BA Rehl 🌐

16.4K posts

BA Rehl 🌐

BA Rehl 🌐

@Brehmel

Indiana Katılım Mart 2009
8 Takip Edilen286 Takipçiler
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
Tesla doesn't even have a project for unsupervised FSD, so it's not going to be available anytime soon. This article does mention some of the ways Tesla's safety data is cherry picked to make it look better. 🤔 electrek.co/2026/05/18/mus…
English
0
0
1
44
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
How stupid is Elon? 🤔 When Ford F-150 Lightning sales dropped to 27,000 units per year, Ford ended production. The CyberTruck is down to half that rate, but is still being produced -- at a loss on each and every unit. Little Elon doesn't want to admit he failed.
English
0
0
5
139
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
Joey accidentally admits that the Semi is still in pre-production, not high volume production as Musk claimed. 370 units is indeed a massive order when you can only build two trucks per day. 🤔 teslarati.com/tesla-massive-…
English
0
1
0
40
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
This isn't an actual paradox. Boltzmann brains were debunked 8 years ago. 🤔 Are your memories real? Physicists revisit the Boltzmann brain paradox share.google/QbFrp1IWO9Mgiy…
English
0
0
0
30
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
@C_S_Skeptic * They claim the nighttime testing shows expanded capability. It's to reduce interaction with traffic. * They claim the cars are operating unsupervised. They're still using monitors. * They claim they're putting an Optimus in the Boston Marathon. They don't have the range.
English
0
0
0
18
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
@C_S_Skeptic Let's give some examples. * They claim they'll build 50k semis/yr. The entire US market is only 30k semis/yr. * They claim CyberCab is in mass production now. However, pre-production testing for CyberCab depends on an FSD upgrade that requires HW4+ which is due in 2027.
English
1
0
1
32
CommonSenseSkeptic
CommonSenseSkeptic@C_S_Skeptic·
Pay close attention to what is being said here.
George Noble@gnoble79

Tesla is the most successful CON in the history of capital markets. Not because the cars are bad. But because the entire business is engineered to impress on first glance and collapse under scrutiny. And the culture around it has made facts completely IRRELEVANT. I've never seen a company where the gap between what is promised and what is delivered is this wide, for this long, with this little accountability. Tesla's Full Self-Driving system is marketed as autonomy. But it is not autonomy. It is a camera-only system running probabilistic inference. The car is making statistical guesses about what it sees, thousands of times per second, with no redundancy when those guesses are wrong. Probabilistic inference controlling a two-ton vehicle at highway speed with your family inside. NHTSA has two open investigations covering 3.2 million Tesla vehicles. One was escalated to a formal Engineering Analysis in March after 9 crashes, including a fatality, where the system FAILED to detect sun glare, fog, and dust. The cameras went blind and the car kept driving. In Austin, Tesla's robotaxi fleet has reported 15 crashes across roughly 800,000 miles. One crash every 57,000 miles. The average American driver has a police-reported crash every 500,000 miles. Tesla's robotaxis crash at roughly 4x the human rate, WITH a safety monitor sitting in the car whose only job is to prevent crashes. Waymo operates over 2,500 fully driverless vehicles across multiple cities with no human backup and maintains a crash rate 85% below human drivers across 127 million autonomous miles. Tesla has ONE unsupervised vehicle in a tiny section of Austin. But here's what really makes Tesla different from every overvalued company I've ever analyzed: The facts do not matter to the people who own this stock. Every missed deadline, every broken promise gets filtered through the same response: attack the messenger. Call them a short seller. Call them a hater. Anything to avoid looking at the actual numbers. It's an online ecosystem that has made itself completely immune to facts. And Musk baked that dynamic into the culture from the beginning. Every time the fundamentals deteriorate, the faithful don't sell. They double down. When your shareholder base treats every dip as a buying opportunity regardless of the data, the stock becomes untethered from reality entirely. That's literally a religion with a ticker symbol. I highly suggest you read Edward Niedermeyer's book Ludicrous on this. And now it even gets WORSE... CapeFearAdvisors published a piece this week that should be required reading. Tesla's 2025 CEO Performance Award contains a change-of-control provision: In the event of a change of control, ALL operational milestones are disregarded. No million robotaxis, Optimus robots, or $400 billion EBITDA. NONE of it. So if SpaceX acquires Tesla at $8.5 trillion, every tranche of Musk's 423 million share award vests immediately. A single acquisition at that price triggers the full vesting of both plans at once, with no way to claw them back. The milestones everyone argues about are just a distraction. The mechanism is the change-of-control language buried in the SEC filing. This is about engineering the largest personal wealth transfer in modern financial history and using the narrative machine to keep the price elevated long enough to execute it. I've seen every bust of the last four decades. But this one is different because the cult of personality is stronger than anything I've witnessed. The movement around this stock cannot be touched by facts, and that is what makes it so dangerous. But the math always wins. ALWAYS. It just takes longer when the con is this good.

English
9
20
87
4K
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
@Rec1pr0city @thunderf00t Starship will never be operational. Starlink will get devoured by fiber optic and 5G. SpaceX does still have launch services with Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, but competition is growing. Changes in project direction would help but that isn't going to happen with Elon in charge.
English
0
0
0
33
Alter Machete
Alter Machete@Rec1pr0city·
Spacex comes with owning space. Because it's the cost advantages from starship, tesla will own space even more than it does now. The TAM for starlink is billions of devices already and that's before you add a Terawatt of inference compute right about when agi is achieved. Enjoy your poop. Moron.
English
4
1
13
569
thunderf00t
thunderf00t@thunderf00t·
which is better, Buy all spacex for $1 Buy a bag of dog poop for $1 milllion spoiler, spacex comes with 20bn of debt and loses 5bn a year.
thunderf00t tweet media
English
37
13
107
14.7K
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
Yes, historically, the SpaceX IPO structure would be a very bad idea, but I imagine there is some financial desperation involved. 🤔 A Historical Triple Whammy Awaits the SpaceX IPO fool.com/investing/2026…
English
0
0
0
41
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
No, definitely not. The demonstrated payload is only 35k lbs. V3 might hit 75k lbs. Well under 50 tonnes. 🤔 "Flight 12 will be the first flight of V3 hardware. Payload capacity is expected to climb from roughly 35 metric tons to over 100 tonnes" share.google/bfKFybFln2ZjKg…
English
0
1
0
42
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
@kmh Yeah, those are things that will never happen. Starship won't even make it to the Moon, much less Mars. Optimus is just a toy. There are currently no projects at Tesla for actual production of CyberCab or Optimus and no project to develop unsupervised FSD.
English
0
0
0
22
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
SpaceX fans get bitch slapped. * Not Starship * No crew * Not soon 🤔 "The contract, awarded 04/16/26, tasks SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy with launching the ESA's Rosalind Franklin rover from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, no earlier than late 2028." share.google/ah3v27IOgessTg…
English
1
0
3
95
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
This should indicate to Russia that they've already lost. 🤔 A Cat and Dog Made It Out of Ukraine's Deadliest Zone Like This youtu.be/2wlOhlxqP6Q?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
1
59
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
@C_S_Skeptic Well, let's see: * Semi -- wasted money * CyberTruck -- wasted money * Optimus -- wasted money * CyberCab -- wasted money * Dojo -- wasted money * FSD -- wasted money * Factory in Texas -- wasted money * Musk bonuses -- wasted money Yeah, pretty much 🤔
English
0
0
1
28
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
@Earth_Vis @thunderf00t You're talking about the fantasy design (the one Musk pulled out of his ass) -- I'm talking about the actual design (the one on the drawing board at SpaceX). Starship, as designed, will never lift 100 tons regardless of modifications to the Raptor engines.
English
2
0
0
28
thunderf00t
thunderf00t@thunderf00t·
fascinating...... 11 flights of starship fail to make it to orbit.... musk fans 'its just a test program' new glen reuses booster, gets to orbit on flight 3, but the wrong one. musk fans 'what a failure'
English
48
18
178
16.7K
Sionnach Bán
Sionnach Bán@an_sionnach_ban·
@thunderf00t Starship has never attempted orbit so it hasn’t “failed” to make orbit 11 times.
English
2
0
9
184
BA Rehl 🌐
BA Rehl 🌐@Brehmel·
@Earth_Vis @thunderf00t Except Starship isn't. It's actual design payload mass is about 75 tons and at this point I doubt they can reach even that. I'm wondering if Starship will ever out-lift Falcon Heavy. 🤔
English
1
0
0
29
Earth Vis
Earth Vis@Earth_Vis·
Not a single rocket on earth has designed from day one as 100% reusable, mass production rocket, 150 -200 ton of payload. Only Starship. This is a new territory, and is incredibly hard to solve. So spare us with 11 test flight fails to make it to orbit. They have already tested launching Starlink (Empty Model) payload to orbit in previous test flight. New Glenn wasn't 100% reusable, only partially reusable like Falcon 9. And Falcon 9 just accomplished 600 landings. Starship and New Glenn aren't even in the same category. Bravo to New Glenn attempting it, but SpaceX has far greater experience in experimenting rocket. They are not eager to prove themselves to get contract, as they have been proven many times, so they can take as much time they want to test Starship. Meanwhile Blue Origin is eager to get contract to prove themselves. Both are not in the same situation.
English
1
0
2
131