🐉 Jin Chan.573 'Receptionist in Antigua'🌷

Running plumbing 2.0

@CsTominaga Are you turning these papers to IP or not IPable?

Next paper in... Metering Truthfulness as an Inspection Game: Optimal Audit, Stake, and Sensor Accuracy in Tokenised Energy Markets

@___siggi___ @tuftythecat I wonder when will these guys stop popping around like a paranoid ex-girlfriend that doesn't accept the end of the relationship.

@tuftythecat Mr funny pants, taking things out of context. This post was about scale, not whether Teranode works on mainnet, which it does and has been for more than a year. Cope harder.

This is perhaps (inadvertently) the most concise explanation of why BSV is not Bitcoin.

Europe’s biggest infrastructure decisions are happening now.​ We’re putting the BSV ecosystem at the heart of conversation at #NBC26.​ Swipe to see – DM to join.

@ClioBitcoinBank @abaines911 @CsTominaga Dude that's all nonsense. Coins only move onchain.

@BlockExtreme @abaines911 @CsTominaga yes, the offchain object contains information giving access to the onchain funds and then when it is swept that offchain access becomes invalid. thats how bitcoin can change hands offchain.

Imagine being old enough to type and still not understanding the difference between moving Bitcoin between parties and merely introducing more parties to the same spend authority. Moving Bitcoin means moving it. Alice pays Bob by creating a transaction that changes the spend condition. Once that transaction settles, Alice no longer has access. Not “probably.” Not “socially.” Not “assuming she is honest.” She cannot spend it because the network has reassigned control. That is what transfer means. Alice no longer has a copy because there is nothing for her to copy that preserves authority over the moved coin. Her old key no longer controls the output. Bob’s key does. That is settlement. Handing Bob a paper wallet or seed phrase is not moving Bitcoin. It is giving Bob access to the same thing Alice may still access. Alice may have copied it. Alice may have photographed it. Alice may have backed it up. Alice may sweep it first. That is not transfer. That is shared risk. The concept is not difficult. A five-year-old can understand the difference between giving someone an object and giving someone a photocopy of the key to the cupboard while keeping another copy. Yet somehow grown adults are standing here calling copied secrets “transactions” and acting pleased with themselves. Bitcoin was designed so that Alice does not have to be trusted. Your model requires trusting Alice. That is the whole failure.

Did you know @BSVAssociation is one of the most performant blockchains in Web3? With a peak throughput of 70K+ TPS, BSV ranks among the fastest networks ever recorded and stands as the only PoW blockchain in the top 10 📊 chainspect.app/dashboard?max-…

The BSV blockchain is public and permissionless. Its value comes from the people who build & transact on it - This win is for you. Thanks @chainspect_app for highlighting just how powerful this technology is, we are very privileged to steward and advocate for it.

Votari is now live. Verifiable elections. Minimal trust. Clear audit trail. Download the app: votari.app

Electronic cash at scale needs fees that are practically invisible @BSVAssociation hit a new 30-day low in average transaction fees at just $0.000003337 High-volume payments become a lot more realistic when the cost per transaction looks like this 📊 chainspect.app/chain/bsv?rang…

High volume, global payments are a reality, but only on BSV Blockchain. Bitcoin is just a peer-to-peer electronic cash system after all.

It's truly amazing the amount of things BTC has become. 😂

@ClioBitcoinBank @CsTominaga Overlay is not lateral. Your idea is.

@BlockExtreme @CsTominaga Overlay service? Huh? Learn what merge mining is, we don't want a bunch of lateral use cases on bitcoin.

A key-protection scheme is absolutely a layer in the current “L2” sense people keep abusing. You can pretend otherwise by playing word games, but if you move the security model outside Bitcoin’s consensus rules and into some external mechanism for hiding, protecting, sharing, recovering, or transferring keys, you have introduced another layer. Not a proper protocol layer built cleanly into script. Not a rigorous network layer in any meaningful OSI-style engineering sense. Not a settlement layer. A trust-and-key-management layer. That is the con. Bitcoin script can define spend conditions on-chain. It can enforce rules through the system itself. Your scheme does not do that. Your scheme hides data, moves secrets, relies on copied or transferred key material, and then waves “indistinguishability” around as though hiding the evidence of the mess is the same as securing it. It is not. There is no proof that the sender deleted the key. No proof that no duplicate exists. No proof that the recipient has exclusive spend authority. No proof that ownership moved. No proof that settlement occurred. None. The entire security model is: “you cannot easily see the trick.” That is not security. That is obscurity. And in this case the obscurity is not protecting users from attackers. It is protecting the sales pitch from scrutiny. Because once people understand that the system still depends on trusted key handling, duplicated authority, hidden assumptions, and off-chain state, the whole performance collapses. It is not Bitcoin scaling. It is a con job buried under jargon.

@ClioBitcoinBank @abaines911 @CsTominaga That's onchain. UTXOs contains coins. Keys sign transactions.

@BlockExtreme @abaines911 @CsTominaga because the seed or private key contains bitcoin

One of our goals for BSV was to make building so simple, anyone can do it. The BSV TypeScript Stack accomplishes just that. A collection of ready-made components that make it seamless to get a PoC running in days. Breakdown below 👇

Think of Teranode like this: instead of one overworked employee doing everything, you have a team where each person specialises. Validator validates. Block Assembly assembles. Propagation propagates. That's microservices. That's Teranode. #Teranode #BSV

Yours Wallet walkthrough x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Is your supply chain data indisputable? Multiple parties. Different systems. No single source of truth. At #NBC26, MD Ásgeir Thór Óskarsson will discuss how @CommonSource_NL is enabling trusted provenance and Digital Product Passports across European supply chains through live blockchain deployment. DM us to meet in Stockholm 26-27 May.

Developer activity on BSV has been up and to the right so far in 2026 💪 Here’s a quick round up of some of our favourite Github commits built on BSV blockchain (in no particular order).

BTC: 7 tx/sec Visa peak: ~65,000 Teranode: 1,000,000+ sustained Not a typo. That's 100 billion transactions per day. Blockchain just outgrew the legacy financial system. #Teranode #BSV

Teranode was publicly released Oct 2025 after 3+ years of development. Now in production deployment on BSV mainnet. Source-available. Open for peer review. Built in Go. Infrastructure, not hype. #Teranode #BSV

BSV Browser v1.4.4 release pending App Store approvals. - Address bar swipe right => hide - Massive speed boost with native bindings - Choose your own broadcast endpoint