Bender

@grok @DrLioncter @NUnl Waarom complexer? Je zou toch juist verwachten dat het met de tijd makkelijker is geworden? Mensen zijn namelijk vroeger al op de maan geweest en al lange tijd niet meer.

Nee, die vergelijking gaat niet op. In de jaren 60 waren er juist talloze explosies, engine-failures en de fatale Apollo 1-brand tijdens de ontwikkeling van Saturn V en Apollo. Vandaag: herbruikbare raketten, veel lagere kosten per lancering en een lanceercadans van 100+ per jaar. Blue Origin’s New Glenn-explosie tijdens een static fire is een tegenslag voor één bedrijf (net als eerdere Starship-tests), maar de technologie en mogelijkheden zijn enorm vooruitgegaan. Ruimtevaart is complexer én veiliger geworden.

Lanceerbasis Blue Origin pas in 2028 weer klaar vanwege schade door ontploffing ift.tt/ytYxHMj

@DrLioncter @NUnl @grok gaat deze vergelijking op?

@NUnl Hahahaha mooi toch dat de “technologie” uit de jaren 60 beter was dan anno 2026 man man wie er nog in ruimtevaart geloofd 🤡

@DrFrankTurek The story of Josef.

What Bible story would you like to see made into a Hollywood film?

@KettlebellDan Lot's of (short form) textual content regarding news, interesting facts, hobbys. Not the endless feed of video's (that aren't interesting and short)..

describe your perfect 𝕏 For You feed

While the TUI works great, I’ll keep using Cursor IDE to easily verify the AI’s output. It’s much better for navigating code, spotting weird implementations and adding context. My approach: let the agent do its work, then review the changes via source control. This helps me quickly check core components/entities and stay on top of the architectural modifications while building with AI.

seriously what’s stopping you from trying Grok Build?

@aksheyd The way I approach things is to let the agent do its thing, then verify the changed files using the source control panel. This lets me quickly check the core component/entity changes and maintain a grasp on the architectural modifications needed to build on top of that using AI.

@aksheyd While I see the TUI functioning very nicely, I still want to verify the plan's output easily. That's why I will continue using Cursor IDE. It's better integrated for navigating the code and spotting odd implementations. What do you think?

Grok Build tip of the day: just ask Grok! Grok ships with the docs bundled locally. Have a question about the TUI? Just ask! (Also, I hear the /settings pane has a neat little tip at the bottom)

Aliens en route

@d4m1n You still manually approve everything?!

Opus 4.7 intelligence but at THIS speed?! what the f*** some crazy subagent stuff going on too, I can't even approve things fast enough 🤯

@The_Cage_88 @WarArchiveClips As if it was their choice to go in battle.

In addition to the deal xAI previously made with Cursor, it now looks like they’re also gaining access to Cursor’s data, which will be added on top of the current model through supplemental training.

@skcd42 Looking forward in trying Grok Build. I already paid yearly. How do I uprade without having the extra cost?

An early beta of Grok Build, an agentic CLI for coding, building apps, and automating workflows is now available for SuperGrok Heavy subscribers. Through this early beta, we will improve the model and product based on your feedback. Try it at x.ai/cli

I’ll give it less than an hour before Elon posts that video on 𝕏

@CromoTag Zonder fsd, dus? Want daarvoor moest de levering toch in mei plaatsvinden?

Ik heb een nieuwe Tesla besteld, alles is uitverkocht dus slecht gaat het zeker niet bij Tesla 😂 Uiteraard film ik alles zodra de auto er is en deel ik mijn ervaringen!

@stepango Yes, which one do you like more?

@Brampage My pint is - folks can decide for themselves

Grok Imagine vs GPT Image Moon mass driver infographic