Bloom

@Options_IndiaAB 你看到了一些东西，但是你的思考还停留在表面。印度的发展靠你的这些建议是不可能成功的，因为这些建议几乎不可能被执行。印度如果想追上中国，需要先来一次新中国成立式的革命，对固化的社会资源进行重新分配。然而，恐怕没有一个印度人有这样的觉悟。

I recently spent 2 weeks in China. 6 cities: Shanghai, Beijing, Xi’an, Zhangjiajie, Chongqing and Chengdu. I went there with curiosity. Like many Indians, I had heard a lot about China through media, social media and conversations. I expected to see progress, maybe discover some business ideas, and understand what the country is actually building. I came back with a very uncomfortable feeling. Not because I found a business idea for myself. But because I saw 100 things that governments can do when infrastructure, tourism, transport, urban planning and civic systems are treated seriously. I travelled within China by flights, trains, cars and local transport. The infrastructure was honestly stunning. Clean cities. Smooth roads. High-speed trains. Well-managed traffic. Public spaces that actually feel designed for people. Tourist destinations that are built, maintained and promoted like national assets. And then I kept thinking about India. We keep comparing ourselves to China. Our media keeps telling us how India is catching up, how China is restrictive, how we are better in so many ways. After spending time there and speaking to people, I realised how much of that narrative is just comfort food. China is not perfect. No country is. But on infrastructure, execution, tourism, civic discipline and quality of urban life, they are not 5 years ahead of us. They are decades ahead. The saddest part for me was the currency. Everything felt expensive. Not because China was insanely expensive, but because the rupee has weakened so much that even normal spending starts feeling heavy. As an Indian taxpayer, that genuinely hurt. We pay taxes. We work hard. We talk about becoming a global power. But where is the quality of life? Where is the civic sense? Where is the infrastructure that makes daily life easier? Where is the tourism vision beyond religious tourism? I met travellers from other countries who were excited to visit China because they wanted to see its progress. When I asked about India, many had no real desire to visit. Not out of hate. India simply was not on their aspirational travel list. That should bother us. Even the so-called “closed internet” surprised me. We are told people there are missing out because they don’t use Google, Instagram, WhatsApp or Facebook. But China has built its own digital ecosystem. Payments, maps, transport, messaging, shopping, everything works inside their own infrastructure. People did not seem to feel deprived. They seemed adapted. Again, this is not a hate post. I love India. That is exactly why this trip bothered me. Patriotism cannot only be about saying we are great. Real patriotism is having the courage to admit where we are falling behind. China made me realise one thing very clearly: India’s potential is not the problem. Execution is. And unless we stop comforting ourselves with comparisons and start demanding better infrastructure, better governance, better tourism, cleaner cities and a higher quality of life, we will keep celebrating the idea of progress instead of actually living it.

@wuguaixing 日本人真奇葩 下次在店里喘气也征求下主人的同意吧

问题是，就便是在人情社会的中国、你用餐厅插座充电前也是会征得主人同意吧。断不会贸然就插上充电吧。还是这只是我的想象？

@qiaohuanxin 沙漠里画块区域，把沙子熔了，剩下的转化过程比较成熟了

【中国的逐日工程】只要在地球同步轨道铺设一个面积为5.5万平方公里的光伏板阵列，发电量就相当于目前全球耗能总和。5.5万平方公里，大致相当于浙江省或江苏省的一半，北京市的三倍。5月18日新华社报道，中国太空光伏发电的“逐日工程”取得突破性进展，预计2030年建成商业化的地球同步轨道兆瓦级光伏电站。 地球同步轨道，有24小时不间断日照，不存在地面光伏发电昼夜的影响，也没有天气干扰。发出的电，可以通过微波传回地面，也可以传给其他太空飞行器，用途可谓难以限量。 这也是马斯克的 SpaceX 每天梦寐以求的项目。中美，或者说中国对 Space X, 在这个领域的竞争，非常激烈。

@qiaohuanxin @jumbo88688 地面的接收的面积肯定要远小于太空太阳能板的面积，不然地面基建得多大啊 地面接收的功率密度应该是很高的 解决方案应该是选择不易被生物体吸收的波段

太空太阳能微波传输的地面功率密度通常设计在以下水平： - 中心最大功率密度：约 23 mW/cm²（或 230 W/m²） - 平均功率密度：约 30 W/m² 左右 赤道地区正午阳光的功率密度约 1000 W/m²，中国绝大部分地方正午阳光功率密度为800-950W/m²，微波束中心强度只有阳光的 1/4 左右。鸟大概会感到热，但远不会烤熟。

@jacksonhinkle Please don't put India along with China. 我们真的很介意

🇷🇺 "A multipolar world means no hegemons. Even with giants like India and China, no single nation should dominate global politics. Everyone must be equal." — Putin

@earthcurated Fun fact: 95+% of all non-chinese citizen have never traveled to China.

🇨🇳 🛫 FUN FACT : China ~90–95% of citizens have never traveled abroad.

@Beno10_MFC 993

High level of creativity is needed here. Boost your creativity Can you make a number larger than 902 by moving only 2 sticks?

@Getinwithgame 5，old enough to have ice cream.

If you’re wayyyy older and a young, hot girl asks “How old are you?”, don’t just answer normally. Flip the script and tease her hard. You smile, look her straight in the eyes, and say with playful confidence:

@QiaoJiaXY 这个问题就好比王老吉好还是可口可乐好 首先人各有所好 其次可口可乐的品牌效应好这件事到目前为止还是客观存在的

我以前也是觉得特斯拉相对于国产电动车有其不可替代的优势，直到我去线下看了国产电车…… 没法比，特斯拉现在就只剩一点情怀分了，狗屁不是。

@quan86284888 @QiaoJiaXY 实际续航 300 多公里

@QiaoJiaXY 特斯拉目前有一个半的优势，一个是电耗，目前还没有国产车可以做到，另外半个是FSD，因为没进中国所以算半个。

@hantf724 @WangNextDoor2 超充也不快，还挺贵的，真实续航 300 多公里. 只能说中上吧 我给80 分，最多 85 分

@WangNextDoor2 开过model y的都知道，驾驶感这一块是硬伤真吹不动。包括座椅也不行。强的是软件适配和fsd加超级充电网络。想省心买特斯拉准没错。

欧洲人是玩车的“老钱”了，所以视角很不相同，对于Yu7的实际操控，很多人都评测过了完全不如Tesla ModelY，也就说长了一个muscle car的外表实际感觉却很家庭，但是让欧洲人无奈的还是智能座舱和整体成本价位这块，他们怎么也无法在这个价位造出类似科技感的产品，就他们那些软硬件工程师的薪水。。。

@Man_s_Bible how about this you 1500 your gf 1500 she will have to take a 100 loan each month brilliant

My girlfriend is upset: We want to save for an apartment. I earn 5,500€ She earns 1,400€ I suggest splitting it evenly: Me → 600€ Her → 600€ But she says no. Since I earn so much more, it should be: Me → 1,000€ Her → 200€ She says it's "fair." Who's wrong?

@python_xxt 出口吧

很遗憾，摩托车不符合国内发展GDP的叙事。 张雪的故事确实好，但这个问题的关键在于，体制需不需要一个中国本田。 一辆摩托车售价一两万，一辆汽车售价十几万到几十万。背后拉动的购置税、保险、金融贷款、停车场建设、高速收费、土地开发，乘数效应差了一个数量级。 地方政府的核心收入靠什么？卖地和税收。汽车产业每年贡献超过一万亿税收，拉动钢铁、化工、电子、金融、基建整条链。摩托车呢？税基薄，产业链短，对土地财政几乎零贡献。三百多个城市禁摩的底层逻辑就在这里：摩托车不赚钱，对政府而言。 国家这些年财政补贴砸向哪里？新能源汽车购置税减免、以旧换新消费补贴、充电桩基建——每一笔都在把消费者往汽车赛道上赶。摩托车从来不在这个补贴框架里，连被讨论的资格都没有。 财政的钱流向哪里，政策的意志就指向哪里。 所以“如果我是重庆市政府”这个假设本身就难以成立，你让一个靠卖地和汽车税活着的地方政府，去扶持一个会替代汽车消费的产业？这等于要求它自砍税基。 再说品牌叙事，马斯克能成，前提是美国消费者可以自由选择买特斯拉，没有哪个州说"为了扶持通用，禁止电动车上路"。张雪的摩托车造得再好，消费者骑不了，全国主要城市禁摩限摩，目标用户连上路的权利都没有。（出海倒是可以的） 在一个产品被行政手段禁止使用的市场里谈品牌建设，跟在禁酒令期间讨论怎么打造中国的百威没有区别。 真正的问题是——为什么三亿电动自行车无证无照无保险满街跑没人管，合规的摩托车反而被禁？ 因为电动自行车够便宜、够慢，满足了底层出行需求，同时不会威胁到汽车消费。它被容忍，恰恰因为它不构成替代。 想明白这个矛盾，就明白张雪面对的是结构性问题，远超商业范畴。 故事再好，也赢不了财政逻辑。 山城重庆 不禁摩，但中国只有一个重庆。

@Collins69446 Ranked by Indians, definitely!

Powerful military in the world

@didengshengwu 傲慢与偏见

能推荐一部，你看了三遍以上的电影吗？ 好的东西就要拿出来分享！

@hsouncle 进评论区之前就猜测大概是 买进口／合资的觉得买国产的 sb, 买国产的觉得买合资的有病 要是预测股票有这么准就好了

很多人不理解国产的意义。那么说吧，二十年前，开车去西部玩，要么买陆巡，要么帕杰罗，牧马人那都是属于低配，陆巡二手价钱都硬得飞起。 现在西部的路上10辆车7辆是坦克，剩下比亚迪。几乎没陆巡什么事。摩托一样，有钱以前都是哈雷和本田金翼，年轻人摸不起的。现在小年轻都玩国产，管你有没有钱。

2026年3月29日，中国张雪机车（张雪820rr）在WSBK葡萄牙站成功拿下分站冠军！张雪的故事告诉我们：有梦想就去追，因为勇敢，我的人生才会更精彩！

@LRihu97117 @linwanwan823 人形机器人的终极目标之一是可以直接使用所有为人类开发的工具

@linwanwan823 一直没搞懂为啥要人形，履带式，四足不是更稳

最近特斯拉大跌，而且SpaceX要上市，就跟朋友聊到一个有意思的观点： 特斯拉是全球唯一真正掌握 人形机器人 量产能力的公司。 而其他人形机器人公司，都只是「玩具级别」。 Physical AI要真正落地，必须有个物理载体。 那个载体，大概率只能是马斯克的Optimus。 就像马斯克自己说过：我们为车辆开发的一切，电池、电机、变速箱、AI推理计算机等等，实际上都适用于人形机器人。 你永远可以相信马斯克。

@NickRicci5 @jacksonhinkle so what, Trump will hear your voice and make a change?

@jacksonhinkle China doesn’t have freedom of speech, they can’t be critical of the government or they get killed

🚨🇨🇳 China is the MOST advanced country on Earth, thanks to Communism.

@fanxihai @royxy 台蛙的认知真就蝌蚪水平 妈都找不着 特朗普说你妈的最新的福特号被伊朗从十七个方向干冒烟了 他们肯定用的 GPS 吧毕竟 GPS 那么准

@royxy 哈哈，真是煞笔，055发射导弹那个距离打航母拿什么引导？

055的对手从来不是驱逐舰，1000公里外发射导弹，只能是针对航空母舰。在055出现之前，航母是海洋上看得最远也打得最远的军舰。有了055之后，不是了。航母放出舰载机来打055，在飞行员返航之前，就已经没有航母供他们降落了。