BobJ

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Listen to science, not every single person with credentials. That’s not why the trial ended. What is your broad conclusion? Surely your only point isn’t that one singular vaccine isn’t as effective as stated. Why are you avoiding that. Lost in the weeds.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Sorry I thought we were supposed to listen to the scientists. Surely the scientists working at merck on this would know what happened. Lol

If a vaccine injures your child, you can't sue the company that made it. They have a special legal shield no one voted for. My End the Vaccine Carve Out Act changes that.

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul The lawsuit isn’t proceeding. Even if it did, what conclusion are you drawing from claims that one specific vaccine’s efficacy isn’t as high as claimed (95%)?

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul The scientists who spoke up are the evidence and their documents and the fact that the mumps portion of the vaccine is not as effective as merck claimed.

@YearRooster @Artemis1984 @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul You again? You asked a stupid question and I answered it. Now you’re back with an ad hominem attack since you failed?

@BobbyJBobbyJ @Artemis1984 @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Oh my God. I hope that first sentence is not true.

@YearRooster @JustMe762397763 @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul I wasn’t talking to you

@BobbyJBobbyJ @JustMe762397763 @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul The Ls often are.

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul You said they destroyed evidence and the FDA was complicit. Evidence?

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul to get over here before they destroy the evidence of what they are doing. The fda sat on their butts. What does your expertise and studies u read have to do with specificly what I said?

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Individual court cases aren’t evidence of anything. Jurists aren’t scientists.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Weird because I was referencing 2 very specific instances that u didnt seem to have any knowledge of. Then try to play the logical fallacy of the appeal to authority. What studies did u read in regards to a scientist literally stating I called the fda from my office and said

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Anecdote, not data.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Its a specific child in a trial who ended up disabled in a wheelchair and feeding tube yet her full reactions were not recorded. "Rigorous testing" makes everything safe when u don't record all the adverse events.

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul So you’re drawing a broad conclusion?

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul This actually isn't disputed.

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul I’m a scientist with an advanced degree. I know which sources to follow. I read the actual studies. You can’t ’think for yourself’ if you have no knowledge and refuse to look at reputable data.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul But I know it's easier to stick your head in the sand and say conspiracy theories so u don't have to think for yourself.

@JustMe762397763 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Haha. Blocked me. You lost.

@JustMe762397763 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul You have been dismissed. It’s not within your power to control that.

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul You mentioned a specific child. By definition, that an anecdote, not data.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul It was a trial. The Pfizer trial....not an anecdote. My evidence was the scientists who were asked to commit fraud while working at merck and decided to call the fda while they still worked there......

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul An anecdote? And a lawsuit? Seriously? That’s your evidence?

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Actually they r called facts. There was a lawsuit against merck. Their own scientists have spoken on this. There are documents and papers on the mmr fraud. Maddie de garray is also a real story. I love when people have no knowledge lecture others on knowledge. Classic.

@YearRooster @Artemis1984 @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Which one. Show me the study. And show me that you understand exactly what information is obtained by using animals in studies. You don’t.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @Artemis1984 @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Some have not been “rigorously tested before release”. In fact, at least one of the EUA inoculations was tested and killed mice. Still, it was released.

@YearRooster @JustMe762397763 @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul No basis? The entirety of evidence shows they’re safe and effective. Of course there are adverse reactions. You have no evidence those are a significant proportion, so you dwell in anecdotes and conspiracy theory.

Wasn’t It is you who stated they are “overwhelmingly safe and effective”yet have no basis to state that? My guess is that you would also say they are safe for everyone – – a one size fit fits all approach to medicine. Be careful about judging others as to whether they’re crazy or not equipped for conversation.

@JustMe762397763 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul You believe any batshit crazy conspiracy theory or bigoted opinion, so you’re dismissed. You’re not equipped for this conversation.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul All lies

@JustMe762397763 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul You can’t even accept logic or objective evidence.

@Artemis1984 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul You appear to be extremely predisposed to believing silly conspiracy theories without any evidence. Of course they’re tested rigorously before they’re released. You’re just not know knowledgeable enough about this topic and not guided by honest information.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul And guess what? Nothing happened. Please don't attempt to lecture me about rigorous testing when they can openly do the things they have done with no repercussions.

@JustMe762397763 @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul They are overwhelmingly safe and effective. The data disagree with you. Of course an exceedingly small number of people have side effects, but there’s no question that the greater good is to vaccinate.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul If they weren't harmful that wouldn't happen.

@YearRooster @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Who said anything about experimental vaccines? If you don’t understand how much testing goes into, that’s a “you” problem.

@BobbyJBobbyJ @TheDogeDispatch @RandPaul Is it logical to say that it is better to accept immunity of pharma so long as you have access to experimental vaccines?