Corbz

@Ewok_Guy @IfightAutists @Rothmus What is your point? Civilians under our rule were slaughtered therefore it's just to murder civilians under their rule? Guilt by association is a fallacy. This is an evil position to hold. Justifying murder by a fallacy.

@BronzeFace @IfightAutists @Rothmus Btw Germans and especially The SS carried out genocides against civilians in the USSR

@silgikore @IfightAutists @Rothmus Who are you to say this for every last civilian slaughtered? Necessarily your assertion REQUIRES a 100% approval from every last civilian for that to be true. Also what of the Poles and their slaughter by soviets, were they "collectively" guilty for any crimes deserving murder?

@HaamerPoiss @IfightAutists @Rothmus No it's not, Hitler and Putin alike are responsible for allocating resources towards murder. They are at the top of their respective hierarchies. Civilians hold no such roles, this is a false equivalence.

@BronzeFace @IfightAutists @Rothmus This is the same retarded cope the russians use right now. It wasn’t Hitler who killed 6 million jews and neither is it Putin who raped 500 people at Bucha

@brew56200 @BeastAntares @AgoristN Credentialism isn't a valid substitute for facts and reason. If you can't demonstrate why, and have to rely on authority appeals and unreasoned assertions then you ought not be taken seriously. "I have credential x" doesn't make unreasoned assertions true, it's midwit delusion.

@BeastAntares @BronzeFace @AgoristN Because I know history, I have a baccalaureate degree in the field, and it shows.

@sallyrider22 @AgoristN Is extortion mutually exclusive to theft? How so?

@AgoristN Taxes aren't theft. Taxes are extortion.

@brew56200 @BeastAntares @AgoristN Why presuppose that? You can't just open up with "bad stuff will happen without x" without reasoning why. You must explain the incentives first. Why assume the law of the jungle, why not natural law? You must explain, not just presume.

@BeastAntares @AgoristN You want the point of a gun to be the only law that matters?

@Patriot55806870 @AgoristN And what of those who didn't ask, don't care, don't want their money to be stolen to fund... literally anything? You don't get to claim "look what I've done for you" when your expenses came involuntarily from that person's pocket.

@AgoristN Ah, another free rider who think he is entitled and can benefit of other people's work without paying for that. If you are not defending the borders of your country now or not paying someone to do that you are a parasite.

@lawen4cer Your narrative contradicts reality.

Verarscht die AfD eigentlich ihre Wähler oder bestimmte Mitglieder?

@ze19405_3 @th3reddot @RedPill_Marxism Communist defences summarised lmao.

"Gun to your head, name one thing Stalin did wrong"

@fiat_money You see a smaller number and your chimp brain gets a pulse of excitement, ignorant to the context. No, the smaller blue line doesn't mean "this is efficient" or even close. You're comparing a state monopoly to red tape bureaucracy. Both systems are bad and inefficient.

@BronzeFace Yup, super wasteful. Data goes brrrr

It’s because of the billionaire class. You still haven’t learned.

@Darknesshas123 @DelusionPosting I know, that's why rent controls hurt the poor more of anyone. You need market competition to drive prices to their free market average. Destroy the profit incentives with rent controls, and they all get sold to upper middle class instead, those why CAN afford.

@BronzeFace @DelusionPosting The average person living in new york city cannot afford a house in new york city, and they can barely afford to rent.

@fiat_money No, also don't make the fallacy of "smaller number = efficient" the state monopoly systems are woefully wasteful, visible in spending versus waiting lines. You are comparing a state monopoly to state interference, not free market healthcare. Turns out that red tape is costly!

@BronzeFace I am comparing a less regulated more market based system to a public one. You are coping because you don’t like data

@fiat_money You don't know what you're comparing. Bureaucracy, heavy regulation, disturbingly overreaching legal authority and cronyism isn't a criticism of market healthcare, you're comparing two different types of state interference. You're making a fallacy.

@BronzeFace Where is the central planning?

@fiat_money @keremey57 @CasuallyGreg @ninaturner This falls flat when you look at the absurd costs caused by central planning. Also ignoring subjective value, I don't value a road hundreds of miles away that I involuntarily paid for. Also just throwing out consent. We need it for sex, but not reallocating stealing trillions😶

@keremey57 @CasuallyGreg @ninaturner Math too hard? Gov has a deficit

@Omino21 @_Hazardous_Wolf Because as Mises demonstrated; a capitalist knows that he is efficiently allocating his resources when his profits increase, and misallocating when they go down. These signals are derived from the market, of everyone else doing the same thing. It's constantly changing to demand.

@BronzeFace @_Hazardous_Wolf How's profit a necessary input on this? The necessity is to manage production, in which operational research helps. Similarly it's not impossible to know demand by current tech in a timely manner. The allocation might not perfect but it's entirely workable.

There have been many great minds who have, but the fact that socialism has never been able to solve the ECP, both in theory and practice, debunk Marx and his stupid ideas in of itself.

Bastiat’s debunks Marx by showing that he focuses on the visible (worker hardship and capitalist profit) while ignoring the unseen: capital investment, risk, entrepreneurship, coordination, opportunity cost, and long-term systemic effects. Profit isn’t automatically theft; it can be payment for real economic contribution.

@Bladeeaura @NappysTheBomb @dorianyateism @HeyUWithTheFace @ShitpostGate Propose I want two things: 1. the complete abolition of the state and its apparatus 2. to freely trade goods and services with my fellow man, without violating the non aggression principle What then, does that define a far left wing person to you?

@NappysTheBomb @dorianyateism @HeyUWithTheFace @ShitpostGate its far left

@CommieInaBox @_Hazardous_Wolf I don't see the relevance of this... Do you know what the ECP is? We don't appreciate taxes around here, for any purpose.

@_Hazardous_Wolf If our taxes were used to provide food and housing to Americans instead of conduct and fund war and genocide, our entire economy would collapse. Every minimum wage worker in the country would quit their job over night if their literal life wasnt being threatened.

@Omino21 @_Hazardous_Wolf Every time with the "tech will handle it" argument. Dude, you're fundamentally missing a required input variable. You can have all of the processing power to ever exist, but you can't solve the ecp without the input variables: profit. It's missing the point to an absurd degree.

@_Hazardous_Wolf Honestly I don't see how the ECP is necessarily "debunking". That's true that command economies in the 40s weren't able to effectivly answer it, but modern tech made such issues much easier to gain and manage information necessary for production.