Christopher Lincoln

70 posts

Christopher Lincoln

Christopher Lincoln

@BullMountain406

Billings, MT Katılım Aralık 2022
41 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@ForgiatoBlow47 I think Trump is putting final nail in the coffin of his presidency. He will go down as worst president if all time. Trump's the one who's got stuck in the swamp
English
0
0
0
2
Trumps Nephew
Trumps Nephew@ForgiatoBlow47·
Do you think Lauren Boebert ended her political career by supporting Thomas Massie?
Trumps Nephew tweet media
English
2K
465
4.6K
53.2K
Aly Dee
Aly Dee@realfemsapien·
Who has been more of a net positive on American Christian culture as of late?
Aly Dee tweet mediaAly Dee tweet media
English
56
0
91
11.7K
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@farmingandJesus Actually he is correct but overstating a fact. Obviously women can think, they just can't think correctly in this arena. God's order also comes with design characteristics. Didn't believe he's correct go look at works voting records and you'll find out🤷
English
0
0
0
46
🌷 LIZZIE🌷
🌷 LIZZIE🌷@farmingandJesus·
This is just a stupid thing to say. Women shouldn’t lead because God said men lead and they are the stronger vessel , but to say we can’t think? Women can’t lead because it’s out of Godly order… Why do you hate Gods creation so much? Grow up dude for reals.
🌷 LIZZIE🌷 tweet media
English
170
27
865
25.3K
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@HwsEleutheroi Remember when dr. White would call sola scriptura and and claim Catholics use Scripture + tradition. His new hermeneutic seems to be Scripture + boomer propaganda.
English
0
0
2
48
𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡
ROFL. There is nothing so absurd Joel Webbon and his crew will not defend, including the idiotic statement that women can't think. I truly feel for any women caught up in this Christ-less nationalism movement. It is truly abusive in its politically derived, unbiblical "patriarchy." And Joel, these days, you wouldn't know how to define the word "humbly" if your life depended on it.
Joel Webbon@JoelWebbon

@HwsEleutheroi Righteous women don’t walk up to men and physically attack them. I humbly encourage you to repent of your internalized feminism.

English
88
25
534
44.1K
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@HwsEleutheroi Everybody must remember dr. White wife has worked outside the home for his entire career. Him being a feminist is nothing new. He's been a big disappointment these last few years seeing that he just can't think past the propaganda his generation was fed.
English
1
0
0
201
𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡
Someone really needs to take Dale's phone away before a righteous woman walks up to him and knocks him silly. One thing is for sure, I know a LOT of women who think FAR more clearly than this "which way is the wind blowing today" wannabe.
Dale Partridge@dalepartridge

@sgruber91 Women cannot lead because most women cannot think.

English
121
35
863
68.9K
annie
annie@ohhanxiety·
🤔
annie tweet media
QME
3.9K
104
369
65.3K
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@GodlyNations If he left the trump VP spot right now there might be a chance to save his chance at the presidency. If he stays in the most pro Israel administration he's toast and nobody will remember his name
English
1
0
0
37
Godly Nation
Godly Nation@GodlyNations·
What are the chances you'd vote for JD Vance for President in 2028? A. 100% B. 50% C. 25% D. 0%
Godly Nation tweet media
English
479
39
304
11.1K
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@sdotcoburnicus @dalepartridge And that's based on literally nothing. Your just using talking points. But biblically and historically you have no argument. Miss me with your weak comments.
English
2
0
0
27
S. Coburnicus
S. Coburnicus@sdotcoburnicus·
It’s funny you call dudes that don’t like this oppressive crap effeminate, when the reality is, it’s really weak beta men that lack the natural masculinity to have proper dynamics with their partners that need to have their relationship codified into doctrine for their authority. So you really look like a dumb shit you are. His primary demographic are incels like you
English
1
0
5
38
Dale Partridge
Dale Partridge@dalepartridge·
No man wants a woman who cusses. Swear words, obscenities, profanity, and vulgarity are not feminine or godly. Foul language is foul. But from women, who are to be the “fairer sex” and the “gentle and quiet spirits,” it’s abhorrent. Stop it.
English
278
78
908
27.7K
JD Vance
JD Vance@JDVance·
Fraudsters have been fleecing Americans for too long. That ends now.
English
5.2K
3.7K
26.1K
676.6K
Mary
Mary@Mary1417796·
IS MICHELLE OBAMA THE MOST BEAUTIFUL FIRST LADY THE US HAS EVER HAD? A. Yes 👍 B. No 👎
Mary tweet media
English
16.5K
303
1.8K
246.4K
JD Vance
JD Vance@JDVance·
Under President Trump, we are unleashing the most aggressive federal anti-fraud efforts in American history. We won't rest until we root out every bit of fraud infecting our government and screwing over taxpayers. More coming tomorrow. Stay tuned.
English
10.9K
11.6K
66.7K
2.9M
JOSH DUNLAP
JOSH DUNLAP@JDunlap1974·
How much do you still trust this team?
JOSH DUNLAP tweet media
English
15.7K
1.8K
12.4K
475.5K
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@realDonaldTrump Your a joke. This is not what we elected you for . You've been a disgrace since the first time netanyahu met with you. There's no saving this country folks. Buy some ammo with the money your saving by not paying taxes.
English
0
0
1
7
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@EvangelicalDW Who cares James and Doug can't figure out Everytime they open their mouth they push more people to out side. Let them speak, it's just self sacrifice for them
English
0
0
0
0
Evangelical Dark Web
Evangelical Dark Web@EvangelicalDW·
Tagging me behind a block. James White is an effeminate coward.
Evangelical Dark Web tweet media
English
30
15
343
9.3K
Red Line Report 🇺🇸
Red Line Report 🇺🇸@RedLineReportt·
79 years old and still the hardest working President we have ever had. Simple poll. Please be honest! As of today, how much do you still trust this man? A. 100% B. 75% C. 50% D. 25% E. 0% Everyone better answer this one correctly☝️!!
Red Line Report 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
13.9K
1.3K
8.1K
215.6K
Christopher Lincoln
Christopher Lincoln@BullMountain406·
@Eric_Conn @joe_rigney He's lost probably 50-80% of his online following. Toby and Gabe hardly get responses and he still doesn't see that he's being the problem. Not that we should judge ourselves by the praise of men. But considering who his followers where, I think that would be enough to make see
English
0
0
0
124
Eric Conn
Eric Conn@Eric_Conn·
The timing on this one is interesting. For those who missed it, Doug has been getting shelled from all over the place, not just the little Reformed ghetto, for comments he made at AmFest—including his ad absurdum about the attack of the USS Liberty, and his support of the Talmud ("Two Cheers for the Talmud!"). I appreciate your loyalty, Joe. I really do. And I think it's an incredibly savvy post—rather than addressing any of Doug's controversial or pro-Talmud claims ("There's gold in them there hills!"), you redirected the conversation to attempt to divide the (very diverse) group of folks who've expressed criticism of Doug's arguments. I'm actually quite impressed. Instead you rehashed your distorted version of a history that few will take the time to sort through (I don't blame them). You're banking on them trusting your reputation and moving on. The obvious aim in this was to yet again portray Moscow as the innocent victim, when Doug was quite obviously the instigator and aggressor. In truth, we all met last year in Moscow, disagreed with a ton, and we refused to denounce the whole WBS thing. We also were fine maintaining unity across such a disagreement. Doug was not—he penned a papal screed against us that was both untrue and divisive, even in your own churches. We didn't drop the bomb; Doug did. He is the one that forced the unnecessary division. Revoice for Nazis, bromance with cancer and all that. The obvious problem: For all your talk of weaponized empathy, and being steered, you refuse to acknowledge the ways in which your camp has been steered by the Jews and/or access to larger platforms. Whose hand is on the steering wheel when you'll disavow Christian brothers but join hands with Talmudic Judaism? This isn't an allegation; it is a matter of public record and Doug's own comments. And of course you maintain the tired line that Doug has basically never done anything wrong, ever. I make no predictions about Moscow. There are amazing people there. Many brothers in Christ. We pray for the work regularly. We are deeply grateful for Doug's past work. And yet still I think Doug should repent for his divisive behavior.
English
18
37
558
18.4K
Joe Rigney
Joe Rigney@joe_rigney·
So it’s been a little over a year since the failed attempt between the leaders in Moscow and Ogden to come to one mind. I’ve largely avoided any public commentary on it, partly because I don’t think about it a lot and I have more pressing responsibilities, and partly because it had seemed best to let sleeping dogs lie (everyone had been largely minding their own business and moving on). But since there has recently been a number of festive dust-ups during this festive season, and since I periodically get tagged and asked what I think, I thought it might be helpful to put out there how I frame the whole thing (with apologies for the length): During the meeting here in Moscow a year ago, there were two noteworthy points of agreement (among other things). One was that Stone Choir was bad news, and the other was that the attempt to slip Nazi iconography into normie Christian stuff was no bueno (the example of the second that we discussed was Samuel Holden’s White Boy Summer video that included the Nazi imagery). Our contention was that slipping the Nazi stuff into a pastiche of images of John Wayne, John Macarthur, Teddy Roosevelt, and Steve Irwin was an attempt to co-opt the WBS meme in destructive ways, and the Ogden guys pointed to Brian’s clarification after the video that they were unaware of the Nazi junk when they originally commended it. All of this was to the good, and why there was optimism after the meeting. So if there was some agreement about the problem, where was the rub? Partly over the seriousness over the issue (how widespread, how grave), and partly over how to address it (denunciations, declarations, statements, etc). For my part, I noted that denunciations often backfire and simply give the transgressive edgelords the attention they want. Instead, I commended a strategy I’d seen Doug use a number of times over the years, most notably after the publication of Black and Tan. After that book came out, a number of kinists attempted to find safe harbor in Moscow circles, thinking that someone who partially defended the South on constitutional grounds (as Doug did) would be sympathetic to white identitarianism (which Doug isn’t). So after a number of dustups with the kinists online, Doug published Skin and Blood, partly as a way to clear out that particular error. In the meeting, I described the strategy as “Don’t denounce them; disappoint them.” In other words, if you have some gnarly elements latching on to your community or movement, you don’t need to directly condemn them by name; instead simply say or do things that will disappoint them. “We thought you were so based and awesome but now we see that you’re just another compromiser, etc.” So my basic exhortation to the gents in Ogden was this: given our shared agreement that Stone Choir and the Nazi imagery used by Samuel Holden are not good, you guys should periodically find a way to disappoint the members of your community who think that you’re on board with that. If you guys think it’s important to talk about Jewish influence on and in the US (and other related matters, all of which we said was perfectly fine), know what kind of folks that might attract (i.e. “Hitler was a Christian Prince," etc) and be prepared to disappoint them. Get the undesirable elements to break with you because you say or do something unpalatable to them. If they’re trying to co-opt your thing or steer you by flattery, then communicate clearly that you can’t be steered or co-opted. And to their credit, they seemed to agree with this approach and had said that they had done so at various times on their podcast. We encouraged them to do so more and more. Now here’s the thing: a week after that meeting, the White Boy Christmas video dropped, the Ogden guys promoted it, and we had the back and forth on the Signal chat, culminating in the Laced with Poo blog post, and the Ogden guys leaving the chat. My basic read on how that went is this: The guys in Ogden took my/our advice. But we were the undesirables that they wanted to disappoint. Posting and defending the video seemed to me was their way of saying, “We won’t be ‘steered' by Moscow” (which, for the record, we weren’t attempting to do). And while I’ll admit that this was somewhat disappointing to me, I’ve basically viewed it as a strategic decision on both sides about how and with whom we want to labor. Ogden is basically saying, “We want to build and fight on our part of the wall, in our way, with guys like the Holdens and the Crusader anons who listen to Stone Choir.” And we’ve said, “We’re going to build on our part of the wall in our way, which means periodically disappointing those who stan for Nazis and laughing at those who like to call Doug a “fat rabbi who makes incomprehensible word salads.” And honestly, while I wish it wasn’t so, I’m actually content with the situation. As I argue in Leadership and Emotional Sabotage, we’ve brought the sublimated conflict into the open and clarified it. And then we’ve all placed our bets on how to build and who to build with, with much of the flare-ups downstream from those decisions (It's all in Girard, man). Some are convinced that Moscow is about to implode or is withering away, that the Spirit has departed, and we've doomed ourselves. I guess we’ll see. In the meantime, there really isn’t any ill will on our end, despite the public insinuations that we're paid by Mossad, that we've sold out to the Jews, or the Longhouse, or the Jewish Longhouse, in order to get platformed. We find those sorts of claims amusing and make jokes about them in staff meetings. And they don't keep us from appreciating some of the good stuff coming out of Ogden. I listen to Ogden podcasts occasionally (but only the good parts). And Doug is currently reading Reviling Wives with benefit. So there you have it. Happy New Year.
English
170
42
709
116.2K