Brandon Paddock

Reinstating Jones is the last straw. What little I’ve kept posting here is done. @elonmusk is a lost cause. He has zero integrity and there’s no reason anyone should trust him or support what he’s done to Twitter.

@tomwarren Bad. But could be worse… cnn.com/2022/10/06/bus…

this is one of those headlines where you sit back and go “what?!”

@_LeadPoisoning_ @Jack_Raines That shouldn’t be the case! Edit mode is the default now in Word (desktop and web), and will happily make your requested edits! support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/e… (The availability info there looks a little out of date, should be available even more widely than listed there)

@Jack_Raines Ask it to format your document, it'll ask you to upload the document that's already open, and when you do, it'll strip out everything except for the first page.

Microsoft Copilot is a truly terrible piece of technology. If you open a word doc and ask to summarize "this document" it has no idea what you're talking about.

@Timcast No shit.

DUDE what if it turns out it was TRUMP the whole time with Epstein and Democrats had NOTHING to do with it

@instaneedsme @JohnConnor_US @bonkyandthebeat @justbenormalman @kylascan They do have lower centers of gravity, and it is a safety benefit, but it doesn’t really affect what you’re suggesting. Many EVs have lower, sloped front ends and hoods/bonnets for aerodynamics which also helps pedestrian safety during a collision. But center of mass doesn’t.

@JohnConnor_US @bonkyandthebeat @BrandonLive @justbenormalman @kylascan Jesus Christ. Do you not know they have lower centers of gravity? The location of the impact affects the pedestrians survival rates. Should I draw a diagram of a car for you too.

I was hit by a car on my bike this morning and can't stop thinking about all of these things

@StevenKerwin @Vampirology @bennyjohnson The Biden DOJ did not have access to those documents and could not make them public, due to what is now obviously some shady shit that Trump got away with. There was a grand jury seal on the evidence because of Maxwell’s appeal.

@Vampirology @BrandonLive @bennyjohnson Under Seal in the U.S. Government, and what the f*uck does that mean. Goodbye we're way too far apart, I really don't want to block you.

🚨BREAKING: Unsealed court documents detail how Trump called the police about Jeffrey Epstein in 2006 where he described Ghislaine Maxwell as Epstein’s evil “operative”.

@StevenKerwin @Vampirology @bennyjohnson That was not possible as Trump’s administration in 2019 had the documents sealed until Jan 2025. Very convenient, that.

@Vampirology @BrandonLive @bennyjohnson Good bye Anthony, if they had anything on Trump it would have been leaked in 2020-2024. Obama, Biden, Comey and Garland would have made that happen.

@StevenKerwin @Vampirology @bennyjohnson Maxwell has proven to be an unreliable source, and clearly her blatant quid pro quo after meeting with Trump’s personal attorney, asking for a pardon in exchange for testifying that Trump is innocent, makes any such testimony she gives in those circumstances totally meaningless.

@Vampirology @BrandonLive @bennyjohnson You have the same info what I have so in reply: You say "Trump himself gave a completely different reason for cutting ties with Epstein" where? "what's happened to Maxwell since?" we all know this answer don't we! Will you believe Maxwell when she testifies?

@erikbryn @victoralazarte 🙄 It isn’t.

@BrandonLive @victoralazarte I disagree. Well before I saw this post, I noticed that the main claim of the paper was misleading.

The AI scientist is here. This will be the end of wokeness A paper just published in Science — the most prestigious journal in the world — claims to have discovered how humans achieve the highest levels of performance. Its conclusion: child prodigies don't become top performers, early excellence negatively predicts peak performance, and parents should not push their kids for fear of burnout. I found it odd. I asked Claude to analyze it. Claude found a statistical error in the paper's core claim, designed a counter-study with 3x the sample size, ran it, and proved the paper wrong. The correct conclusion: talent is real, it's measurable by age 14, and it predicts who reaches the absolute top. We are not all born equal. The AI scientist doesn't care about your feelings — it just follows the math. Here's what happened: The paper (Güllich et al. 2025, Science) claims that elite youth and elite adults are "discrete populations" — that the kids who dominate at 14 are not the ones who dominate at 30. Its key chess finding was based on 24 players. It told millions of parents: don't push your kids, prodigies burn out. Claude applied Bayes' theorem to the authors' own numbers and showed the data actually proves a strong positive correlation between early and adult performance — the opposite of what was claimed. The "negative correlation" was a statistical illusion created by extreme quantile selection. Then Claude designed the study the authors should have run: collected age-14 Elo ratings and lifetime peak ratings for every super-grandmaster in chess history — 67 players, nearly 3x the paper's sample. Ran the regression. Result: β = +0.167, p = 0.003. Early achievement positively predicts peak performance. An AI just peer-reviewed the world's top scientific journal and won.

@ryancrf @realVernAcular @bennyjohnson @PoliticalGaffe Had Trump’s obviously BS account that he gave in 2019. There’s no evidence here to support that claim, and a *ton* of evidence elsewhere to contradict it.

@realVernAcular @bennyjohnson @PoliticalGaffe The court documents from 2019 had an account of events which happened in 2006

@rubytubee @bennyjohnson There’s a lot against Trump in the files, and that’s with his corrupt DOJ redacting his name and refusing to release the remaining millions of documents as they were required to do in December by law. Stop defending the dumbest most obvious coverup in history.

@bennyjohnson Democrats are furious that there isn’t anything against Trump in the files

@StevenKerwin @bennyjohnson But this is literally a lie. You are saying that only one side will actually believe this obvious lie (the document in the image literally says it’s from 2019). You are correct, only MAGA cult Epstein defenders believe this shit.

@bennyjohnson But we all know only one side of the political divide will comprehend and believe this don't we? Democrats have nothing other than lies and deceit.

@Thevictoria76 @bennyjohnson @Xbannedado79645 It’s a claim he made in 2019, not anything he actually did in 2006.

@bennyjohnson @Xbannedado79645 That’s not complicity — that’s someone sounding the alarm early.

@jatony57 @bennyjohnson Like fucking hell they have.

@bennyjohnson Democrats sure have been quiet about Epstein lately.

@ued_in @bennyjohnson @ss I’m sure you’re just some dumb bot like most of the replies here, but it’s still baffling just how dumb these posts can be. He obviously has a lot to hide in these files, which is why his name is redacted in so many as we learned today, and why they haven’t released the rest.

@bennyjohnson Trump should be charged with Entrapping the whole Democrat Party The MSM Double standard Influencers And the TDS mob of mongrels into thinking he had something to hide in the Epstein Files I mean he literally just F*cked them up the @ss

@tabitha_sense @Bpahuljica @bennyjohnson You understand that this post is literally a lie and that the document is from 2019, not 2006, right?

@Bpahuljica @bennyjohnson His haters won’t care…they are invested in his guilt and want it so bad as TDS sets in…

@Bpahuljica @bennyjohnson The document does no such thing. It’s a transcript of something Trump said in 2019.

This document clears up so much misinformation. Trump spotted the red flags with Epstein early on and actually took action by alerting authorities—unlike others who stayed silent or enabled it. Maxwell as his "operative" says it all. Finally, some real accountability emerging from these unsealed files. 🇺🇸

@rowdyamerican69 @bennyjohnson He didn’t, though, and Benny is just lying. Look at the document, it’s something Trump said in 2019. There’s nothing here from 2006. It’s just BS like everything he posts.

@bennyjohnson If this is accurate, it’s the opposite of a cover-up. Calling cops on Epstein and flagging Maxwell as an “operative” in 2006 is what cooperation looks like. Now show the full docs, timeline, and who kept giving Epstein sweetheart deals after that.

@realmatejdrev @erikbryn @victoralazarte It’s not an error, you’re just believing a liar.

@erikbryn @victoralazarte The question for me is -- how could the reviewers have been so lazy as to miss the error?

@erikbryn @victoralazarte No, the paper is fine and has no such error. This post is just social media slop BS that misrepresents the paper and makes up nonsense “corrections”.

@victoralazarte That paper should not have been published, let alone in Science. I noticed the error as soon as I read it. Do you have a reference to a more complete summary of Claude's work, other than your tweet?

@baldeaglemeat @victoralazarte Nailed it.

@victoralazarte sure sounds a heck of a lot like you asked AI to generate you a new paper because you didn't like the conclusion of the original work, then decided to trust it because it gave you an answer you preferred