Moon man

😹😹😹

@anietotylkoja Jakoś się nie dziwię że lewak jest Niemcem xddd wypierdalaj z tego państwa

Took an ancestry DNA test and these are the results I got 😭😭😭 Fucking kill me 🤢🤮

@coZmathebest @Discord_Lies The fa@@ots crying under this tweet as so pathetic lmao

@Discord_Lies The atheists are correct on this tho

Discord's atheist bible scholars strike again

@factualfoid @EdLatimore Sure, but never forget the fact that you lost to me, bitch.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore We will never agree, leave me alone now

Guys always use this chart to make the point that women only want the top guys, but they always forget the other half of the data. 66% of men send their messages to the top 1/3 of women. Everyone wants the best. It's not something exclusive to one sex. "You got the shotgun. I got the briefcase. It's all the game though, right?" Well sorta...women actually message guys they rate as unattractive. Men, for the most part, don't. Screenshot of that distribution following...

@factualfoid @EdLatimore Nope. Hypergamy = 1 or more man. Hypergamous beahviour = 1 or more man.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore Since they don’t fuck all of them, clearly there’s a distinction. You lost.

@factualfoid @EdLatimore No, because they can have a different man above their league irl, whether in the form of sex or relationshi. Then she might not use the men off of dating apps. If a woman wants quicker and easier valdation and uses dating aps often, she will always fuck/date man above her league.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore Do women fuck/date every man above their league that they match with?

@factualfoid @EdLatimore You have no argument for there being a distinction (for women). You lost.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore You seem to not care about the distinction between hypergamy and hypergamous behavior so just stop responding bc that’s kind of an important factor

@MJsztek Trzeba okradać hindusów jak najwięcej, brawo dla kanara.

Zawód kanara musi przejść jakąś rewolucję empatii. Mijam grupkę turystów z Indii, którzy kupili ulgowe na karty studenckie z ich kraju i zamiast już puścić i pouczyć, że muszą mieć międzynarodową to wlepili 4x 140 zł XD pomimo że zawsze mam bilet, to gardzę takimi podejsciem

@factualfoid @EdLatimore So you were vindicated that men aim for women above their league. Which isn't hypergamy. So we agreed on that after disucssing for a bit. No problerm? What are you angry about?

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore The chart is just “men also aim for women above their league” but clearly u took that personally and think it meant “men are evil” lmao not my fault

@factualfoid @EdLatimore Not all which is exactly why I said that women are MORE hypergamous than the dating app matches they get. Again, a woman cannot possess hypergamous beahviour and then not be hypergamous. It's not a real thing. You're arguing against it by claiming not all matches = sex LOL

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore Do all dating app matches result in sex/dating?

@factualfoid @EdLatimore >Replies to chart that she is vindicated >chart is muh men bad >reply that the chart is stupid >tHe cHaRt iS nOt WhY i WaS vInDiCaTeD yOu DoN't KnOw WhAt Is. >mfw

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore Bud u don’t even know what im referring to when i said i was vindicated which is why u started arguing about the chart and not about why i said i was vindicated

@factualfoid @EdLatimore If a woman is hypergamous, she will do things that lead to hypergamy. She is hypergamous by definition if she posses hypergamous beahviour., opposed to a man. So yes, dating app matches are the same as fucking someone, the only seperation is the time it takes to get there.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore No u didn’t lol. U said matching is hypergamy, i said it’s not as hypergamy is sex/dating, then u had to pivot and say it’s hypergamy bc it LEADS to sexual/dating. I have to say “hypergamous behavior” bc u think a dating app match is the same as fucking someone

@factualfoid @EdLatimore Which is why I'm here talking to you, not the person who made this chart.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore Yes, that’s why i said it

@factualfoid @EdLatimore I clearly showed that I do which is why you had to bring the term "hypergmaous beahviour" into the discussion in the first place, because you were getting decimated on the definition of hypergamy.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore You’re the one who doesn’t understand the distinction between hypergamous behavior and hypergamy

@factualfoid @EdLatimore So were you vindicated or not?

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore Then go argue with the person who made the chart, not me

@factualfoid @EdLatimore Y: "X is not hypergamy" M: "So are we talking about hypergamy or not, you just claimed women are successful with their hypergamous endeavors" Y: "If you read and understood my statement you wouldnt have just asked any of that" Someone's illiterate here and it's not me.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore If you read and understood my statement you wouldn’t have just asked any of that

@byzantinecopt You are brown.

@factualfoid @EdLatimore I did respond to what you said. My response is that it's literally impossible. How on earth did you come to the conclusion that the most attractive women are matching with average and less than attractive men. How. Men are messaging the best match they get, not top % women.

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore …which means the most attractive women are matching with average and less attractive men… just not responding to them… also that isnt that related to what i said lmao nice pivot

@factualfoid @EdLatimore So why did you write that your whole argument is about hypergamous behaviour if I wasn't right on hypergamy? We can go back to debating which gender is the hpyergamous once if you want but you clearly didn't have any argument which is why you goal shifted

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore Responding to a message isn’t hypergamy, it’s hypergamous behavior. Having sex/dating someone above ur league is hypergamy. Numbers, likes, and messages don’t always equal sex/dating but sex/dating is always preceded by them. Theres a distinction

@factualfoid @EdLatimore ?? You can't message someone you don't match with. Lmao what are you even talking about. Maybe with Tinder select which costs $499 a month

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore A man messaging women above his league and women responding to men above their league are equally bad by themselves however, since women have a higher success rate, the outcome of that is worse

@factualfoid @EdLatimore Did you forget this entire part of the discussion? Where you claimed I didn't know what hypergamy is LOL, you didn't mention "hypergamous behaviour" once. Numbers, likes and messages EQUAL matches and sex. Do you disagree with that?

@BlueEyedDevil95 @EdLatimore I never moved the goalpost, ur just misinterpreting what i said. Also, ur initial argument was about the numbers, likes, and messages, not the matches and sex lmao