
JAMman ⭕️🐂
4.2K posts

JAMman ⭕️🐂
@Bitcoinovercas1
4th year Computational Neuroscience PhD candidate - focus in dynamical systems analysis and its role in real time error correction






crypto natives are constantinople, tradfi are the ottomans, and the year is 1453 btw





The current Nakamoto Coefficient for Polkadot is wrong. Let me put it this way: if Polkadot indeed has a Nakamoto Coefficient of 178, then by the same logic, Ethereum should have a Nakamoto Coefficient of around 300,000 (yes you read that right). This is clearly wrong.


Faster than I thought. At this moment, you shouldn't trust any Nakamoto Coefficient numbers of #Polkadot. That number of 178 is almost certainly wrong. You shouldn't blindly trust my number, either. A simple Python script will help you verify -- just fetch transaction history of validators from Subscan. The most conservative clustering (meaning probably the highest number you'll get) will arrive at around my number of 35. It may be much lower, but until I figure out what a few of the big wallets exactly are (excluded now in my clustering), I don't want to overstate. Less trust. More truth.



Polkadot is trading at $1.30. Its all-time high was $55. And yet: → 43 independent teams building JAM implementations across 15+ languages → 623,000 TPS confirmed in stress tests. Kusama hit 143,000 TPS at 23% load → 2.1 billion hard supply cap passed. First halving hits March 2026 → Native Solidity smart contracts went live on mainnet in January 2026 → 3,500+ developers contributed code in the past year → Gavin Wood, the man who wrote Ethereum's first client, is building full-time again The price says "dead project." The code says "supercomputer in progress." One of these is lying to you. I know which one I'm betting on.
















