Evan Miller

If President Trump’s first administration is any indicator, antitrust enforcers will be keen to keep a close eye on competition in blockchain/Web3 as Trump pursues his pro-crypto agenda. I wrote a brief update on issues that may be top of mind here: velaw.com/insights/trump…

@MagnoliaRecord @MtJoyBand @MagnoliaRecord I'm trying to contact you via the support email. Could you please take a look? Thanks!

reserve your copy of our November Record of the Month: @MtJoyBand anniversary edition!!!!! with never-before-pressed acoustic recordings and a sick side D etching magnoliarecord.store/products/mt-jo…

First-ever antitrust market study on blockchain/Web3 launches in Luxembourg coindesk.com/policy/2023/06…

@Leerzeit @JoelKatz Enforcement and tracking is certainly tricky, but the DOJ has shown an interest and ability to find and serve individuals suspected of unlawful behavior. There are other, less technical ways too, e.g., otherwise anon folks regularly out themselves on Twitter, DAO forums, etc.

"All genuinely decentralized blockchain infrastructures - such as we have defined them [Ethereum] - should benefit from various legal protections, whether in law enforcement or regulation" Vitalik Buterin & Thibault Schrepel in "Blockchain Code as Antitrust", 05/2020

@Leerzeit I think it's fair to ask how, when, and under what standard to apply antitrust laws to decentralized technologies to avoid chilling procompetitive innovation.

@JoelKatz @Leerzeit It could be that, yes - I wrote about a near-miss antitrust conspiracy here: journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/stlr…. A commonly-discussed antitrust risk is that the blockchain could be used to share competitively-sensitive info among competitors.

@BlockchainATR @Leerzeit I guess I'm not sure what it would look like for a government to use antitrust laws against a decentralized blockchain. Do they mean things like punishing validators (or pool operators) for conspiring to set transaction fees?

@JoelKatz @Leerzeit They do not propose specific legal protections, but note that antitrust regulators should keep this in mind and develop a regulatory framework (e.g., a sandbox) that gives platforms the ability to achieve sufficient decentralization with mitigated risk of antitrust enforcement /3

@JoelKatz @Leerzeit This is a net positive if you adopt the premise that decentralization serves a similar purpose as antitrust laws. /2

@anothercohen They have children. And no, they don't go to sleep at 8. 😴

I don’t understand how people wake up at 4 or 5 to start their days. Do they just go to sleep at 8?

Interesting analysis of the potential antitrust implications of efforts to limit the dominance of liquid staking protocols. @BlockchainATR makes a compelling case for courts to use a reasoned standard when evaluating blockchain related matters. journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/stlr…

So, I know reasonable minds can differ on crypto regulation and policy, but can we not try to cause giant platforms to fail and create a black eye on the entire industry over it right when we don't need that bad press? Kthanks.

@nickVrusso @NBC12 Any chance the tropical storm scheduled for Fri/Sat will dissipate and cooler weather will arrive in time for the marathon on Saturday?

We officially hit 83 degrees in Richmond today, which smashed the old record of 79 set back in 1978! Warmest day ever this late in the year in RVA. @NBC12

Antitrust enforcers continue to eye the metaverse as a priority. The FTC's case against Meta/Within signals this, and on Monday two attorneys from the European Commission published an article arguing that enforcers in the US and EU need to get involved. eaccny.com/news/chapterne…

I'm not defending the enforcement action, though that the CFTC is pursuing liability for DAO members was not a shock. However, I do think we need to pump the brakes on the "DAOs are illegal" reactions - they further the chilling impact of CFTC's action beyond what is prudent.

(1) The CFTC has not yet succeeded under this theory; (2) regardless of its success, the CFTC does not argue that voting in a DAO is per se illegal; and (3) not all DAOs are involved in leveraged commodity transactions or other conduct that could violate the CEA.

If you are wondering whether the recent CFTC enforcement action will chill DAO participation, see below for your answer. This is a bad take, of course, for reasons below...

Ahhhh, simpler times.

"[W]e cannot arbitrarily decide who is accountable for those violations based on an unsupported legal theory amounting to regulation by enforcement while federal and state policy is developing." - CFTC Commissioner Mersinger, dissenting statement in bZeroX/Ooki DAO