Chief Squirrel

Karl Marx never bathed and had boils all over his body, was an alcoholic, had an unpaid maid whom he might have r*ped (he certainly got her pregnant, despite what Wikipedia says). He smoked so much it killed one of his babies (which he left in the family bed - the only one they had - because he was too lazy to get a job to afford to bury it), and he made his aristocratic wife depressed and turn to drink. Two of his surviving daughters committed suic*de, and the only child to survive into old age was the boy he fathered to the maid, who didn't live with Marx and was therefore the only sane one. Engels and other family, friends and neighbours had to constantly give Marx money throughout his life because he never did anything productive. He had to beg and borrow, and sent his wife off to do the same. He worked briefly as a article writer for a newspaper, but never had another job and couldn't provide for his family, despite their need, and despite him being more than capable of working. He was constantly in debt, and because he didn't pay his rent the bailiffs took away the family furniture, even the crib. They owed everyone, even the bakers and the milkmen. Yet Marx still refused to work! And to top it off, Marx was wrong about everything. We know this because his fairytale predictions about the future have simply not come true, and were proven to be wrong during his lifetime and not long after his death (e.g. by Eduard Bernstein). His policies have led to misery for billions of people, and death to many tens of millions. Why anyone pines over this monster is beyond me. And if Karl Marx is the best "social theorist" we've ever had, then it's no wonder society is parasitical and anti-life. You should care whether he was wrong or not, but you won't because the socialist faith turns people into sleepwalking NPCs.

So the argument is we have no choice but to live in a corrupt world run by corrupt people because if the corrupt people were put in prison for their corruption their corrupt world would fall apart? Have I got that right? (Because if so, do you hear how stupid that sounds??)

@PIN37147934 @GBNT1952 The fact that you think you don't is just evidence that propaganda works

So, let me get this straight, our government is both full of pedophiles and pedophile apologists, and they have stolen all of our money and racked up $323,052 of debt for every single taxpayer in the country? At least we have Netflix and Amazon though, amirite? We aren’t serious people…

@LibertyCappy Nothing. I mean I'd love to say he should tell them to get fucked, but nothing is the actual correct answer

@sudanodesu @wil_da_beast630 People like you are incapable of honest discussion aren't you?

The Natives were 110% in the right. They just lost.

@wil_da_beast630 The Europeans on the other hand brought the entire concept of property rights with them. Only AFTER European conquest did American Indians start to be able to own land and not have it subject to conquest.

@wil_da_beast630 Nonsense. It was no more their land than anyone else's, they murdered the previous people who lived there, often within living memory of European settlers arrival. Pretending they have some moral right to land they killed for is idiotic.

@Anc_Aesthetics No but I'm starting to hate shit heads like you.

You don’t hate boomers enough, you think you do but you don’t

@TheOklahoman24 @Fat_Electrician You should care because of the implications it has on government power, accountability, corruption, and the people's ability to get to the bottom of issues related to those things. If this isn't completely blown open the USA as we understand it essentially no longer exists.

@Fat_Electrician Controversial opinion I don't care about the Epstein situation. People hyper focusing their entire feeds with it is getting on my nerves

So the new conspiracy theory is that the government is covering up the Epstein client list because the CIA, FBI, or some other intelligence agency was involved in running it? Guys, that’s just plain crazy. We can totally trust the government. It’s not like they’ve ever: -Run a whorehouse to secretly dose people with psychedelic drugs in an attempt to develop mind control. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation… -Ever sprayed a cloud of bacteria over a major city, made a bunch of people sick, just to see what would happen? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation… -Offer free healthcare to poor Black men, tell them you’re treating their syphilis, a completely treatable disease, and then deliberately not treat it, just to see what happens. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_… -Inject a 53-year-old man, who was in the hospital after a car accident—with radioactive plutonium without telling him, just to see what would happen. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebb_Cade

@regi_davis @thevivafrei Which is why most people in a conspiracy don't know the conspiracy. Epstein's pilots are a great example. Drive here, deliver this, detain her, transport to X. None of the people involved know the secret, they're just fulfilling their small part in the process.

@thevivafrei An inescapable truism: any secret known by more than one person eventually becomes publicly known. I’m still waiting for evidence of 1)Epstein’s murder, 2)the existence of a blackmail list or 3)a government coverup of either. I don’t believe those things could be kept secret.

A potential theory I propose: This is a deep-state takedown of two of the most powerful populist voices, Bongino and Patel.

@regi_davis @thevivafrei Evidence like there being no video, then suddenly there IS video? Or the sex trafficking with no clients, or more importantly, no suppliers? Where did they get all these girls? Magic? If there was nothing to cover up there would be nothing to lie about.

@CynicalPublius They owe a hell of a lot more than that.

Here is my personally definitive take on the Epstein matter: 1. Bondi screwed up royally with "the list is on my desk." 2. Bondi screwed up royally with the distribution of "binders" (that said nothing) to X randos. 3. If there is evidence enough for a prosecution, DOJ cannot tell us names while the investigation is ongoing. 4. If there is not evidence enough for a prosecution but there are suspicious names, DOJ cannot tell us those either. 5. DOJ OWES THE PUBLIC (emphasis on "OWES") one of two statements: "Yes, we are investigating several suspects." -or- "The information we have is insufficient to conduct further investigations."

@RobertMSterling Shut the fuck up.

Stay away from psychedelic drugs. LSD, psilocybin, ayahuasca, whatever else. Don’t go near any of it. I don’t care if your smart friends say it changed their lives or opened their mind to new dimensions. This stuff literally melts your brain and rots your soul. Don’t touch it.

@Black_Pilled Oh so we're being delusional again, cool

I bet if you were to ask straight white men privately if they would support sending heavily armed forces door to door, city by city, forcibly removing all immigrants from their country, the majority would answer in the affirmative and with a smile on their face.

@AuldMaryAnn @CynicalPublius No, you're a retard who's too lazy and incompetent to even make your fallacious nonsense arguments yourself. I'm tired of hearing the same debunked idiocy over and over, but I'm not going to pretend an AI prompted response is actual evidence like a commie fuckwit

@BigFatMike @CynicalPublius No I am tired repeating simple concepts to reality deniers.

Democrats want every non-American on Planet Earth to have the right to come to the USA illegally and receive free redistributions of the wealth you and I create. In return, they get counted in the census in Democrat states and get to vote illegally for the Democrats who give them free stuff. This is not hyperbole. This is an absolute straight-arrow statement of undeniable fact.

@MitraHispana @dr_brownian @GreeneMan6 It's logical. Ironically, being blind to the logic is you demonstrating your opponents argument. Obviously all adult citizens shouldn't vote. This is self evident. The question is how do we determine who should be able to vote.

@dr_brownian @GreeneMan6 18 is fine; all adult citizens should vote. Remember, you’re the one bringing up military service and suffering war. 🤷‍♀️ not a unique or logical argument.

Generally, women do NOT like PRIMARY decision making. They do NOT like wielding hard executive power. They do NOT want to own the consequences of hard calls. Women like SECONDARY decision making. They like being vaguely influential. They like being stakeholders that can’t be blamed for problems. And voting is the perfect secondary form of decision making. You vaguely participate as a stakeholder and are never seen as directly accountable for an outcome. So of course women love voting. The problem is that this form of “power without responsibility” second order decision making that women love, and which voting embodies, is incredibly deleterious to large scale civilizational management. It needs to be curtailed and we are trying to figure out how.

@MitraHispana @dr_brownian @GreeneMan6 Political power is derived from consent? Really? Why am I paying tax I don't consent to? Power is derived from violence, I pay tax because if I don't, men with guns will come for me.

@dr_brownian @GreeneMan6 Also killed by men. Political power is derived from the consent of the governed. Period. There is nothing to study.

@MitraHispana @jonleathem @GreeneMan6 Poor straw man. Some people are not fit to exercise political franchise. Giving it to basically everyone was a mistake, we need new standards to help determine suitability. Sex may need to be one of those standards, but maybe there are better ways to discriminate.

@jonleathem @GreeneMan6 “The government I can participate in sucks. Let’s go back to a form of government where I have no say. That will work.” 🤡

@RelaxedSeagull @ThrillaRilla369 Cool but i'm not a Lambo I'm an F250

@ThrillaRilla369 Sure. Most of my generation did. I find it repelling to see more women than men covered in tattoos, most often accompanied by n piercings (next week: n+1). You never put a sticke on a Lambo.

Did anyone reach 30+ years with zero tattoos?

@believeonjesus @ThrillaRilla369 There are only 10 commandments, the rest are more like, guidelines.

@ThrillaRilla369 Yes. 0 tattoos well after 30+ years. (Leviticus 19:28) "Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD."