Donna S

15.7K posts

Donna S banner
Donna S

Donna S

@Boo65864

Critical thinker, anti group-think, open to reason and debate. Usually polite. No DMs.

Katılım Haziran 2024
2.9K Takip Edilen2.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Donna S
Donna S@Boo65864·
Practice with the little fireballs
English
8
1
24
18.4K
Scott Jonson
Scott Jonson@Red_wine66·
@Boo65864 @dave43law @Nigel_Farage And my post still stands that the term is now most prominent across the pond & not something we see as often here today & over the last 10 years
English
1
0
0
4
Nigel Farage MP
Nigel Farage MP@Nigel_Farage·
What we witnessed in London at the historic Trafalgar Square, in a country built on Judeo-Christian values, was a group of people attempting dominance over our capital city and our culture. We are not going to surrender everything that was built over centuries and defended at great cost in two world wars for us to be a free, independent nation. The British people will not put up with this any longer — simple as.
English
3.8K
4.3K
23.6K
1.7M
Donna S
Donna S@Boo65864·
And now - David Starkey had to put him right - wouldn't even give Nigel any credit for Brexit. The bitterness is off the scale
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

Our party leader @Nigel_Farage has outworked, outfought and outclassed the political establishment at every turn for 20 years fighting to get our country back. He is the most successful British politician for decades and I'm honoured to play my part supporting him.

English
0
1
5
31
Donna S retweetledi
Richard James
Richard James@skisidjames·
Rupert was spot on when he published this post. Nigel Farage is the most successful British politician for decades. We should all get behind him, Rupert included..
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

Our party leader @Nigel_Farage has outworked, outfought and outclassed the political establishment at every turn for 20 years fighting to get our country back. He is the most successful British politician for decades and I'm honoured to play my part supporting him.

English
6
43
101
842
Donna S retweetledi
Claire Adams
Claire Adams@claire_adams694·
I read Restore’s mass deportation policy and compared it with Reform’s stated immigration policy, so you didn’t have to. This is not an argument against deportations. It is a question of whether what is being proposed is actually deliverable. On the surface, it sounds decisive. Tough. Exactly what people want to hear. But once you move past the headline and look at how it would work in practice, serious questions emerge. First problem. The law. Restore’s position is to leave the ECHR and reduce legal barriers to enable deportations at scale. Leaving the ECHR requires a formal withdrawal process. More importantly, it would require changes to domestic law, including the framework built around the Human Rights Act. Until those changes are made, the current legal system remains in place, where immigration decisions can be subject to appeal and legal challenge. Reform’s approach also recognises the legal constraint. It proposes a UK Bill of Rights and wider system reform to prioritise deportation where there is no lawful right to remain. Both approaches identify the legal barrier. The difference is how that transition is addressed. Second problem. Capacity. Restore proposes large scale removals but does not set out how the required detention and processing capacity would be created. The current system operates with limited detention capacity and significant backlogs. Reform’s approach places more emphasis on reducing inflow and improving processing efficiency to ease pressure on the system. One approach assumes expanded capacity. The other focuses on reducing system strain. Third problem. Foreign governments. Restore’s proposal assumes individuals can be returned at scale. In practice, removals depend on cooperation with other countries. Returns can be delayed or refused without agreements in place. Reform has proposed third country processing and bilateral agreements to support removals. Without those mechanisms, large scale returns are difficult to sustain. Fourth problem. Cost. Restore presents mass deportation as a decisive solution but does not provide detailed, transparent costings for implementation at scale. Any programme of this size would require substantial public spending across infrastructure, staffing, legal processes, and enforcement. Reform links its approach to reducing long term system pressure by lowering illegal entry and improving removal processes. Without clear financial detail, deliverability remains an open question. The irony is this. A party that constantly attacks Reform over employing Muslims has relied on a British Sikh and a British Turkish Muslim to help shape this very policy. Make that make sense. There is legitimate public concern around illegal migration. That should not be dismissed. But policy should be judged on whether it can be delivered, not just how it sounds. That is where the real test lies.
Claire Adams tweet media
English
6
1
17
341
Donna S retweetledi
Donna S
Donna S@Boo65864·
What is it with this entitled brat? Gets kicked off a TV programme for his language and behaviours that resulted in public complaints to the broadcaster, gets kicked out of Reform for bad publicity - and now wants people to vote Green to keep Reform out because they hurt his feelings. Heard of 'sorry'? The selfishness is off the scale. Me, me, me. The country can go to hell. Big Brother contestant George Gilbert removed over 'unacceptable language' - BBC News share.google/5U0jROG7Uzx5Qe…
George Gilbert@GeorgeGilbertX

Voting Green on May 7th. Distrusting Reform UK. Holding my horses on Restore for the greater good (no candidate is running in my division).

English
4
4
14
185
Donna S
Donna S@Boo65864·
@SirJBritain @GeorgeGilbertX So he makes the news for unacceptable language and behaviours that generated public complaints, some unable to be aired, gets kicked off a TV programme, Reform kick him out because of bad publicity, but you think Restore should mop him up? Are they that desperate?
English
0
0
0
0
George Gilbert
George Gilbert@GeorgeGilbertX·
Well, that's it then. Reform UK have revoked my membership. Rupert Lowe and Elon were right about them. Having been a member since before even Farage was leader, I have attended Christmas fundraisers with Lee Anderson, I fought their corner in public debates and I even travelled to Coggeshall to give a hand in their successful by-election campaign all after Big Brother, and now they decide to betray me like this over nothing more than alleged comments. Let's not forget that this is the party of: - Nigel Farage, who "engaged in anti-Semitic bullying" when he was a similar age to me. - Zia Yusuf, who liked a tweet about Robert Jenrick calling him a "traitorous zogbot with a Jewish wife and family". - Lee Anderson, who claimed there is no such thing as Islamaphobia.  When it's little old me though, they show you the door. So much for being the party of free speech. Two tier Reform. Previously, I saw a quiet virtue in standing by the leader even if you disagree with them at times. But loyalty is a two way street and now I see the wood for the trees; Reform doesn't give a toss about its members and they will throw you under the bus given half a chance too. I am not the first victim of their disgusting disloyalty and I won't be the last. I hereby offer my services free of charge to canvass and rally for any party challenging Reform, anywhere. One struggle. Get it into your heads that Reform UK is not the solution. If you want genuine reform of this country, you must vote for their biggest rival in your respective division. Hear me out- we’re playing the long game: If Reform UK fly through these council elections they will gain momentum that will frighten people from voting for a proper party that will be the true messiah when it matters more in 2029. Reform UK is a trojan horse of the establishment there to conciliate us into inaction. Don't fall into the trap. We must be strategic, we must be cunning. On May 7th, I will #voteGreen.
George Gilbert tweet mediaGeorge Gilbert tweet media
English
227
59
374
36K
Baz Zigar
Baz Zigar@baz_zigar·
@GeorgeGilbertX Without saying why you lost your membership, one cannot judge the merits of your case. Can you be more specific about it? Always helps to have full information before making a judgement.
English
1
0
1
130
Donna S
Donna S@Boo65864·
@WorldByWolf @Nigel_Farage Orwell used the term in the 1930s to represent a shared ethical tradition of Western civilization, to emphasize shared moral grounds against Nazi antisemitism and totalitarianism. The far-Right Jew-hating mob don't like it.
English
0
0
0
45
Wolf 🐺
Wolf 🐺@WorldByWolf·
@Nigel_Farage Britain wasn’t built on “Judeo-Christian values”. In fact, the Jews were expelled from England for 365 years and only existed either side of that expulsion in tiny numbers up until the 19th century. Want to talk about what the Jews think about Jesus? It’s not flattering.
English
60
145
3.1K
40.5K
Waqas🔶️
Waqas🔶️@m0w4q45·
Nigel, this is obviously bollocks If you want to talk about “defending the nation,” then tell the full story. Over 2.5 million soldiers from the Indian subcontinent fought for Britain in World War I. Around 400,000 Muslims served in World War II. They fought against fascism. They fought for freedom. My great-grandfather was one of them. So don’t you dare talk about “surrender.” We didn’t surrender to fascists then and we won’t now. What you’re doing is something else entirely: dividing people, stoking fear, and pretending it’s patriotism. And while you’re busy pointing fingers, let’s talk about your record. You pushed a project that’s left the UK economy weaker with credible estimates showing around a 4% loss to GDP and trade significantly reduced. That’s real damage to real people. And let’s not ignore the company you’ve kept including figures like Nathan Gill, who was suspended and investigated over links tied to Russian interests. That’s not “defending Britain” that’s raising serious questions about judgment and alliances. So no, Nigel this isn’t about “protecting culture.” It’s about you trying to divide the country again because it’s the only politics you’ve got left
English
7
43
383
7.3K
Donna S
Donna S@Boo65864·
George Orwell first used the term to define a shared moral, humanitarian, and democratic tradition in Western civilization against totalitarianism and fascism. He identified the "Judeo-Christian scheme of morals" with fundamental decency, human equality, and justice, separate from strict religious dogma or individual faith. He was English.
English
1
0
0
6
Scott Jonson
Scott Jonson@Red_wine66·
@dave43law @Nigel_Farage Farage’s use of ‘Judeo-Christian values’ smacks of MAGA-influenced rhetoric. UK-generated output usually phrases it more as ‘British values’ or ‘Christian heritage’. I’ve always suspected Farage gets more of his lines from abroad than from home.
English
1
0
3
53
David Bellamy 🇬🇧 #ReformUK
Does Rupert Lowe sound like the person able to unite our nation or just an angry man shouting at the wall?
David Bellamy 🇬🇧 #ReformUK tweet media
English
24
12
71
1.5K
Donna S retweetledi
James Orr
James Orr@jtworr·
Nick Timothy is right to stand up to the confected outrage of Starmer & Co. The attacks on him perfectly expose the extent of Labour’s capture by a sectarian client class. His response to this tantrum shows why he’s one of the best and bravest figures in British politics.
Nick Timothy MP@NJ_Timothy

This Labour MP wants me investigated and silenced. He makes my case for me. Labour’s rebranded “Islamophobia” definition is designed to censor us. So Mr Khan, here’s my reply: Get lost.

English
45
254
1.4K
19.9K
Donna S
Donna S@Boo65864·
@RestoreSco42708 @patriots777888 @PamLeigh9 The Adhan in public does not align with British culture. Educate yourself. I'm sick of your throwing insults about due to your inability to debate intelligently. Wasting my time. Goodbye. Blocked.
English
0
0
0
0
RestoreOrthodoxy☦️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇬🇧
He literally is, he is speaking about the public call to prayer used by Muslims in Trafalgar Square Also you caught yourself out You can’t hold both of those values close as they are literally direct opposites of each other Judeo-Christian is the equivalent of Jewish-Nazi, 2 direct opposites of each other Doesn’t make much sense does it 🤡 so your either lying or do you don’t have a clue about Judaism or Christianity and just chatting shit turns out you are both stupid AND retarded
English
1
0
0
31
RestoreOrthodoxy☦️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇬🇧
The Results at the last election (votes) 🌹 Labour : 9,708,716 (33.7%) 🌲 Conservative: 6,828,925 (23.7%) ➡️Reform UK : 4,117,610 (14.3%) 🟧Liberal Democrats : 3,519,143 (12.2%) 🍃Green Party: 1,943,258 (6.7%) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Scottish National Party : 724,758 (2.5%) Restore Britain at minimum will need around 12,000,000 votes to win the election WE CAN DO IT!
RestoreOrthodoxy☦️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
6
17
34
415
Donna S retweetledi
Reform UK
Reform UK@reformparty_uk·
The vibe is unbelievable. 🚀
Reform UK tweet media
English
45
100
654
10.6K
Donna S
Donna S@Boo65864·
@barewallart @reformparty_uk Get real. Rupes never stops sniping. Restore is a vendetta machine fuelled by his ego. Confirmed in the Starkey interview. Try watching it. It's painful.
English
0
0
0
6