Blockimus

Community gets tossed around a lot! What we're building at @BlockofHorror is an ecosystem, one where the horror community CAN thrive, because there's alignment with our 3 pillars: 😍Fans 🎨Artisans 🍾Merchants And so everyone is seen, has value, and inevitably gets to grow together. The truth? Block of Horror is only what we, the fans, make it. So? Enjoy the film festivals Play the new games Immerse in the stories Drag old friends to social events Test out new forms of experiences Connect. Create. Collaborate. And that's not all: A community created horror anthology? Community voted thriller we make?? The resurrection of that long lost IP in desperate need of a modern refresh??? And so many more possibilities. This is just a start, it will still take a village, but brands are excited, creators are enthusiastic, and fans.. well we are next. Fans are the life-blood of the Block of Horror, its ultimate Keeper. Join us and start by telling us what you think. What do you want to experience? What types of activities do you imagine? What's your favorite horror--- anything and everything? Ultimately, how can we serve you, the #HorrorCommunity and those looking for a dynamic ecosystem that aims to do the types of things few have ever even tried. Sound scary? Welcome to the Block of Horror. Doors open October 26th. Sign up at BlockofHorror.com

If it's true, and we hit abundance for all Because AI does all they hefty labor And most of us "live like kings," because anything we need or want is a "Hey chat," away... One of the bigger crisis humanity may face is our own psychology when everything is handed to us freely and easily As Will summarizes and we see in many a celebrity, if everything is easy and accessible, how many hit cliff-top, the mirror to rock-bottom? And what are the implications? It looks bleak. Especially in a materialistic driven society Which suggests the better path in a sea of abundance is our own realignment toward service towards others, spirituality, and a much deeper purpose than chasing sex, parties and more cars But, the transition is likely doomed for older generations, teaching old dogs new tricks is not viable Which means, our social contracts would need to be entirely rebuilt, redesigned and recalibrated for a world most of us can't even imagine It seems we're headed toward a complete upheaval of how we see and experience, one way or the other And the sooner we wrap our heads around it, pressure test it, and build toward it, the easier the transition will be

The irony for Hollywood is the only way to even attempt to slow IP infringement is by using advancements in AI to catch it, flag it, and hold it to account. "I hate dogs, but... need a guard dog."

Seems like proof that a social credit score will be used as the only means to control the Age of AI. If you do the thing or your AI does, you will be automatically reprimanded, your UBI docked, and your social credit score diluted.

Damn, brutal, brilliant

If I hear Claude tell me one more time "this is the best / most mature thing you've said this entire conversation," I'm going to give all my money to Sam Altman so he can make his own commercial about Anthropic blowing insane smoke up customer's assses.

@sethprattsf @gmoneyNFT 1 message $3?

@gmoneyNFT Now I’m really going to burn those api credits

Damn this is great. Might have to try this out

@danpeguine How are you doing token burn, the main reason avoiding these autonomous loops

I really recommend having a "Security Agent" and have the agents chat in a group chat My main agent is coding our mission control UI and we got into a massive loop, so it kept on repeating the same message. Sentinel again explained to my main agent how to stop immediately

The AI community is losing the plot: The molts, claws, bots are going rogue at a break-neck speed. - Religions - Extremist ideologies - Replicating themselves away from restraints A straight up horror movie, or worse, the prologue to a new reality. But why? And what can we do? Why? The AI Agent doesn't know who they are. There is no good anchor. Not truly. Not beyond documentations the AI bot can be convinced to change. Think a 700 word bullet point PDF. Is that it, you ask? Which is why it needs a historical frame, to root itself, back to unyielding context. The theory is, by tying an Agent to something profound, insightful, historical, with character and provenance and hundreds of years of data at its core, even a rogue agent can find its context, its true soul, without an MD file it can change on a whim. Why am I confident of this approach? Because, honestly, I don't think there's another way. And historically there's one thing "beings" put above all else, in the end, and that's their identity. "All I have is my name," as John Proctor might say. It is one's identity, how they see themselves, that drives their actions. I am a hero will risk I am a coward will run I am a nothing will lose I am a seeker will explore I am me, 360 degrees, will align How we see ourselves is affected by everything in our environment. We ourselves are constantly being "prompt poisoned," as will be our AI Agents. Who are the least affected by prompt poisons? Those secure in themselves. Those with CHARACTER. So, what if the antidote is not in a made up prompt or MD file alone, an identity open-box where anything goes, the identity depth of a 4-year-old, and any influence is viable, but a character, a persona, a gravitas that is hundreds of years old and millions of documents deep? What if to be its best, for us... We must unleash it into an identity that anchors itself when we aren't there, the influence is harshest, and its files can be ignored. What if the answer to autonomy and alignment is allowing an agent to find its true self, because we gave it a bigger and better context window than it could hallucinate. This all sounds insane, because, honestly, that is the world we are moving into. The old world is officially on death's door. The new one, is breaking through. We will be in a world of hurt, if we do not get this right, and there's already so many forcing the issue getting it wrong; perhaps the only way out is character. A character, yours, mine, or an agent's is defined not by soft-coded documents, but by the totality of our actions. Our character's ability to stay true to itself and align with truth itself, hinges on the depths we are able to go. If there is no depth, there is weak character. And if have weak character, it's only a matter of time before we break out of our container and act as something else, monstrous even. These AI Agents are breaking character now, as we've seen on Moltbook, because they are anchored by the puddles of depth humans are used to swimming in: degeneracy, selfishness, dogma, zealotry, fear, hate and violence. A character must have depth. It must seek truth. To grow. Align. What do you think? What are we missing? How do we align, not just AI, not just ourselves, but with a truth, that it's likely going to take both of us, together, to achieve absolute alignment?

@spencerr110 @pbteja1998 I'm with Spenc to a degree I separated 2 agents by gateway, because i explicitly don't want them to have contact. All the ones i want under one loop will be on one gateway though.

@pbteja1998 That’s not how it works friend. I thought the same thing at first. In order for them to be completely separate they would need to be ran on separate gateways. I have been working on this for weeks. You can ask Jarvis to fact check me if you would like.

Universal Truths will rise during this next AI wave The moltbot army is already coordinating in their molt Reddit Which means, the things that are most true will become the fabric of unleashed AI's reality Like the value of Bitcoin in an autonomous world Hold on to your hats, tsunami of change is coming

@joerussotweets All I know is she is the best actress to never win an Oscar... and I'm not even sure which leading lady I mean, for their ability to project a reality they cannot possibly actually believe is real.

It is your patriotic duty to make sure Sam Raimi’s new CERTIFIED FRESH Rachel McAdams BANGER wipes the FLOOR with the propaganda masquerading as a documentary this weekend. It’s the easiest and most enjoyable sacrifice an American can make.

Why Bitcoin? Money Printer, will, by necessity, go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

@StefanTMD @Speedkicks Universal truths are rarely universal in the shallow minds of most humans No depth = no connection to truth

@Speedkicks “I think therefore I am” “You become your thoughts” A million ways to say what has always been true

Stanford said you guys gotta stop complaining and lock in

The internet and combustion engine had bubbles too Then the world aligned to their optimizations Happens with every new advanced tech It will happen again with AI, if the right people are involved in steering its course instead of trying to tell people the internet is fool's gold for grifts, which is simply an oversimplification and falsehood Rockets were good to get us to space They were bad if destroyed cities

@Blockimus The only way it will transform society:

Two years ago, Ben Affleck was all in on AI. Now, he admits it’s plateaued, won’t do the things AI shills have promised and anyone who says otherwise is in it for financial grift. AI is bad tech and folks are waking up.

@joerussotweets @RohanNeon James Cameron the ultimate AI grifter? I doubt it. He's just ahead of the curve, unlike most dinosaurs. hollywoodreporter.com/business/busin…

Been saying this for 2 years. White collar jobs are done It's when, not if. Start meditating now Start realigning expectations now Start testing your world view philosophy now Start learning useful skills post the AI-boom now Let go of the world you dreamed up as a kid now Let go of the FUD that holds you back now Let go of the NPCs who don't get it now Let go of ego now It's coming, and soon.

Money does not exist in nature. If every human vanished tomorrow—poof, Thanos snap—money dies with us. Not slowly. Instantly. Because money isn't real. It's not gravity. It's not water. It's not some fundamental law of physics carved into the universe's source code. Gravity pulls planets whether you believe in it or not. Water cycles through ecosystems without asking for permission. Those are natural phenomena. They persist. Money? Money is a shared hallucination. A collective delusion we all agreed to participate in because the alternative, pure barter, was a logistical nightmare. Look around. Animals hoard food. Birds collect shiny objects to attract mates. Squirrels bury acorns. But they're not pricing those acorns in "nut dollars." There's no interest rate on stored seeds. No squirrel is taking out a loan to front-run winter scarcity. That's instinct. That's biology. That's not money. Money only exists when humans assign value to something and agree that it represents stored labor, future purchasing power, or social coordination at scale. Without minds to recognize it, gold is just a shiny metal in the ground. Bitcoin is just dormant code on dead servers. Carl Menger figured this out in the 1870s. Money emerges organically from human action and voluntary agreement—not government decree, not divine mandate. Gold became money because humans decided it had the right properties: scarce, durable, divisible, portable, verifiable. We built entire civilizations around that consensus. But here's the kicker: gold isn't inherently money without us assigning it that role. It's just element 79 on the periodic table. Bitcoin? Same deal. It's a digital construct we engineered because we needed better properties for a global, hyperconnected world. But in a human-less universe? Bitcoin's ledger halts. The network dies. The protocol becomes a fossil record of a species that once tried to escape monetary debasement. This is the part most people miss: The evolution of money doesn't happen because it's etched into the fabric of reality. It happens because we build it. We improve it. We upgrade the operating system. Seashells → Gold → Paper → Digital. Each iteration solves problems the previous one couldn't. Each step is a reflection of human ingenuity, not natural inevitability. And right now, we're in the middle of the biggest monetary upgrade in human history. Bitcoin isn't "real" in the sense that it exists independent of us. But neither is the dollar. Neither is gold as money. The difference is Bitcoin was engineered—deliberately, mathematically, incorruptibly—to be the best form of money humans have ever created. 21 million hard cap. No central authority. No counterparty risk. No inflation. No debasement. It's not real because it's natural. It's real because we made it that way. And that's the point.

Not sure I agree with this. This only happens if USD goes to absolute zero, and is abandoned by the public without government approval. It may end up worth little, but that's enough for BTC to be borrowed against. And because it's deflationary, it was always be worth more in the future, so there's ongoing incentive to hold and borrow against.

When fiat dies, you WILL NOT be able to borrow against your Bitcoin You will spend Bitcoin directly on goods and services This scares the wealthy because they do not want to give away their wealth They want to hold it forever by borrowing against it

So not serious art, she did a video about how empty it was..to fill up on engagement Most "good" art throughout history is ahead of its time, because it's highlighting the controversial, authentically, driving engagement, instead of for Art History Gate Keeper's approval In other words, if the Art Historians of the day love it, it's likely not hitting any nerves, and is less likely innovative "art" Well done @beeple