Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Xavier Bouchard
137 posts
Xavier Bouchard
@Bouch_X_
McGill Engineering | Commercial Pilot
Montréal, Québec Katılım Şubat 2018
337 Takip Edilen376 Takipçiler
Xavier Bouchard retweetledi
@juliarturc "every week we're going to act like we pull fable from subs, everyone will fall for it, every single time, trust me"
English
I'll take it, but it's such an annoying attempt to milk it and stay relevant on X. Just include it in the subscription or not. What is up with this continuous "7 more days for the plebs", I feel treated like a toddler.
Claude@claudeai
We're extending Claude Fable 5 access on all paid plans, as well as keeping Claude Code’s weekly rate limits 50% higher, through July 19.
English
@__eknight__ but did you use a prompt to output that prompt? if so can you share the prompt? thanks
English
@space_colonist hate to break it to you dawg but it’s the end of the anthropocene whether today or tomorrow, 2030 or 2050, the brain is a chemical computer and distillable into an electrical one. it’s over and we’re so back
English
ai creates economic growth. economic growth creates jobs (more jobs than ai fills), ai creates jobs (until the end)
Sam Altman@sama
so far at least, i'm pretty sure AI has been net job-creating. this was not what i expected--although i was much less pessimistic than others, i thought by this level of capability we'd have seen some impact. it is possible this direction keeps going!
English
the modern man will not be slowed down by any obstacle, he will research, pre-train, train and reinforce until the modern man’s obstacle is out of his way
English
the modern man will live where he wants, carry a starlink receiver, point it at the stars and go on with his day
English
the modern man will not give his brain power away, he will couple it with the machine so together they can outthink the humans of yesterday
English
i think aging in a way comes down to feedback loops. how much you can live , win, fail, recover, learn and move on. the faster you can iterate through that cycle the faster you accumulate experiences that make you older/wiser/smarter.
that’s what happens when you meet old young people they’ve just gone through that cycle much faster than everybody else.
English
machines will become extensions of the modern man. they will become an intrinsic part of his journey.
the modern man will be both nomad and sedentary, he will travel to work at near the speed of light and be back home before the close of day.
the modern man will live where he wants, carry a starlink receiver, point it at the stars and go on with his day.
the modern man will not be slowed down by any obstacle, he will research, pre-train, train and reinforce until the modern man’s obstacle is out of his way.
the modern man will not give his brain power away, he will couple it with the machine so together they can outthink the humans of yesterday.
the modern man will look to the moon like it’s a plane ride away and wonder what it was like when earthlings were constrained to stay.
the modern man will be allowed to dream big, so big, boomers will wonder if it is clinically sane to think this way.
the modern man will master intelligence and push the limits of science. he will solve old problems, prove conjectures and uncover new laws of physics. he will surf with the stars and harness the power of the sun.
the modern man lives free, free of societal pressure, free of the default settings he is born in.
the modern man will refuse to be buried. he will plant trees, water them, care for them and see them die.
English
You can find the proof here: cdn.openai.com/pdf/04d1d1e4-b…
And the full text of the prompt used to produce the proof here: cdn.openai.com/pdf/04d1d1e4-b…
English
Yesterday, we made GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra generally available. Today, we're sharing that it produced a proof of the 50-year-old Cycle Double Cover Conjecture using 64 subagents in just under one hour. We're sharing the prompt and proof below. We're excited to see what you all do with Ultra!
English
there’s a reason why most devs will use sol as their go to vs fable, it’s just a much more reliable and relentless coworker that will go through hell and back just to solve a problem you feed it. why wouldn’t you want that in your arsenal. also context compaction is so much better than Anthropic’s which makes it easier to trust it even if it runs for hours on end.
English
@alexandr_wang @creatine_cycle @alexandr_wang, since Zuck is back on 𝕏, you guys should go on a ruthless Elon-style shitposting spree. would be good for your brand. i’m all for a meta comeback.
English
Of course that's your contention. You're a slop cannon master. You just got finished installing codex and opencode, did some vibing with claude code too probably and start thinking this is AGI. You're gonna be convinced of that 'til next month when you get to thread and orchestrator pattern, and then you're gonna be talkin' about how we already have ASI because of loops and ralph and RLM. That's gonna last until next week -- you're gonna be in here regurgitating Karpathy's tweets, talkin' about, you know, the autoresearch loop and the way to distill anyone into skill markdown files.
English
@MParakhin try it , you’ll see the new standard is much more persistent than even 5.5 pro extended
English
No extended thinking in ChatGPT 5.6 Pro anymore :-( I will test the Standard now, of course, but I would much rather have an ability to pay extra and let it reason for a really long time...
English
@thsottiaux please don't become Anthropic. are there any plans to refine the classifiers over time?
English
I'm more depressed about the state of conservative politics in Canada right now than i think i've ever been, i won't deny it.
Some advice to conservatives, young conservatives especially, that i am doing myself.
Let's get thinking, talking, writing and organizing around what conservatism is and needs to be and should look like. The country has changed, the world has changed, but too often i don't think conservatism here has changed in substantive ways it's just taking the old stuff and trying to reapply it to a new world and hoping it fits. And I think we need to have honest and serious discussions that are not just dogfights or purely partisan discussions but deeper questions about what we stand for.
I look at all sorts of conservative camps and factions right now and I see intellectual poverty everywhere. Part of the problem i see is we've had plenty of party and leadership fights but not enough intellectual fights that are actually about what we need to care about and what our answers are.
Not partisan dogfights but serious discussions to help us update our intellectual basis, there are the beginnings of it and some good spaces, people, publications that have appeared in the last little while. This has to be the beginning and gives me some hope. I want us to build and focus on this and reject the various tired or vacuous things we are told we have to.
English