
Almustapha uthman
364 posts






BREAKING: Borno State Government reintegrates 720 repentant t£rrorists into society after rehabilitation



















No marriage in heaven ✔️ No sex in heaven ✔️ Sex was created for procreation and life on earth. According to Jesus’ teaching, after the resurrection people will not marry or be given in marriage. So to those already drawing up eternal orgy plans for paradise… you may need to request a refund from whoever sold you that idea. Those earthly things belong to this present life. The joy of eternity is not centered on sex, marriage, or romance, it is centered on being in the presence of God. So if your retirement plan for eternity was “unlimited sex forever,” you’ve been misinformed and lied to.❌❌




I understand why many people are concerned when they hear “Sharia law,” especially when the examples that often come to mind are places like Afghanistan or Iran. However, I think it’s important to separate the actions of governments and individuals from the actual teachings of Islam. Many of the restrictions people point to, such as preventing women from pursuing education or careers, are not principles that Islam introduced. Islam did not forbid women from seeking knowledge or having a career. Seeking knowledge is encouraged for both men and women in Islam. One of the greatest examples is Aisha (RA), the wife of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW), who was a renowned scholar and a source of knowledge for countless Muslims after the Prophet’s passing. That fact alone should challenge the claim that Islam seeks to keep women uneducated or uninvolved in society. Likewise, when people point to the failures of some Northern states and conclude that Sharia itself is the problem, they ignore the reality that selective justice and corruption are failures of human beings, not proof that the principles themselves are flawed. A system cannot be fairly judged by people who refuse to apply it consistently. By that same logic, no ideology, religion, or legal system would survive scrutiny because every one of them has been abused somewhere by those in power. It is perfectly reasonable to disagree with the implementation of Sharia or to have concerns about it. What is not reasonable is to reduce an entire legal and moral framework to the actions of extremists or governments that many Muslims themselves criticize. At the very least, we should be discussing what Sharia actually teaches, not what its loudest and most controversial examples have done.










