Bitcoin Cartoon

RNS Announcement: Bitcoin Purchase The Smarter Web Company announces the purchase of additional Bitcoin as part of "The 10 Year Plan" which includes an ongoing treasury policy of acquiring Bitcoin. Please read the RNS on our website (link in comments). LSE: #SWC | OTCQB: $TSWCF | FRA: $3M8

Good morning FTSE All Share Top 20 risers table. An okay start for The Smarter Web Company but lets see how we perform this week. LSE: #SWC | OTCQB: $TSWCF | FRA: $3M8

Interested in joining the community behind the UK’s largest Bitcoin treasury company? Whether you’re keen to learn more about the treasury model, The Smarter Web Company, or just enjoy a bit of British banter, we’ve built one of the largest organically grown communities in the space. Come and be part of it, all are welcome 🇬🇧 x.com/i/communities/…

🧵 @coffeebreak_YT, is wrong about Saylor & STRC. Not kinda wrong… structurally wrong. Here are 20 reasons he completely misses the plot: ~~~~~~~ 1. He calls STRC “not a product”… → By that logic, every financial instrument ever created isn’t a product. Markets disagree. 2. He compares it to a Ponzi-adjacent system → A Ponzi has no underlying asset. STRC is backed by the most pristine collateral on Earth: Bitcoin. 3.He mocks the growth vs iPhone comparison → He misses the point: distribution speed > physical product cycles. Finance scales faster than hardware. 4. He thinks the yield is “too good to be true” → It’s not magic. It’s monetizing volatility + capital structure arbitrage. 5. He ignores capital stack engineering → STRC sits in a designed hierarchy. That’s the entire play. 6. He says “no redemption = danger” → That’s literally how perpetual preferred equity works. This isn’t hidden. 7. He frames retail ownership as a flaw → Translation: “normal people shouldn’t have access to high-performance instruments.” Bad take. 8. He compares it to Terra Luna → One was algorithmic vapor. One is backed by hard assets + corporate balance sheet. 9. He says Bitcoin doesn’t yield → Correct… which is WHY financial layers like STRC exist. 10. He assumes dividends must come from cash flow → Wrong. They can come from capital markets activity + treasury strategy. 11. He treats volatility as a bug → Saylor treats it as fuel. 12. He claims the price stability is artificial → It’s actively managed via supply/demand levers. That’s not deception, that’s design. 13. He thinks raising yield is a red flag → It’s literally a demand control knob. 14. He assumes collapse if dividends pause → That’s one scenario… not the base case in a Bitcoin bull regime. 15. He ignores Saylor’s core bet → If BTC compounds at ~30%, STRC math works elegantly. 16. He says “just buy Bitcoin instead” → Different instruments for different risk profiles. This isn’t either/or. 17. He frames it as misleading marketing → Or… it’s simplifying complexity for mass adoption. 18. He underestimates institutional playbooks → This is closer to structured finance than retail speculation. 19. He assumes sustainability must be static → This system adapts dynamically with market conditions. 20. He’s analyzing it like a skeptic… not a strategist → And that’s the whole miss. Bottom line: STRC isn’t a savings account. It’s not trying to be. It’s a Bitcoin-powered financial engine wrapped in a familiar interface. And if you don’t understand the engine… you’ll think it’s magic. It’s not magic. It’s leverage, structure, and conviction at scale. Sorry @coffeebreak_YT, the lack of time you put into this shows, and you get lumped into the pile of all the other clueless bears who would rather spend more time FUDDing than learning about the future. It's ok...You have a lot of Logan Paul content coming up lol