Bottleneck Investor 🦑

580 posts

Bottleneck Investor 🦑 banner
Bottleneck Investor 🦑

Bottleneck Investor 🦑

@BottleneckFindr

Position on asymmetric bottlenecks Swing trading overreactions. No BS. No AI. No regurgitating other users AI slop.

Vienna, Austria Katılım Haziran 2023
119 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
Bottleneck Investor 🦑 retweetledi
光通信专家
光通信专家@tnglxn4·
@mathlonning 一个月后再涨? 这财报这么大的利好才涨十几个点 没啥意思了
中文
2
0
2
142
Matheus Lonning
Matheus Lonning@mathlonning·
Went over $TRT 10Q filling. Semiconductor segment margin was up sequentially QoQ. Which is extremely encouraging. They mentioned one of their customers is American and makes both CPUs and GPUs, who could that be?!
English
5
1
19
2K
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
Thanks, still gotta do an updated DD on it. But 2 Stocks I feel the same about are $RDDT and $AMZN, and theyre not even SAAS. Kept stagnating or even dropping despite fundamentals improving. Soon it will be like a rubberband where the price action will snap back up to the fundamentals. It always does in the end.
English
1
0
0
108
Cool Guy
Cool Guy@super_c00l_guy_·
@BottleneckFindr @MoodyWriter13 Yeah I bought 100 shares at $85. That’s held as the bottom for a month or 2 now. Just have to wait for future earnings because SAAS has been nuked.
English
1
0
0
37
Moody
Moody@MoodyWriter13·
I cannot recall a time when the stock market was as distorted as it is today. The valuations of many high-quality companies have fallen to bargain levels, while semiconductor and AI Infrastructure stocks are trading at multiples that price in earnings far into the future. Many read these low valuations as a sign of structural weakness. From my perspective, the clearer cause lies elsewhere. Capital is not unlimited. The enormous sums being invested in AI infrastructure are not available for other investments. By now, even the hyperscalers are investing more than they earn, they are tapping the capital markets. The concentration is not just visible in listed markets; it runs through the entire capital stack. The same pattern shows up in startup funding. venture capital is flowing overwhelmingly into AI, while founders in other sectors, even with strong businesses, struggle to raise at reasonable terms. When I look at the returns that sectors outside the AI universe currently offer, I doubt that the capital flowing into AI is being deployed wisely and will pay off in the end. What strikes me most is the resulting mispricing on both sides. The market is currently offering, at bargain prices, companies that will most likely still be successful ten years from now, proven business models, durable competitive positions, reliable cash flows. At the same time, it is paying premium prices for companies that might, in ten years, become what the unglamorous names already are today. The asymmetry is striking, and it is rarely been this clear-cut. Asset classes always compete with each other, and in a rational market, capital flows to wherever investors can achieve higher returns with a better risk-reward profile. The problem is that right now nobody really knows what the future return on each dollar invested in AI infrastructure will be. As a result, imagination runs free, and meaningful comparisons become impossible. At this point, I like to turn to the analogy of the market’s eye, in reference to the Eye of Sauron. When the eye is fixed on a single point, and it is fixed more intensely right now than at almost any time before, everything else falls into uncovered shadow. As an investor, you can choose between two paths. You can march, like everyone else, up to the gates of Mordor, into the place the eye is watching, and try your luck there. Or you can take the long way around and walk to Mount Doom unobserved. We all know which is the smarter choice. And yet, most prefer right now to go where everyone else is, drawn by quick gains and compelling stories.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ You’ll probably ask which sectors I mean. I’ve written about several companies lately already. I don’t own Mercado Libre, but it’s the perfect example. At these prices, it’s a no-brainer over the long term.
English
32
7
151
10.8K
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
Everyone who is investing and gauging "opportunity cost". Read this market commentary @MoodyWriter13
Moody@MoodyWriter13

I cannot recall a time when the stock market was as distorted as it is today. The valuations of many high-quality companies have fallen to bargain levels, while semiconductor and AI Infrastructure stocks are trading at multiples that price in earnings far into the future. Many read these low valuations as a sign of structural weakness. From my perspective, the clearer cause lies elsewhere. Capital is not unlimited. The enormous sums being invested in AI infrastructure are not available for other investments. By now, even the hyperscalers are investing more than they earn, they are tapping the capital markets. The concentration is not just visible in listed markets; it runs through the entire capital stack. The same pattern shows up in startup funding. venture capital is flowing overwhelmingly into AI, while founders in other sectors, even with strong businesses, struggle to raise at reasonable terms. When I look at the returns that sectors outside the AI universe currently offer, I doubt that the capital flowing into AI is being deployed wisely and will pay off in the end. What strikes me most is the resulting mispricing on both sides. The market is currently offering, at bargain prices, companies that will most likely still be successful ten years from now, proven business models, durable competitive positions, reliable cash flows. At the same time, it is paying premium prices for companies that might, in ten years, become what the unglamorous names already are today. The asymmetry is striking, and it is rarely been this clear-cut. Asset classes always compete with each other, and in a rational market, capital flows to wherever investors can achieve higher returns with a better risk-reward profile. The problem is that right now nobody really knows what the future return on each dollar invested in AI infrastructure will be. As a result, imagination runs free, and meaningful comparisons become impossible. At this point, I like to turn to the analogy of the market’s eye, in reference to the Eye of Sauron. When the eye is fixed on a single point, and it is fixed more intensely right now than at almost any time before, everything else falls into uncovered shadow. As an investor, you can choose between two paths. You can march, like everyone else, up to the gates of Mordor, into the place the eye is watching, and try your luck there. Or you can take the long way around and walk to Mount Doom unobserved. We all know which is the smarter choice. And yet, most prefer right now to go where everyone else is, drawn by quick gains and compelling stories.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ You’ll probably ask which sectors I mean. I’ve written about several companies lately already. I don’t own Mercado Libre, but it’s the perfect example. At these prices, it’s a no-brainer over the long term.

English
0
0
4
462
Cool Guy
Cool Guy@super_c00l_guy_·
@MoodyWriter13 This is how I feel about $NOW. cheapest it has been in years. Strong earnings. $30B revenue projected in 2030. Endorsed by Jensen and works with every large company in the market. Yet it tanks consistently every month of this year.
English
1
0
0
486
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
@UmidKD @MoodyWriter13 I agree and am also guilty of that. But with this much greed in the market right now, I think this collective mindset is starting to become very dangerous.
English
1
0
1
30
Umid KD
Umid KD@UmidKD·
The simplest explanation for all of this is that people want to get rich quick and they do not even care if the company is good or not. They want to make a quick buck and I include myself in that. Nobody wants to hold a stock for 10-20 years in a world where we do not even know what's going to happen in the next five, with the technological advancement in automation. That's why stock prices are so volatile all the time. Apart from the big institutions, who also do not hold stocks as long as they used to previously, barely anyone buys a stock to own a part of the company. Everyone is in it for a quick buck. Nothing more.
English
1
0
6
487
The Bentist (Dr. Winters)
Agreed . Although I would say though that moats will be obliterated with AI and more than likely IP law will go away. And with Jevon’s paradox we just see an increase in need and moores law can’t keep up with the compute needed. Even though it sounds counter intuitive I still believe this keeps going for quite a while.
English
1
0
1
119
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
Love the Sauron analogy. Then I guess we don't need to mention, which CPO/humanoid robotics hyper is Gollum, guiden the naive little hobbits ^^ So besides $MELI, what are other "high-quality companies that have fallen to bargain levels". Some that you put on my radar (and where I believe the price didn't move much + your fundamental theses are still just as strong): $MTX.DE $M7U $VNP.TO $HROW $INTR Would kill (or donate to a charity) to have an expanded list.
English
0
0
2
520
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
@mathlonning Please post once you see a turnaround in fundamentals or sentiment. Seems good value now even tho earnings wasn't good, but too afraid to catch a falling knife.
English
1
0
2
256
Matheus Lonning
Matheus Lonning@mathlonning·
Maybe if I sell some $TMDX shares as a sacrifice and let the world know I’m capitulating the stock will go up?
English
14
0
38
3K
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
124% rev growth, $7.8M in GPU burn-in orders still growing, and a 104K sqft expansion that screams customer commitment. That's $TRT. Not competing with them but working the same vein: $AEHR (wafer-level burn-in), $COHU (test handlers), $ONTO (inspection), $KLIC (wire bonding) ...each owns a different slice of the back-end. $TRT is the pure-play reliability testing bet nobody's pricing in yet.
@TrioTechTRT@triotechtrt

Trio-Tech International (NYSE American: TRT) reported Q3 FY26 revenue of $16.5M, up 124% YoY, driven by strong demand for semiconductor reliability testing supporting AI computing and EV automotive applications. Semiconductor Back-End Solutions revenue rose 141% to $13.1M. #TRT #Semiconductors #AI #EV

English
1
0
32
6.2K
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
$TRT just crushed earnings! What i really love about $TRT right now: $7.8M AI GPU orders and still growing post-quarter 104K sqft lease = a customer already committed, not a spec bet Penang location = dead center of post-CHIPS Act supply chain rewiring Insiders exercising options = they see something Margin compression is deliberate volume-building, not weakness Operating loss narrowing fast, inflection is close
English
1
0
18
948
@TrioTechTRT
@TrioTechTRT@triotechtrt·
Trio-Tech International (NYSE American: TRT) reported Q3 FY26 revenue of $16.5M, up 124% YoY, driven by strong demand for semiconductor reliability testing supporting AI computing and EV automotive applications. Semiconductor Back-End Solutions revenue rose 141% to $13.1M. #TRT #Semiconductors #AI #EV
English
3
3
19
9.3K
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
@MoodyWriter13 What worries me about humanoid robots is the tunnel vision, that people think they are the gold standard end goal, when they are really just there to reduce friction, by softening the transition from human to a robot workforce. I think they will end up looking very different.
English
0
0
0
255
Moody
Moody@MoodyWriter13·
I’ve been reading more and more this week that the humanoid robotics theme is now also being pushed by Serenity. So I guess we’re done with photonics by now. I always expected the story there would eventually end up at manufacturers of light switches that were supposedly “bottlenecks” in controlling photons inside buildings somehow connected to AI chip production or something along those lines. I was early in photonics, which also allowed me to shift my attention to other themes early on. In the past, I underestimated how important it is to let go of stocks in order to free up energy and attention for new ideas. I started looking into humanoids intensively a few weeks ago. After my research, it became clear to me that the most sensible way to participate in the trend at the time was through power semiconductors, specifically GaN. I even published a Substack article about it. open.substack.com/pub/fwriter/p/… That thesis has since been heavily pulled higher by the AI datacenter narrative. In general, it’s extremely difficult to build a humanoid investment thesis that truly holds up under scrutiny. Around 60% of the components used in humanoids will come from the existing automotive supply chain. Most of the value creation will likely happen in China, while the OEMs themselves will aim to be as vertically integrated as possible. More broadly, I actually expect very few real bottlenecks to emerge in humanoids. In the end, I think it will look very similar to today’s automotive industry: lots of suppliers, heavy competition, and only limited areas with truly exceptional economics. Until recently, Infineon, STMicroelectronics, and NXP looked like the most obvious investments to me. Infineon’s CEO recently said himself that humanoids could eventually represent a revenue opportunity similar in size to AI datacenters, roughly 20% of sales. At the same time, these stocks have already rallied massively over the past weeks due to the AI datacenter theme. This week alone there were even insider sales at Infineon. From a value perspective, I honestly don’t see much upside left here anymore. A few weeks ago, I wrote two articles about companies that could potentially benefit significantly from humanoids, but I never published them. In both cases, the idea may ultimately be better than the actual reality, and that’s exactly why I’m cautious. With photonics, you could clearly observe how increasingly weaker theses were published over time, while every single one was still labeled a “bottleneck.”In one or two years, you’ll probably appreciate that I focused on higher-quality ideas rather than repeating the same names already covered by others, the ones that eventually end up in the charts where the pump began. When it comes to humanoids, I’m nowhere near as knowledgeable as I was with photonics. Still, I’ll stay true to my approach: if I publish anything on the topic, I’d rather do it early, before everyone else is writing about it. I’ll revisit those two articles and maybe share them with you over the next few days. In my view, the real investment opportunity in humanoids is not so much in the robot value chain itself, but in the way they will reshape the world around them. That’s the question worth focusing on. In the end, it will be a bit like Star Wars, there will be countless different types of robots around us, and the diversity will likely exceed even that of a modern Disney film.
English
27
6
260
15.4K
Bottleneck Investor 🦑
Bottleneck Investor 🦑@BottleneckFindr·
@fedex774 Would be cool if you write your current fair values next to them as of today. I also have a spreadsheet that automatically updates and tells me the deviance from my fair value.
Bottleneck Investor 🦑 tweet media
English
0
0
1
63
Gus - The Italian Investor
(Still) Cheap stocks I like: $ETOR $ALPAS $ACUVI $NOLA_B $SIF $M7U $4X0 $AGP $ALENO $ALESE $LMND $TMUS $RDDT $BNKG
English
4
1
17
1.6K
Bottleneck Investor 🦑 retweetledi
Alpha Tau Insight
Alpha Tau Insight@AlphaTauInsight·
$RVMD added 10 Billion in market cap after announcing OS (Overall Survival) in Pancreatic Cancer $DRTS is expected to announce better OS than RVMD at ASCO this month, and is trading under 1 Billion Dollars
Alpha Tau Insight tweet media
English
7
4
92
389.8K
Prince Alpha
Prince Alpha@TradeReflects·
@MegatrendGlobal Hey, so Jane street are a market maker. They take on positions in microcaps primarily based on sized and volatility to make money arbitraging spreads and other finance magic. Wouldn’t read into it mate they are not a long hedge fund.
English
1
0
8
294
Megatrend Investor 📈
Megatrend Investor 📈@MegatrendGlobal·
The timing couldn’t be more telling! $OSS has just released a Schedule 13G showing that Jane Street Group, LLC disclosed a massive stake in the company. What’s most impressive is the timeline: On May 6th, OSS reported stellar Q1 earnings. The "Date of Event" for this filing is May 7, 2026 meaning Jane Street solidified its position just 24 hours after seeing those results! The Position: A significant 5.6% stake (1,388,714 shares). When one of the world's most sophisticated institutional players moves this aggressively immediately following an earnings beat, it’s a huge signal for the market. The smart money clearly likes what it sees. 💎
Megatrend Investor 📈 tweet media
English
10
6
67
5.3K