Jonathan Leathem

@BlackDumpling @9mmsmg Japan posts have almost dropped entirely off for me, despite interacting and liking them when they were pushed. Annoying; I very much enjoyed seeing that stuff.

@9mmsmg Here's my past 7 days. (not including today). About 30% of that is probably interactions with Japan, but even then I'm still punching well above my weight class.

New algo is a nightmare. Nothing I do breaks containment. Original posts, short posts, long posts, dulb videos. Every single thing I post fails. Never had it this bad ever. I don't do engagement scams or anything else. My account is just dead. 2.7m impressions in the last 7 days. Low end before was 10m.

@RogueScholarPr @FischerKing64 Lame Duck: “I’m going to reclassify all these govt employees so I can fire them!” District Court: lol no Week 1 Biden + Congress: now you can’t ever do it, thanks for the heads up Levels of Incompetence rarely seen

@FischerKing64 Remember all the last minute firings and BASED appointees during the lame duck end of Trump’s first term?

Dhillon rearranged priorities in the civil rights division so dramatically that 80% of the attorneys resigned. She’s been trying to hire people to replace them - but it’s hard because discriminating against whites is what most lawyers think ‘civil rights’ is. Another reason why losing in 2026 and 2028 would be a disaster. Gavin Newsom will rehire all the 80% who have resigned, and viciously pursue everyone involved in Trump 2.

@bobjhonson96 @ItIsHoeMath @hashjenni Weaken is not the same thing as destroy. Japan too big? Plaza Accords. Soviets? Petrodollar (I’d argue it wasn’t intended to cause collapse). Post-USSR there was a need to curtail the West, so the insane immigration laws of the 90s in US and then EU in 2000s. Prob China next idk

@ItIsHoeMath @hashjenni Why would Israel want to destroy the US ? How destroying the US benefits Israel ?

Serious question: why would a United States president actively destroy his own country? We can all see it.

@PartyMcFlyX @basedspinach Psychic powers before real anime this guy knows the tech tree

In the 1960s Jews immigrated to America and had a field day suing white ingenuity like this

@zarathustra5150 Barring some massive black swan exogenous shock, we don’t have the conditions for a real civil breakdown. There’s Boomers themselves, their younger family who don’t want to hurt them - and, if any external elites actually exist, they don’t have motion (as the kids say)

Civil wars happen when *capital* turns on itself, elite factions & rival power centers organize against each other & fight for control of the central authority. Not random normies getting mad at each other online, rubes scuffling in Portland, Boomer LARPsurrectionists cosplaying insurrection at the Capitol, etc. or any of that. And we’re not seeing anything like it. If anything, American elites are much more unified today than at most other points in U.S. history, across every region, power center, capital formation center, etc. What we have might be called a “cold civil war”, as it were, in which each side views the other as wicked & reprehensible. But that’s nothing new. Beyond the last 30 years of *extremely unusual* peace and prosperity, it has largely always been the case, as recently as the Civil Rights era. Low-level street violence seems here to stay (ANTIFA maggots, Boomer LARPsurrectionist Cap Hill cosplayers). But this is the furthest thing from a legitimate civil war. The impotent Boomer Larpo-factions on the right especially don’t have the capital, industrial base, power, influence, IQ, or technological capacity to pose a serious threat to centralized state power.

@EdAwesome01 @AuronMacintyre @willchamberlain Love the sinner hate the sin

@AuronMacintyre @willchamberlain You hate Jews. Just say it

The Judeo-Protestant alliance has run the world for well over 300 years now, this is an easy call

@mookjuice @ChristianHeiens Dawg you had two earnest attempts at dialogue replying to literally this post and you “bot, blocked” them lol. Really bizarre tactics, more Boomer than third world tbh I’m real name facefgging but I’m probably a bot too

@ChristianHeiens It’s very strange how me wanting a uniform immigration ban and not wanting H1Bs to be singled out and me defending my religion is a cause for ending 3rd world immigration. But then again you people are bad faith and can’t make an argument without lying and gaslighting

I could not have asked for a better tweet that encapsulates this phenomenon. This is exactly why we need to ban immigration from all third world nations, including India.

@pfftlecakes @spin565656 It’s people who eat all-natural peanut butter (as opposed to Jiffy or w/e) self-selecting into engagement with the topic.

@spin565656 As someone from the US, I think the misunderstanding is that peanut butter is not considered sweet in comparison to other American foods. Most US peanut butter is incredibly sweet. This is mine. Over a gram of sugar PER TABLESPOON.

ちょっと待って！ ピーナッツバターが甘くないってどう言う事？？？

@Monkeyiobe @ChristianHeiens “We’re not so different, you and I” says the side literally mass importing hostile foreigners

@ChristianHeiens While Red Monkey and Blue Monkey are busy drawing battle lines, the Gorilla is sitting comfortable, because a divided jungle never looks up. The real power move isn't secession or domination .... it's keeping Monkeys distracted fighting each other. Works every time.

There will be no national divorce because the Left will never permit one. If Red States tried to secede, the Left gets to do what they love doing, which is temporarily cast aside their explicitly anti-American hatred and LARP as the Union in the American Civil War. Their rallying cry will be that the trans youth of Mississippi are being oppressed, and that it would be a failure of Progressive morality for Blue State America to permit Red State America to leave the Union just so they can enact their racism, sexism, transphobia, Islamophobia, and all the other -isms and -phobias that the Left endlessly moralizes about as the root of all social evils. They’ll never permit it. They will quite literally fight a civil war to keep Red States in the Union, by pointing to Blue clusters within them that need to be saved from their reactionary fascist overlords. So your options are to just surrender to these people or to take power at the Federal level and impose your will on this entire country, including Blue States like California and New York.

@BoredElonMusk When you’re making a shitpost but it’s not a shit — post

When you don’t understand the fundamental signs of AI writing, it’s not just lazy, it’s disrespectful to your reader.

@derzum_ @KaiserLoengramm It’s especially silly because two months ago any surface level political discussion with white PNW leftists was “fascist ICE kkkommandos”. Now it’s anti-war and anti-corporate. Cool. But if you ask for proposals: “Eat the rich” and if you ask who specifically: “Musk and oil CEOs”

@KaiserLoengramm Some posters on here really love having things in common wih the left

I am begging anyone who thinks that the left right divide is just some manufactured thing by Jews or by greedy corporations or by the uniparty or whatever it is attributed to, to go to a leftwing protest, find someone who looks like this, and try and find common ground with them.

@austrosillyism The Umberto Eco thing is especially true. His “14 Points” are outrageously subjective, can be tortured into fitting nearly every situation, and I suspect that is the point.

This is the reason, despite my philosophical contentions with Fascism that i don’t like the “anti-fascist” label. Like 80% of people who call themselves that get it from Umberto Eco and haven’t read about what Mussolini thought

Bruh. Mussolini makes it clear in the Doctrine Of Fascism that the “bourgeois” would ideally not be put in business and instead the working class would form guild associations like the Middle Ages, and that the State would have primacy in the economic role by having an interventionist role, guiding interests immanently. Have so-called “anti-fascists” actually read the texts?

@ItIsHoeMath @A_Wyatt_Man Look up Leather Apron Club’s video on Rogan. If he’s still around and not banned. I haven’t seen anything new from him in ages.

@A_Wyatt_Man I have been watching very little content since I began making my own full-time. In the past 3 years, I have basically only watched sam hyde, black pigeon, based camp, shoe0nhead, and a few miscellaneous youtube videos while working out. I don't know anything you're talking about.

@rodrigo91213801 @ChristianHeiens The SCOTUS AA ruling has been infamously ignored by many many institutions with no consequences. For the other case, SCOTUS has now ruled that district courts can’t do national injunctions and yet they continue. Don’t be shocked if they suddenly start enforcing it under a Dem.

@ChristianHeiens This would be a great incisive point...if it weren't for the fact that it's utterly wrong The Constitution works. It doesn't always work perfectly or fast but it does work

Ever notice how the Constitution was utterly powerless to stop everything from COVID lockdowns to the explicitly anti-White/anti-Male DEI regime of the last dozen years, but it's now constantly being invoked to defend everything from giving citizenship to the children of illegals and CCP spies to sending unlimited sums of taxpayer money to the Progressive NGO complex?

@RichardArion1 @ItIsHoeMath @tanomuzeA ~55% White, but that’s heavily skewed in age due to the Boomers. Every single American age cohort <45 years old is already minority White and it gets worse the younger you go. As the Boomers start to pass away, we fall off a demographic cliff.

@ItIsHoeMath @tanomuzeA America still is half White but it is on track to become 1/3 White without a course correction

🇺🇸現在のアメリカにおいて、 ノンケの白人男性が1番肩身が狭いと 聴くのですが、それは本当ですか？ その理由は何ですか？

@chriswithans Extreme levels of delusion on this topic. Saw a guy on here yesterday claiming that a collapse of judicial legitimacy would mean Trump goes to prison for his infinity felonies. My eye twitches a little just recalling it.

You know they do that because SCOTUS said Obamacare was not a tax but also a tax and that DACA was legal by EO but not rescindable and they saw Obergefell and Bostock and also how little Masterpiece Cake Shop did to stop Colorado's tyranny? And then they lived through 4 years of Biden creating de facto permanent legal status for millions of migrants while also letting anyone else in anywhere for the sheer lols? You understand this, right? SCOTUS said you can't discriminate on the basis of race against Whites and Asians and all the Democrats immediately said we are most definitely going to keep doing that, and no legal conservative said that was wrong. And SCOTUS said Biden could not forgive student loans and Biden immediately held a press conference saying here are some more ways we will illegally "forgive" student loans. And oh, by the way, the people very clearly voted in favor of Prop 187 and Prop 8 and yet the courts were like, Haha Elections Don't Matter. And the people very clearly voted for Trump and yet the Star Wars judges said you still need unanimous permission from the judiciary to do anything unless it's creating mass entropy. Rule of law keeps going one way and one way only. So that is why they are the way they are.

@planefag @CollinSLKoh The level of trans-Atlantic shenanigans that were going on in 2020 (and 2024, to a lesser extent) leads me to wonder if EU politicians would subject their own citizens to pain if it helped cast out Trump/MAGA and bring back the Old Order across the pond

What I find odd is that European nations haven't simply said "sure, we will happily participate in escort operations once high-intensity combat operations are over." Systemic and thorough degradation of Iranian fires bearing on the strait is mandatory anyways; Trump's caterwauling because the low-intensity phase, escorting convoys, is a numbers game rather than a capability game, and that would run the US fleet ragged and/or require under-resourcing other theaters. Escorts are to field whatever low volume/occasional attacks the Iranians can still generate after systemic destruction of their fires, as much, if not more, to assuage shipping company's low risk tolerance as for actual kinetic effect. So staking out their intended commitments now would allow NATO/Europe to: 1. Assuage Trump, who's transparently doing his usual boomer imbroglios at 3AM on his phone because he's concerned over gas prices heading into midterms. 2. Demonstrate commitment to the alliance but also the consequences of proceeding without sufficient lead-time, read-in and collaborative preparation (which requires little exaggeration given the relatively low readiness levels of many key NATO member navies. Even the US required time to shift assets.) 3. Telegraph to their own populations and markets that the capability to rectify the situation exists, that the disruption has a definitive end-date (or at the very least, will be heavily mitigated fairly soon) and thus settle market instability and other related destabilizing second-order impacts. 4. Present a strong and unified front to the US that makes it clear that European cooperation isn't to be taken for granted by forcing the US to commit to achieving certain preconditions before they will risk their assets on short notice. Europe has decided... not to do this; and the consequences aren't limited to the Trump administration - key members of Congress, including Lindsay Graham, are siding with the administration on this matter, which is definitely a shift in the wind. Considering how artless the administration's approach has been (and quite a bit could be said about that,) it's almost baffling that Europe isn't playing their hand more effectively right now. I am most certainly no analyst, but it's hard to avoid the conclusion that European capitals are genuinely furious. The Greenland debacle truly aggrieved them. That is no surprise. What is, however, is that no European leaders seem to grasp that the grave insult was the entire point, or why Trump was inclined to issue it. To be angry is natural. To be ruled by anger is... sub-optimal.

Increasingly more countries, even if ironic to say, feel that the easiest way to secure access is to get it directly from Iran, even if that means paying the unlawful tolls. You started the war without heeding warning that Iran would seize the chance to exert control over Hormuz.

@Danvir47 @RadPirateship @RandomSprint Took me a second to parse this. Racist? Canada and the EU are still White-governed. No, Zir Leaf: we’re not “racistly” assuming some brown will tip off Iran because it’s far more likely to come from a White leftist official. What does it mean when only *you* hear the dogwhistle?

@RadPirateship @RandomSprint You kind of have to believe that when you’re a paranoid racist, I think.

Okay, I get it now.

I’m worried about turning into one of those “Thing: Japan” guys, but they’re just so effortlessly Good At Posting and I can’t help it

@RichardArion1 @WhitePapersPol 1986 amnesty sneakily combined with Hart Cellar chain migration. A few million amnestied illegals ended up “legally” chain migrating 3x their number in only 15 years. It’s truly astonishing how quickly this all happened and that we’re supposed to pretend it’s normal

@WhitePapersPol “America wasn't racially diverse until the 1980s.” Actually until the 1990s with it being only visible in the 2000s

The core of the birthright citizenship discussion is really about whether or not the left can permanently insert the concept of diversity into the Constitution, thereby dissolving any concept of a true American nation. This has been their project since the 1960s. Anyone with any sense knows that the Founders never anticipated the kind of diversity America is dealing with today. America wasn't racially diverse until the 1980s. America was a biracial country that averaged 12% Black and 87% White from the 1620s to the 1980s. Over 350 years. There is absolutely no reason, zero, that the Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution as a pledge to uphold diversity through nonsense like birthright citizenship. If the Constitution becomes a national suicide pact then it loses its function entirely.