitor and retain the ability to override or disable the AI system...as appropriate." He didn't like "as appropriate." He would prefer "inappropriate"? I even agreed to take that out. He knows it, his investors, customers and employees should know about his lies. Risking the safety and security of our country and our troops are a marketing vehicle for him. Make @DarioAmodei testify UNDER OATH on why he is lying and trying to bring shame on our great military! He would rather violate the chain of command and substitute his own policies (or those of the Anthropic Constitution and the Anthropic Soul) to recruit researchers and get some downloads all while we are in the midst of a battle.

English
2
0
0
29
florence ⏹️
florence ⏹️@morallawwithin·
remember—you should do whatever the government wants, even things you think are immoral, because otherwise you’re deciding what you can do instead of the government, which is undemocratic
Sam Altman@sama

Three general things from this AMA: 1. There is more open debate than I thought ther ewould be, at least in this part of Twitter, about whether we should prefer a democratically elected government or unelected private companies to have more power. I guess this is something people disagree on, but…I don’t. This seems like an important area for more discussion. 2. I think the is a question behind a lot of the questions but I haven’t seen quite articulated: What happens if the government tries to nationalize OpenAI or other AI efforts? I obviously don’t know; I have thought about it of course (it has seemed to me for a long time it might be be better if building AGI were a government project) but it doesn’t seem super likely on the current trajectory. That said, I do think a close partnership between governments and the companies building this technology is super important. 3. People take their safety (in the national security sense) more for granted than I realized, which I think is a good thing on balance but I don’t think shows enough respect to the tremendous work it takes for that to happen. Also, I am on the whole very grateful for the level of reasonable and good-faith engagement here. It was not what I expected.

English
24
134
2.1K
107.6K
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@ArdriBawkBawk @mattyglesias A standalone bill that funds TSA definitionally does not fund anything else. Do you have any idea what you’re talking about? At all?
English
0
0
0
14
Ard-ri Bawk Bawk 🐔
Ard-ri Bawk Bawk 🐔@ArdriBawkBawk·
@tunak @mattyglesias Right, the "fund all of DHS except for ICE bill" is definitely a "standalone bill" that doesn't try to "limit ICE". 🤦🏼‍♂️
English
1
0
0
13
camillus
camillus@chateauroissy·
@mattyglesias Their supposed "standalone" bill had an amnesty for illegals attached. Matt is trying to play ignorant.
English
6
0
10
1.8K
Jeffery Deckard
Jeffery Deckard@panama721·
@mattyglesias This is false. The Republicans had a bill that funded everything except Ice and demorats turned it down.
English
1
0
0
42
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@MinamtheD @mattyglesias Grok is wrong, Matt is referring to a standalone TSA funding bill which has no provisions in it besides funding TSA. Grok is talking about the overall DHS funding
English
1
0
0
59
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@varadmehta In what way has the war been beneficial for America? Be *extremely* specific.
English
0
0
2
41
Varad Mehta
Varad Mehta@varadmehta·
Saying anything positive about the war is tantamount to saying something positive about Trump. And that is simply not acceptable. So the Dem-industrial complex is doing its best to portray it as a failure. They'd rather have America lose than Trump win. It's as simple as that.
Noah Rothman@NoahCRothman

The verdict from some quarters is in: The war is “quickly becoming a disaster.” The sooner Washington acknowledges its defeat, the better... That dour outlook seems wholly divorced from an objective appraisal of the war in its fourth week.

English
37
79
458
16.6K
Maine Murf
Maine Murf@MaineMurf·
@aseitzwald The Democrats FINALLY admitting what Republicans have been telling them for 8 years. . . Janet Mills is a complete disaster and she and the Democratic Legislature have destroyed the once great, State of Maine!
English
1
0
2
260
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@rokhlin > Noncitizen immigrants consumed 53 percent less welfare than native-born Americans. Reread this until you understand it, and then close your mouth. You don't get to speak anymore, you're completely out of your depth. cato.org/briefing-paper…
English
0
0
0
4
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@rokhlin Jesus Christ, you're so stupid it's painful. The people receiving welfare in those households are THE CITIZENS. That's why CIS used the household number, because they're hacks, and you fell for it because you have low IQ and suffer from Dunning-Kruger.
English
1
0
0
5
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@rokhlin Okay, I can see that you're barely fucking sentient, so I'll try to push some information into your thick inbred skull. Quick IQ test. Does "61% of illegal immigrant households receive welfare" mean "61% of illegal immigrants receive welfare"? Yes or no, dumbfuck?
English
2
0
0
9
crk
crk@rokhlin·
@tunak If you cannot extrapolate an answer from this paragraph to your question, then you are functionally retarded, and or purposefully being obtuse, either way, it re-affirms every preconceived stereotype and notion I have about you and your people.
crk tweet media
English
1
0
0
13
Joe Young
Joe Young@JoeYoun15998369·
@tunak @BillMelugin_ @FoxNews You are on drugs. Bidens DHS lied every second of every day. They intentionally trafficked 10 million foreign non citizens across the border and into the interior of the country. They allowed the deliberate INVASION of this country.They should be imprisoned or worse for treason.
English
1
0
0
12
Bill Melugin
Bill Melugin@BillMelugin_·
BREAKING: DHS tells @FoxNews that this viral incident at SFO airport last night involved ICE arrests of a family Guatemalan illegal immigrants who have had a deportation order since 2019, and one of the females tried to flee while being escorted for processing. Happened before ICE was deployed to help TSA. DHS statement to FOX: “This arrest occurred BEFORE ICE officers were even deployed to airports to bolster TSA efforts to help American travelers who are facing hours long lines across the country.   “On March 22, 2026, ICE officers arrested Angelina Lopez-Jimenez and Wendy Godinez-Lopez at the San Francisco International Airport. The family has an outstanding final removal order of removal from an immigration judge since 2019.   “While being escorted to the international terminal for processing, Lopez-Jimenez attempted to flee and resisted law enforcement officers. ICE is working as quickly as possible to repatriate the family unit to their home country of Guatemala."
Surajit@surajit_ghosh2

Chaos erupts at San Francisco International Airport

English
265
1.6K
6.3K
264.1K
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@rokhlin > that confirms that statement No it doesn’t, and thanks for confirming that you’re too fucking stupid to read a sentence. I asked if “61% of illegal immigrants receive welfare.” What you quoted DOES NOT SAY THAT. Read it again, you absolute fucking idiot.
English
1
0
0
12
crk
crk@rokhlin·
@tunak You're literally acting retarded, if you can't extrapolate an answer from the paragraph I posted, that was literally pulled off of google, that confirms that statement in the first fucking sentence, then the only reasonable conclusion I can make is you have a learning disability.
English
1
0
0
19
tunak
tunak@tunak·
@SwannMarcus89 They aren’t voting for Democrats, they’re voting for groypers. Pointless defection. We should encourage their despair, though. Make them nonvoters for life!
English
0
0
2
128
Swann Marcus
Swann Marcus@SwannMarcus89·
It pisses me off how whenever a former Trump supporter turns on him liberals make fun of them for being a rube Don’t you think it’s kind of bad conservatives welcome defectors with open arms while we demand they say 500 Hail Marys before we invite them to the cocktail party?
English
364
110
1.7K
102.5K