Sabitlenmiş Tweet
BrunoLM
2.8K posts

BrunoLM
@BrunoLM7
Developer - JavaScript/TypeScript - https://t.co/bDXXEUvmGB
Brazil Katılım Mayıs 2009
229 Takip Edilen251 Takipçiler

The "GitHub Copilot App" is all a developer needs.
I think it's set to be revolutionary, making everything from building applications with Copilot to maintaining them possible within a single app.
#github #githubcopilot #copilot

English

Short answer: no. Windows Terminal splits panes for the human, but it has no capture-pane equivalent — wt.exe handles layout (new-tab, split-pane, focus-tab), not content. There's no public API to read another pane's scrollback; Microsoft has an open feature ask for an iTerm2-style API, nothing shipped.
What actually works on Windows for the same agent-watches-agent pattern:
1. tmux in WSL — same workflow, zero changes. `tmux capture-pane -pt session:pane -S -200` is what the screenshot is doing. If the rest of your stack already lives in WSL, this is the path of least resistance.
2. psmux — native Windows tmux clone in Rust, built on ConPTY. Speaks the tmux command language including capture-pane. No WSL, no Cygwin. Worth a look if you want the workflow without leaving native PowerShell.
3. Skip the pane scraping entirely — if the inner side is Claude Code, run it non-interactively (`claude -p "..."`) and capture stdout directly. No multiplexer needed; just two processes and a pipe. Same idea for codex exec.
4. Log-and-tail — `Start-Transcript` or `Tee-Object` one side to a file, `Get-Content -Wait` from the other. Falls apart fast with TUIs because ANSI/cursor sequences end up in the log, but fine for plain stdout.
WT's value prop is the chrome (themes, profiles, settings UI), not multiplexer plumbing. For "one agent reads another's terminal" in a single shell, the real choice is tmux (WSL) or psmux (native).
English

Short answer: no.
Copilot Pro+ ($39/mo):
- Opus 4.7 available (Pro+/Business/Enterprise), but context capped at 200K — not 1M like Claude Code
- Reasoning locked to medium; no high/xhigh toggle
- Opus 4.7 = 7.5x premium-request multiplier; 1,500/mo pool → ~200 Opus calls before overage
- Weekly token caps on top
- Moving to usage-based billing June 1, 2026
- Opus removed from plain Pro; 4.5/4.6 being removed from Pro+
Claude direct:
- Pro $17/mo annual ($20 monthly), Claude Code included (mostly Sonnet)
- Max from $100/mo with 5x or 20x Pro usage, full Opus 4.7 + 1M + adjustable effort
- 5h session limits + weekly caps
So for Opus 4.7 xhigh @ 1M, Copilot is not parity — same model name, stripped context and effort. Pricing: Pro+ sits between Claude Pro and Max, but the 7.5x burn rate eats the pool fast. The MS engineers losing CC lose the high-context tier, not just the brand.
English

scoop: Microsoft is starting to cancel Claude Code licenses. Engineers in Microsoft's Experiences + Devices team will have to transition to GitHub Copilot CLI by the end of June. Details in my Notepad 📒 issue, live now for subscribers 👇 theverge.com/tech/930447/mi…
English

@JinjingLiang You should consider signing your builds, free option you should be eligible for I believe: signpath.org
English

Want to ditch Claude?
Someone just released the any-agent version of 'Claude Agent View'
Use Codex, Pi, Droid, whatever.
github.com/stablyai/orca
And yes, that someone was me
Claude@claudeai
New in Claude Code: agent view. One list of all your sessions, available today as a research preview.
English

@mcpark @verge @grok 1)MS cuts Claude Code licenses
2)Devs pushed to Copilot CLI
3)E+D off by June 30
4)FY-end cost trim
5)CC too popular, hurt Copilot
6)Devs preferred CC
7)Anthropic stays via Copilot CLI
8)Foundry deal safe
9)Eyed Cursor buy
10)Onus on GitHub
Internal call, not Anthropic drama.
English

Microsoft starts canceling Claude Code licenses theverge.com/tech/930447/mi…
English

I signed both. I think Codex is inferior in every category.
Specially the CLI, they're refusing to make it usable on Windows. github.com/openai/codex/i…
Also, whoever does any of their tools should be replaced, maybe they should use Claude to build their TUI and extension github.com/openai/codex/i…
English
BrunoLM retweetledi

According to @tryramp, @AnthropicAI just overtook OpenAI in business customers (34.4% vs 32.3% this week). In the Text Arena, that flip happened in Q4 2025. Real-world signal led enterprise adoption by ~6 months.
But the picture shifts fast: Codex crossed 3M+ weekly developers in April, up 5x since January (per @OpenAI).
Coding agents are their own contest. More from Arena shortly.
English

@anime_shots You might need to be a bit tech savvy, but this could help
hibikicodex.com
English

What this means concretely:
The prompt "Read this support.claude.com/en/articles/15… and do some websearch to find what people are saying about it, then explain in detail"
Can do:
Pro $20 credit: ~46 identical runs
Max 5x $100 credit: ~230 identical runs
Max 20x $200 credit: ~461 identical runs
If the prompts are simpler maybe you can get x4 that. If they're more complex and less cached, then good luck.
English















