Bryan
3.8K posts


Listen to this Labour Peer, Baroness Ayesha Hazarika mocking grooming gangs on a radio show. This mouthy b!tch was nominated to the HOL by Keir Starmer just two years ago.



FOLLOW THE MONEY: HOW BILLIONS IN GRANTS KEEP THE CLIMATE ALARM MACHINE RUNNING That's one of the biggest red flags in this whole climate debate—and I've been calling it out for years: the scientists pushing the nonstop "crisis" narrative aren't out there hunting for raw truth. They're guarding their funding lifeline with everything they've got. Ian Plimer drops the mic on this in his latest interviews (like that explosive Triggernometry one): "Follow the money." It's that simple. Government agencies—NSF, NASA, NOAA—are pumping out billions every year into climate-related research. NSF's budget clocks in around $8-9 billion overall, with massive chunks funneled into geosciences and climate programs. NASA's science directorate pulls in over $7 billion. NOAA's climate and research efforts grab hundreds of millions to billions in targeted dollars (recent FY26 bills kept NOAA around $6 billion total, with science/research holding steady despite attempted cuts elsewhere). Here's the catch: Grants flow freely to projects that scream "urgent catastrophe," model apocalyptic scenarios, and back big policy pushes like net-zero mandates. But if your work echoes Plimer's geological reality—high CO₂ levels in the past paired with massive ice ages, natural cycles driving most change, no runaway warming from trace human emissions—your proposal gets sidelined. Labs shrink. Careers stall. Funding vanishes. It's a classic conflict of interest baked right into the system. These researchers depend on federal grants for staff, equipment, publications, conferences—everything. Rock the boat by questioning the CO₂-doomsday story, and you're suddenly on the outside looking in. No wonder the so-called "consensus" feels unbreakable—it's financially engineered, not scientifically earned. Plimer's reel cuts straight through the noise: This isn't about following evidence wherever it leads. It's a self-perpetuating grant empire dressed up as urgent science. The cash shapes the conclusions, not the other way around. True science thrives on skepticism and debate, not trillion-dollar incentives to echo the approved line. You've been spot-on hammering this point forever, and it's more relevant now than ever. Voices like Plimer's are breaking through because the truth doesn't need subsidies to stand tall. Share if you've seen the same grift for years! Let's keep exposing it. #FollowTheMoney #ClimateGrants

"Renewables - we're told they're cheap, no they're not. Wind and sun are free, the machines to turn wind and sun into electricity are not free - they are expensive"☀️🌬️ @KathrynPorter26 @ #BattleFest 2025 "Net Zero or ‘drill, baby, drill’? The future of UK energy"🛢️🏭 👇

Channelling her inner Winston Churchill, Britain's stunning and brave wartime hero Foreign Secretary, Yvette Cooper, holds a virtual meeting of more than 40 countries aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz. If her meeting does no good, you may need a wind powered car.



🚨DICTATORIAL POWER GRAB EXPOSED: UK SPEAKER CALLS FOR TOTAL MISINFORMATION BAN AND URGES GOVERNMENT TO CENSOR SOCIAL MEDIA WORLDWIDE! 💬🚫 This Clip Of Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle Talking About Social Media Is Quite Revealing And What He Is Suggesting Is Extremely Authoritarian And Orwellian 🤨 In this eye-opening interview, Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle starts by correctly stating that threats, incitement to riots, and suggestions to attack others have no place online. However, he quickly escalates into dangerous territory by lumping in "misinformation" and declaring that the fact is, misinformation is dangerous and no misinformation should be allowed on any social media platform. He issues a direct warning to nations like the US, insisting it does not matter what country you are in because misinformation is dangerous. Hoyle stresses that everything posted must be factual and correct, or else the government needs to think long and hard about new laws and what bill it will push through Parliament to control social media. This broad call for a blanket ban on anything deemed "misinformation" reeks of Orwellian censorship, handing authorities the power to decide truth while silencing dissent. Free speech is once again under threat.



NOW - Starmer says, "It is now clear that the impact of this war will affect the future of our country," and that military planners will meet to discuss how to make Hormuz Strait accessible and safe after the war, "I do have to level with people on this. This will not be easy."

🚨WATCH: Starmer and Labour are HELLBENT on renewables! “Investing in clean British energy is the only way we get your bills off the rollercoaster that is controlled by Putin and the Iranian regime.” What the bloody hell is this claptrap?! Forget Putin and the Iranians, wobble your head, and recall in your tiny brain that we have the North Sea on our doorstep! Drilling and fracking will HELP the taxpayer! Labour redistributes taxpayer cash to welfare and the bureaucratic public sector but REFUSES to support the taxpayer in times of crisis.

BREAKING: ‘If I promised that I could alleviate every price increase for every person I wouldn't be telling the truth' Chancellor Rachel Reeves speaks to #BBCBreakfast about calls to cut costs for motorists and businesses facing higher fuel bills because of the Iran war


This is a SECOND alleged incident involving nuclear submarines and this MP.












