Nifty knuckles

@BSVbosses The foundation has been built. Try, don’t be influenced by competition. Good luck my fellow entrepreneurs.

@BSVbosses If you’re trying to conduct business for profit I may agree but still disagree on few things. We all understand what’s going on here . The value is being able to build a business on the ability to transact for lower cost and security.

Bsv’s failure is 100% on Craig. He showed up promising to Sue and destroy the entire multi-trillion dollar crypto industry. He called everyone in the entire industry scammers and criminals. He made zero allies, only enemies. What can you expect if you operate that way? #bsv

@rajatsoni @JoelDalais @369bsv @CsTominaga Faster and cheaper is ideal in a competitive market.

@JoelDalais @369bsv @CsTominaga The world doesn't care about "faster and cheaper" We already have faster and cheaper If that's what you're competing on, you will always lose over the long term to something that's more centralized

The claim that Bitcoin could reach $1 million per coin and represent 21% of global capitalisation is factually and criminally misleading for several reasons. Firstly, the assumption that Bitcoin could dominate 21% of the global economy is unrealistic and deceptive. Global capital markets are vast and diversified across different sectors, industries, and asset classes, including stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, and other currencies. No single asset, particularly a speculative one like Bitcoin, can dominate such a large share of the world's wealth. Secondly, the intrinsic nature of Bitcoin does not support such an inflated valuation. Bitcoin lacks the productive capacity of other assets that contribute to global GDP, like companies, industries, or commodities. As a speculative digital asset, its value is based on market perception rather than the production of real goods and services. Suggesting that Bitcoin could reach a price point where it consumes such a significant portion of global capital is inherently misleading. This kind of statement preys on the fear of missing out (FOMO) and entices people into a market under false pretenses, making it fraudulent in its intent to misrepresent Bitcoin's potential to capture global value. It could be seen as an attempt to manipulate market sentiment and encourage speculative investments based on an unrealistic and dangerous promise. This could expose the parties making such claims to legal action for fraudulent financial advice.

@cryptotweek1 @cryptorebel_SV logout /satoshi upper right corner seems interesting

@cryptorebel_SV Yep , I guess no one know the significant differences between hosting and domain. You can't re purchase a domain that's already registered and paid for.

It appears that Dr. Wright recorded several videos logging into the Satoshi/Sakura vistomail account as part of #COPA evidence: web.archive.org/web/2024091520… Here is one of the videos, which was released by COPA members on their BSV hate forums: web.archive.org/web/2024091612…

@ferocious_pooh @CsTominaga Very nice.

It’s not a hard truth to accept if you understand the ramifications. A distributed and verifiable timestamp server will allow us to build markets (info, assets, etc.) that are less reliant on middlemen that are able to exploit our inability to verify ground truth on our own. If I have an audit trail of all communications and exchanges I’ve made with a person or company I have the ability to enforce legal agreements I’ve made with them. The truth shall set us free.

There’s a fundamental choice that everyone involved with Bitcoin must eventually confront. Do you continue to cling to the popular narratives that have emerged over the years—believing that Bitcoin was designed with political decentralisation and censorship resistance at its core, and that running a full node is somehow essential to the network's operation? actsOr do you confront the harder, less glamorous truth: that Bitcoin’s true purpose was always much more practical, focused on facilitating micropayments and implementing a distributed timestamp server? This choice is not just about accepting facts but about recognising that much of the mythology surrounding Bitcoin—ideas about total decentralisation and censorship resistance—are later inventions that have no basis in "Satoshi's" original design. The question, then, is whether to live in a comfortable illusion or embrace the reality of what Bitcoin can actually do, and how it functions when stripped of the myths.

@B56451578 @PeterScottMorg1 @Dr_CSWright It will sell out and change its twitter name to BSV5000.

@PeterScottMorg1 @Dr_CSWright Man, I take note of your devotion, lol. But Craig is more likely to win, and I hope you will be decent enough to make a good statement afterwards (sometime later this year, … forever away).

I've been trolling #BSV'ers for so long that I don't know what I'm going to post about when @Dr_CSWright goes to jail. Any ideas? #Bitcoin

@opencryptoorg @axios @BradyDale When are you guys gonna sell out is the real question. Maybe put the gi joes away for bit??

Despite a lineup of potential candidates for Satoshi, Craig Wright didn't even make @Axios’ list. That's because Craig Wright is not Satoshi. @BradyDale axios.com/newsletters/ax…

@ErikVoorhees You’ve got more problems than that coming your way hotshot.

Woah. "The Commission’s Order, however, fails to identify which crypto assets were investment contracts and provides no explanation for its conclusion.   ... In sum, ShapeShift is in trouble because the Commission, nearly ten years after ShapeShift’s platform started trading and more than three years after it changed its business model, now contends that some unidentified number of the 79 crypto assets it traded between 2014 and 2021 were investment contracts without explaining why.  Notably, the Commission does not allege any harm—ShapeShift and its customers voluntarily transacted and the Order nowhere alleges that ShapeShift defrauded its customers. ... The standards are so opaque and arbitrary that the Commission itself is unwilling to stand by its own analysis. ... The environment we have created for the crypto asset markets, especially as it relates to secondary trading, is untenable.... Cases like this do not protect investors; they intimidate innovators and entrepreneurs.  We respectfully dissent." @ShapeShift sec.gov/news/statement…

@DougAMacgregor Don’t confuse people just yet grasshopper. Give it another month or so . Cheers

The only way to control you own destiny in the west is to get bitcoin. No one is enthused about a the bank issuing digital currency.

@kurtwuckertjr @EquityDiamonds @iampaulgrewal correct

Craig was extorted and sued by Ira Kleiman who turned down a settlement offer. Craig was offering settlement to Hodlonaut who, instead of negotiating, sued Craig. Craig had very simple settlement terms for Cøbra who also decided to go to trial and then lost in default. Peter McCormack begged and campaigned to be sued for defamation. COPA has now rejected an offer to settle. I think it’s fascinating that you can so brazenly pretend like Craig is litigious, when he has been the defendant in nearly every case that has gone to trial, and the only reason any are being litigated are because the refusal to behave like adults acting in commercial interest in the blockchain economy. As for Craig’s fight generally against the crypto economy and companies like Coinbase, perhaps if your company wasn’t clearly complicit in things like insider listings and insider trading like the situation with Charlie Lee and Litecoin: a blockchain that had no users until Coinbase pumped it and let Charlie front run dumping his bags onto retail. Or the insider trading situation around the Bitcoin Cash pump and dump that occurred and didn’t allow retail traders to sell their coins until market makers were done “fixing” the alleged issue with the order books. Of course, that’s happened dozens of times. Every time there’s a real opportunity to sell, Coinbase can’t figure out how to keep the lights on for retail traders to take profits. Coinbase is legendary for its terrible customer service and has had to settle to the tune of tens of millions of dollars for failure to abide by money laundering regulations, and of course, there’s also the suit from the SEC for running your shadow-banking bucket shop of illegal security tokens. Coinbase is everything wrong with the blockchain economy, and the fact that you have joined a cabal of Silicon Valley patent trolls in order to punish Craig for having the balls to stand up to the disgusting cesspool that Coinbase represents isn’t only NOT bad. It’s brave, and it’s necessary. Coinbase helped kill the disruptive opportunity of bitcoin by sacrificing it on the altar of fiat profits in a gray market, bucket shop casino designed to encourage degenerates to gamble their savings on stupid memes. Absolutely shameful!

Mr. Wright's "settlement" offer is a disgrace. We reject it and will continue our defense of the innocent developers he has targeted. I thought it important to explain why. coindesk.com/consensus-maga…

@Arthur_van_Pelt Wait hot shot, you might need to look into when latex files where created

🤡🤡🤡 The LaTex files of con man Craig Wright have been exposed as forgeries created between March 2022 and September 17, 2023 already. When you don't follow the court filings, you get this delusional nonsense. 🤦‍♂️

@Dr_CSWright damn! you're good.

Only a fixed protocol solves this.

Developers who act to stop court-decided outcomes in financial systems are often seen as moving away from principles of decentralization and move towards a fiduciary role. Decentralization, especially in blockchain and financial technologies, implies a distributed power structure without centralized control. In a truly decentralized system, no single party or group of developers should have the authority to unilaterally influence or reverse decisions, including those determined by a court. However, when developers intervene in this manner, they assume a role that is more characteristic of a fiduciary. A fiduciary is entrusted with the responsibility to act in the best interest of others, often holding a position of power or trust. By taking actions to override or prevent court decisions, developers are exercising a form of centralized control and influence, thereby acting in a capacity that mirrors the role of fiduciaries rather than proponents of decentralization. This behavior suggests a shift from the ideal of a completely autonomous and decentralized system to one where developers can exert significant influence or control, akin to traditional financial systems where certain entities have fiduciary responsibilities. This contradicts the foundational ethos of blockchain technology, which advocates for eliminating central points of control or influence.

@CalvinAyre @olvelez007 @saylor Hopefully he didnt commit fraud, that might make this even dumber.

I'm trying my best to stay away from predictions, but this one I can't resist: No one, and I mean, no one is going to remember Warren Buffett in the future as the greatest investor. They are going to remember @saylor. #Bitcoin only.

@satoshi Brilliant

@agerhanssen @CalvinAyre @nChainGlobal @Dr_CSWright Now why the f&$k would he buy nchain for that amount if Craig was a con man?? Get real and talk less smart guy.

The official statement when @CalvinAyre acquired a majority part of @nChainGlobal for 570MUSD was a typical Calvin bluff. The biggest bluff is however the claim that @Dr_CSWright is Satoshi. @CalvinAyre @Dr_CSWright had for years tried to pull of the biggest business bluff in history. Stefan Matthews @TurkeyChop and @CalvinAyre is both complicit in helping @Dr_CSWright with this. It’s a disgrace to see how @CalvinAyre is manipulating the #BSVCryptocurrency market he controls himself. It’s for sure in the public interest that I have made the public aware of the situation. As Stefan Matthews @TurkeyChop said it when confronted him about the 570MUSD deal. “This is all fucking fluffy shit” Read about Calvin Ayre and what is claimed to be his unregulated online gambling business: Offshore Casino and Sportsbook Bovada Faces Kentucky Lawsuit! bleachernation.com/betting/2023/0…

@kararesurrect High iq ? You’ll have a bit more of an humbling experience in couple months. .

@ShreyaPattar I like

How to explain to such “men” that if you want to copy red-pill tweets, you should at least have a red-pill personality & physique to go with it

@Van_City_VC You won’t be disappointed.

My interest in #BSV was not due to people speaking positively about it. It was #BTC supporters being so obsessed with bashing it. Very often a fail safe way to identify opportunity. Usually only those afraid of a superior competitor act that way. Not always but often

@agerhanssen @CalvinAyre @Dr_CSWright Don’t be confused by what you don’t know. You’re at another level you should know better.

@sjbailey1970 @rockwallet Nice work Steve . Thanks

@Bullsarein @rockwallet Washington State is on the roadmap. We recently completed Florida and Texas, so only a few more to go then we will have the full house!

Hey everyone! 🚀 Are you a RockWallet user or not? We're eager to hear from ALL of you! Your feedback is invaluable. Take our quick survey via this link: hubs.li/Q021MqBP0 for a chance to win $100 USD. Let's make this community stronger together!