Brandon Ballard
204 posts

Brandon Ballard
@BrandonBal9508
Filmmaker and content creator
Redding, CA Katılım Eylül 2023
211 Takip Edilen52 Takipçiler

@doqholliday In a world full of bots, ai, grifters, traitors, saboteurs, intel ops, etc…
I’m very appreciative for positive real people like Doq and others. Thanks for sharing the research, insights and good vibes for us lurkers out there
English

Please turd of cat… can you give us at least one reason why you haven’t found anything weird with E Kirk situation?
Even if it’s a half baked or sarcastic reason it would be preferable to just the annoying personal attacks you make.
Some of us are honestly trying to figure this out and been starting to get sketched out by not only EK but the responses of trusted maga influencers in the wake of it.
Didn’t you guys used to make fun of the lefties for ad hominem attacks over facts and logical arguments?
What changed?
Really hope it’s not ‘special’ new sponsors telling you guys what to say…
Sincerely,
Fan of yours since ‘16 election
English

@0xleegenz You forgot to add “important election year” in front of those virus break outs.
And you can go back further than that..
Notice how all the outbreaks are on even years?
English
Brandon Ballard retweetledi

Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans.
Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable.
Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale.
Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné.
Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut.
À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol.
Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée.
Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit.
Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie.
Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags.
Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle.
Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère.
Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision :
"La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne)
"La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek
"Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt
Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.
Julia ひ@lifeimitatlife
Depuis tout à l'heure je me renseigne sur les idées de Karl Marx sincèrement je n'arrive pas à comprendre comment on peut être pour le capitalisme et même plus généralement être de droite
Français

@Swit_zee If Korra was a man everyone would hate on him for being an arrogant prick who strings along multiple women.
That’s why we don’t like her as much. Korra just isn’t an honorable character. Doesn’t have the balanced personality of an avatar.
English

@hayleyafterriot @Eazy_Enoch Don’t forget blood bending 🩸
English

@JimmyTrue17 @ElijahSchaffer Because she watched her father go through the Bolshevik takeover of Russia and saw the same pattern happening in US
English

🚨 WTF is going on in our government?
Mysterious vanishings/deaths tied to US nuclear/scientific secrets:
“1. Melissa Casias: LANL (NM nuclear) admin vanished June 26 2025 walking; phones reset.
2. Monica Reza: NASA missile tech vanished June 22 2025 CA hike.
3. Gen. McCasland: ex-AFRL (nuclear) vanished Feb 27 2026 NM hike.
4. Carl Grillmair: Caltech missile tracking shot dead Feb 16 2026 CA.
5. Nuno Loureiro: Nuclear fusion shot dead Dec 2025 MA.
6. Jason Thomas: Pharma researcher dead Mar 17 2026 MA lake.”
- DailyMail

English

Brandon Ballard retweetledi

I’ve called out Candace Owens for her reckless accusations, along with Ian & others
But I have to say…. this recent influencer campaign of “hate everyone who isn’t in direct lockstep with the FBI’s narrative” is making my red flags shoot up
There’s too many inconsistencies in the main stream story we’ve been told. Same with the Las Vegas Shooting, 9/11, and Thomas Crooks.
We’re not being told the truth. It’s that simple. I don’t want to ostracize everyone who doesn’t go along with what these letter agencies tell us. Because if there’s anything that I know, it’s that the government lies. All. The. Time.
That means you have to be eternally vigilant, even when “your guy” is in power. I don’t like how this first year has gone with the Trump administration. Sure feels like digital ID is right around the corner with the next crisis. Trump has become buddy buddy with Palantr.
And it’s not like we’ve toned down our involvement with the Middle East, or stopped foreign aid, or made a significant dent on deporting illegals.
What happened to the seditious 6?
What happened in Fort Knox?
What happened to codifying the doge cuts?
What happened to being fiscally responsible?
What happened to prosecuting Fauci?
Trump told us to move on from Epstein.
Now the FBI & TurningPoint is telling us to move on from the Kirk assassination. It was just some trans lover with a grudge against Kirk….
My job as a patriotic citizen is to be skeptical of what the government tells us. Trust but verify…. I’ve just been having a reeeaaaaal difficult time verifying as of late.
I don’t like how Candace runs her “investigation” in a murder drama esc way to grab attention. I don’t like slinging accusations at potential innocents off of a hunch or anonymous tips…
But I really don’t like a giant smear campaign against everyone who doesn’t toe the line. That really erks me the wrong way and makes me want to do the opposite just to see what happens
My faith is in Christ. Not MAGA, not large creators, or smear merchants online (loomer).
I’m eager for this trial because I really think it’ll prove to be a bogus story with a patsy like Robinson going to prison. & it’ll be wrapped up in a nice little bow of it being just another lone wolf. 🙄
So to answer your question Catturd… tribalism. Charlie Kirk was a good man, and it’s really hard to believe that maybe some people who you thought were good… could be in on his death. But we’ll never find the truth without asking uncomfortable questions.
You don’t end a satanic death cult by being nice.
Catturd ™@catturd2
I have a question, and I’m serious … Why are all of us who never personally knew Charlie Kirk, defending his wife and children so vigorously - while the grifters who claim to be his best friends are too cowardly to even call that evil POS Candice Owens out? I’m so glad I don’t have fake friends like this.
English
Brandon Ballard retweetledi
Brandon Ballard retweetledi

Consider this closely, and ask yourself if this could explain some of the 'flips' we've been seeing, especially recently.
Who is going all out to erode trust in @POTUS? Who is going all out to fracture MAGA? Who is going all out telling you MAGA is dead?
ALL assets deployed.

English

@donwinslow *your* world yes.
The matrix is coming down and we’re taking note of all the agents exposing themselves ;)
English

Do you think the Candace/Tucker stuff is part of ‘full control’?
Was noticing on the left side of social media they are getting exposed to all sorts of topics through this bleed over from certain. (Mk, monarch, Epstein, satanic stuff, etc)
Sometimes distance from Trump is only way to get ears to open over on the left.
Feels a bit like the the left <> right paradigm is beginning to become more of a circle. The beginning of unity (albeit painful right now…)
English

Patriots, here’s my take: People are getting way too caught up in the Candace Owens debate drama. We KNOW who the real enemy is—the Satanic deep state.
They’re literally scheming to take over our world and enslave us all.
I’m staying in my swim lane. I’m not getting distracted by this noise. I’m focusing on one thing: Exposing the deep state, exposing child trafficking, and exposing those trying to take our Republic.
That’s where our fight is.
The inversion ends here. Q Drop 100 laid it out: Satan. Who follows? The elites pulling the strings.
Sun Tzu: “In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity.”
Hold the line. The Great Awakening rolls on.
Nothing can stop what’s coming.
Nothing.
English
Brandon Ballard retweetledi

Also worth mentioning I 100% trust Trump.
Since 2016 I’ve seen him do interesting tactics. Like distancing himself for certain people. Or vice versa for the sake of getting certain info out to left who hate Trump.
I have a suspicion about Tucker and Candace right now as being part of one of those plays.
English

Should be clear that I don’t really trust Candace. I just am sketched out by the things im looking into with Kirk assassination.
And the subsequent actions of TP (mainly the funneling of cash TP was doing to Superfeed Technologies) which Erika’s mom sits on the board of as well as one of the TP directors.
That plus lots of other data points about TP/Erika are really concerning
English

















