Boer

Let's remember how Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (author or Sherlock Holmes) remembers the Boer people against whom he fought in the Anglo-Boer war. "Take a community of Dutchmen of the type of those who defended themselves for fifty years against all the power of Spain at a time when Spain was the greatest power in the world. Intermix with them a strain of those inflexible French Huguenots who gave up home and fortune and left their country for ever at the time of the revocation of the Edict of Nantes. The product must obviously be one of the most rugged, virile, unconquerable races ever seen upon earth. Take this formidable people and train them for seven generations in constant warfare against savage men and ferocious beasts, in circumstances under which no weakling could survive, place them so that they acquire exceptional skill with weapons and in horsemanship, give them a country which is eminently suited to the tactics of the huntsman, the marksman, and the rider. Then, finally, put a finer temper upon their military qualities by a dour fatalistic Old Testament religion and an ardent and consuming patriotism. Combine all these qualities and all these impulses in one individual, and you have the modern Boer--the most formidable antagonist who ever crossed the path of Imperial Britain. Our military history has largely consisted in our conflicts with France, but Napoleon and all his veterans have never treated us so roughly as these hard-bitten farmers with their ancient theology and their inconveniently modern rifles. Look at the map of South Africa, and there, in the very centre of the British possessions, like the stone in a peach, lies the great stretch of the two republics, a mighty domain for so small a people. How came they there? Who are these Teutonic folk who have burrowed so deeply into Africa? It is a twice-told tale, and yet it must be told once again if this story is to have even the most superficial of introductions. No one can know or appreciate the Boer who does not know his past, for he is what his past has made him".

Saai, is objecting to the joint declaration made by Minister of Agriculture John Steenhuisen and the German Federal Minister for Agriculture, Food Security and Regional Identity during the latter’s recent visit to South Africa. In this declaration, the two ministers announced cooperation on the vaccination of livestock and wildlife against foot-and-mouth disease, including a commitment to explore the use of mRNA vaccine technology in livestock. Saai wants to state unequivocally that most South African cattle producers and consumers will strongly resist the introduction of mRNA vaccines into the herds across South Africa. The organisation believes that the science has not yet sufficiently demonstrated the long-term safety of mRNA technologies. These technologies were widely deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic between 2020 and 2022, yet significant debate and unanswered questions remain regarding their broader medical consequences. Saai also notes that countries such as Russia and China largely avoided the widespread use of mRNA vaccines during the pandemic, and did not experience the same scale of unexplained medical concerns that have been raised elsewhere. Beyond the scientific debate, Saai warns that consumer confidence will be severely affected if mRNA technologies are introduced into livestock production. Millions of consumers who experienced the trauma of lockdowns and the severe infringement of personal freedoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, because they avoided vaccination with mRNA, will be deeply concerned about the possibility of being exposed to these technologies indirectly through the meat and milk they consume. This announcement also raises broader concerns within the farming community. Saai has previously challenged the Department of Agriculture and the Democratic Alliance on their policy direction regarding “fake meat”, particularly the regulations on meat analogues published in June 2025. Many farmers now view the potential introduction of mRNA vaccines into the livestock sector, alongside these regulatory developments, as part of a broader policy direction that could undermine traditional livestock production and place further pressure on family farmers. Recent events in Europe demonstrate how seriously farmers view such policy shifts. Hundreds of thousands of farmers in countries including the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany have taken to the streets to protest policies they believe threaten their livestock sectors. Saai will therefore spare no effort in demanding full transparency regarding any research, agreements or policy processes related to mRNA vaccine technologies in livestock. Farmers and consumers alike have the right to know exactly what technologies are being introduced into the food production system. Saai remains committed to protecting both producers and consumers from the introduction of technologies that may have uncertain consequences for animal health, animal products, and ultimately human consumers.

Rep. James Comer reveals that Jeffrey Epstein’s accountant has now identified five clients who paid money directly to him. 1. The Rothschilds 2. Les Wexner 3. Leon Black 4. Glenn Dubin 5. Steven Sinofsky

Vuyani Zigana has been farming since 2012. After an investigation confirmed he was treated unfairly, the national office approved that he be placed on another farm so he could continue farming. A letter from the minister authorised him to occupy the farm while the Department processed a long-term lease agreement. He followed the process. He submitted the required documents. He rebuilt his livestock. But after years of farming there, he has now received a letter saying he must leave because he is there “illegally.” Hear Vuyani’s story in his own words. This is not how land reform should work. Farmers need certainty. Without a lease agreement, farmers cannot invest, plant, or create jobs. Saai is standing with Vuyani.

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson responds to confirmations that the United States mistakenly bombed the Iranian girls’ school: “It may not surprise you to learn that almost all of our signals information out of Iran is translated by our ally and partner in this war, Israel.”

Saai, is objecting to the joint declaration made by Minister of Agriculture John Steenhuisen and the German Federal Minister for Agriculture, Food Security and Regional Identity during the latter’s recent visit to South Africa. In this declaration, the two ministers announced cooperation on the vaccination of livestock and wildlife against foot-and-mouth disease, including a commitment to explore the use of mRNA vaccine technology in livestock. Saai wants to state unequivocally that most South African cattle producers and consumers will strongly resist the introduction of mRNA vaccines into the herds across South Africa. The organisation believes that the science has not yet sufficiently demonstrated the long-term safety of mRNA technologies. These technologies were widely deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic between 2020 and 2022, yet significant debate and unanswered questions remain regarding their broader medical consequences. Saai also notes that countries such as Russia and China largely avoided the widespread use of mRNA vaccines during the pandemic, and did not experience the same scale of unexplained medical concerns that have been raised elsewhere. Beyond the scientific debate, Saai warns that consumer confidence will be severely affected if mRNA technologies are introduced into livestock production. Millions of consumers who experienced the trauma of lockdowns and the severe infringement of personal freedoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, because they avoided vaccination with mRNA, will be deeply concerned about the possibility of being exposed to these technologies indirectly through the meat and milk they consume. This announcement also raises broader concerns within the farming community. Saai has previously challenged the Department of Agriculture and the Democratic Alliance on their policy direction regarding “fake meat”, particularly the regulations on meat analogues published in June 2025. Many farmers now view the potential introduction of mRNA vaccines into the livestock sector, alongside these regulatory developments, as part of a broader policy direction that could undermine traditional livestock production and place further pressure on family farmers. Recent events in Europe demonstrate how seriously farmers view such policy shifts. Hundreds of thousands of farmers in countries including the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany have taken to the streets to protest policies they believe threaten their livestock sectors. Saai will therefore spare no effort in demanding full transparency regarding any research, agreements or policy processes related to mRNA vaccine technologies in livestock. Farmers and consumers alike have the right to know exactly what technologies are being introduced into the food production system. Saai remains committed to protecting both producers and consumers from the introduction of technologies that may have uncertain consequences for animal health, animal products, and ultimately human consumers.