Jack Mayhoff

1.2K posts

Jack Mayhoff banner
Jack Mayhoff

Jack Mayhoff

@BullshidoMaster

82nd Airborne US Army Vet. 1/505 PIR Afghanistan 2002-2003

New York, USA Katılım Temmuz 2023
235 Takip Edilen72 Takipçiler
imperfectlyperfect
imperfectlyperfect@TLHb6bh·
I think it’s appropriate to address this question in a post because I keep seeing the same accusation repeated over and over! See comment 👇! First of all, Erika looked exhausted, disheveled, and heartbroken. There was nothing “gleeful” about her. What people are deliberately twisting is this: she was encouraged that so many people loved her husband that they wanted to buy memorabilia honoring him. She was emotional knowing his legacy would continue. She was moved that people wanted something tangible to remember Charlie by. That is not greed. That is grief mixed with gratitude. And let’s not forget the context. She was speaking to employees who had just witnessed a horrific and traumatic event. In the middle of her own devastation, she pulled herself together to encourage them and give them some sense of hope and purpose moving forward (and some of them betrayed her)! It wasn’t about money. Erika does not need money. It was never about money!!! Weaponizing the rawest moments of a grieving widow in order to score points in an online narrative is immoral. Seems to be the theme these days. You’re so right! This is definitely the face of a gleeful widow. Be so for (expletive) real! 🙄
Nodramamomma@CindyReinhard19

@TLHb6bh How about a recent widow, gleeful over sales merchandise, 5 days after her husband was assassinated...is that morally acceptable?

English
126
68
1K
125.7K
Jack Mayhoff
Jack Mayhoff@BullshidoMaster·
@realDailyTrite Why does she need “sympathy” if they’re her fans? Wouldn’t fans just continue supporting her bc they agree with her?
English
0
0
2
17
Daily Trite🇺🇸
Daily Trite🇺🇸@realDailyTrite·
I'm calling it now. Candace Owens is going to get pregnant as the lawsuits start piling up so she can win sympathy points from her fans to raise legal funds and more defenders online. It still won't save her but I know there isn't anything this Machiavellian narcissist won't do to avoid responsibility for her incessant lies.
Daily Trite🇺🇸 tweet media
English
367
67
700
23.7K
Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton
Jenn nailed it. I have a response video coming, but the fact is @RealCandaceO, @baroncoleman, and several other Candace simps coordinated a campaign to straight-up lie about me and the circumstances. These are verifiably corrupt people who will lie and slander without a second thought if it benefits them. Experiencing what they do firsthand just proves what kind of people they are. Newsflash, Candace, you won’t stop me. I will continue to expose you for the liar, con artist, and anti-American propagandist that you are.
Jenn The Producer@HotBrandMedia

You’re pretending “implication” doesn’t matter. It absolutely does. She repeatedly implied that Gary/@paramounttactcl was part of a behind-the-scenes TPUSA/Erika Kirk/Andrew Colvette operation. The implications were clear: Candace implied Gary was taking direction from TPUSA. Candace implied Paramount Tactical was being used as a PR weapon against her. Candace implied Gary was involved in a coordinated pressure campaign to stop or control her interview with Mitch Snow. Candace implied Gary was connected to threats or intimidation behind the scenes. A normal person hearing that would not walk away thinking, “Oh, she just means he had an opinion.” They would reasonably believe Gary was secretly working with TPUSA or Erika Kirk to target Candace. That is exactly how defamation by implication works. You do not have to say the exact words “Gary is paid by TPUSA” for the meaning to be defamatory. If you arrange facts, insinuations, and accusations in a way that causes the audience to believe something false and damaging, that can still be defamatory. So no, I didn’t lie about the implications. I understood them exactly the way Candace intended her audience to understand them.

English
111
52
386
16.4K
Jack Mayhoff
Jack Mayhoff@BullshidoMaster·
The way TPUSA is acting is NOT normal, at all. Sorry, not sorry. There’s so many lies about Erika’s past, nobody seems to care that there are serious questions about the way Charlie died as well as things surrounding that day, and TPUSA doesn’t seem to want answers. Now we have suspicious viewing of a video why not release it if people question it? I didn’t know Charlie and I seem to care more than ANY of his so called friends (at TPUSA) and his own wife.
English
0
0
7
191
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
I’m sorry but I still can’t get over this. Turning Point USA colluded with the Daily Mail to host a screening of the now “secret video” of Charlie naming Erika as his successor. This video is crucial. It was introduced to the public by Erika as Charlie’s dying wish: her takeover of the company. Erika CHOSE to walk out to Charlie’s alleged voice naming her as the CEO at Amfest, but stopped short of airing the video footage. Donors who were present say the audio is A.I., and that Charlie never uttered these words at the event in question. Turning Point is now gaslighting us—bringing in experts to secretly screen and report on the video while claiming its existence doesn’t even matter because Charlie had told his friends that’s what he wanted. WTF is going on?
Candace Owens tweet media
English
1.2K
1.9K
12K
295.7K
Jack Mayhoff
Jack Mayhoff@BullshidoMaster·
@JayVTheGreat Maybe because she’s a liar and doesn’t seem to care about getting to the bottom of who killed her husband? Just a guess… 🙄
English
0
0
0
9
Jay’V
Jay’V@JayVTheGreat·
Why is Candace Owens obsessed with Erika Kirk? It’s getting weird.
English
674
135
3.2K
44.9K
Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton
All facts that prove @RealCandaceO lied to you and acted with malice and reckless disregard for the truth. This is what evidence and "receipts" look like. Candace would hate if you shared this video.
Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton@paramounttactcl

Undeniable proof that @RealCandaceO lied. She didn’t just get it wrong — she knowingly lied to her audience, treating them like idiots. This is also clear evidence of reckless disregard for the truth and actual malice in her defamation of Brian Harpole and Erika Kirk. I break down exactly why she’s going to lose the Harpole defamation case. Watch below 👇 *Uploaded the directly to X bc I know some don't like switching platforms to view videos. This one's important for people to see. Please share! @dhillonlaw

English
171
162
634
18.8K
Tricia Brooks
Tricia Brooks@tricia_dejong·
I see no tears but a lot of drawn in eyebrows. 👀
Tricia Brooks tweet media
English
219
139
1.3K
24.2K
Daily Mail US
Daily Mail US@Daily_MailUS·
Bombshell secret video of Charlie Kirk naming his true Turning Point successor days before assassination trib.al/L3uvxtz
Daily Mail US tweet media
English
212
15
252
1.5M
Jack Mayhoff
Jack Mayhoff@BullshidoMaster·
@bren45000 Or if you keep reading she explains why she did it that way.
English
2
0
5
177
Bren
Bren@bren45000·
Surely someone on Candace’s team told her that this post was bonkers, right? So, to be clear: She obtained a leaked White House email, and instead of just showing us the email, she instead … Retyped a portion of the email and then took a screenshot of what she just typed? That makes literally no sense. Unless she doesn’t want to show us the alleged leaked email. Which begs the question: why? Probably because her leaked White House email hasn’t been verified, and maybe one of her fans dropped it in her email tip box—and she can’t show us the actual email because either it doesn’t exist … or she knows it will be debunked if she publishes it. Smells … fishy.
Bren tweet media
English
125
38
574
25K
Baron Coleman
Baron Coleman@baroncoleman·
That TPUSA employees are retweeting this and think this is some sort of sick burn and a winning point tells me just how out of touch they are with reality. I actually appreciate the troll "TLHb6bh" (if that is your real name) for clipping this and nicely archiving an important part of the development of my investigation into who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why. That some washed up former radio host and small podcaster would accumulate tens of millions of views investigating what happened to Charlie Kirk speaks volumes about the importance of the investigation TPUSA employees desperately want to bury. This is especially true when you consider the TPUSA staff, including the ones who retweeted this, appear to show zero concern with finding out who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why. They dismiss every person trying to find out the answers to those questions as evil or motivated by greed (also known as evil). It never dawns on them that people want to know those answers. They seem mystified by people wanting to know those answers. They try in vain to stifle anyone trying to find those answers. I came to this as a concerned American citizen who doesn't want public figures assassinated in broad daylight. I sent my research to several established podcasters to see if they'd do the story, and I only decided to do it myself when they didn't respond to my emails. So, yes, I want to run down every lead, turn over every stone, and ask every question that could lead to an answer. How much more should Charlie Kirk's former employees and supposed friends want the same? And for some weird reason, those who were closest to Charlie, including TPUSA employees, have no interest in doing the same. I'm sorry. They just don't. It's true, and it's obvious to everyone that it's true. They'd rather slander and label as evil those pursuing what they should be pursuing. So, by all means, keep clipping archived videos. I'm proud of every word in them. I deny your baseless allegations, of course. But you know they're baseless. The reason you gish gallop so many of them in there is so they can't be refuted individually, so I'll deny them all as a whole. But thank you. Genuinely, thank you for taking the time to point out that some people actually still care who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why. And thank you dearly for contrasting it so starkly with those at TPUSA who do not.
imperfectlyperfect@TLHb6bh

What do you mean that you had shut down your podcast and gone private shortly before Charlie’s assassination? What do you mean that you never watched one episode of Charlie’s podcast? What do you mean that if someone had asked you a week prior to Charlie’s death how you felt about him, you would have said, “eh, you could take him or leave him… he wasn’t a saint, he wasn’t god”? You’ve spent the last 7 months making money off a man you openly admit you didn’t really care about. You had shut down your podcast and gone private, but then Charlie is assassinated and suddenly you care? Suddenly you become one of the loudest voices in the room? The truth is you saw an opportunity to capitalize on a man’s death and you took it. Then you pushed wild conspiracies and attacked his widow for a man that, by your own words, you could “take or leave.” You piled on and encouraged attacks against Erika. You demanded alibis for accusations you created out of thin air, while at the same time saying Tyler Robinson doesn’t have to prove anything and that the burden is on the prosecution to prove the case against him. So which is it? Because according to you, Tyler deserves the presumption of innocence, but Erika has to prove hers to the internet mob you helped create. You weaponized speculation, outrage, and social media for clicks and money. You turned a tragedy into entertainment. You helped spread harassment and suspicion toward a grieving widow while pretending to stand for truth and justice. But “eh’ you could take him or leave him”, right? You’re a reprobate, Baron Coleman.

English
237
394
3.1K
93K
Eric Burlison
Eric Burlison@EricBurlison·
@LeadingReport If this is true the CIA must return the documents IMMEDIATELY! We will be demanding answers!
English
112
191
2.2K
101.3K
Leading Report
Leading Report@LeadingReport·
CIA seized 40 boxes of JFK and MK-ULTRA files that were being processed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) for declassification.
English
768
3.4K
19.7K
5.2M
Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassenstein@EdKrassen·
BREAKING: Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer just released this video message to Congress, telling them how Ghislaine Maxwell has threatened her life, and the Trump DOJ has not released all of the evidence she supplied to them about Epstein and multiple Co-conspirators. Everyone needs to hear this! What are they hiding?
English
613
20.3K
50.9K
1.2M
Jackie Chea ⚖️
Jackie Chea ⚖️@Fair_and_Biased·
If you come into my comments with this, it’s an auto-block. Anyone declaring that Erika killed her husband is doing so without a shred of evidence, so I’ll assume you’re a liar who is acting in bad faith.
Jackie Chea ⚖️ tweet media
English
83
20
382
4.6K
Baron Coleman
Baron Coleman@baroncoleman·
@TKCrecovered @RealCandaceO She apparently doesn’t realize that visibility limitation doesn’t stop screen recording from capturing that microsecond where it shows before it says it’s limited.
Baron Coleman tweet media
English
10
18
282
8.8K
Jack Mayhoff
Jack Mayhoff@BullshidoMaster·
@CatQuestionsAll @MicahSexton10 @Gardyloo_Alert What if you’re wrong? Just what if? Don’t hold any view that you’re unwilling to reasses and change if necessary. That goes for everyone and everything. You can’t close your eyes to evidence and at the same time claim your opinion is truth.
English
0
0
0
7
The Great Gats🐝
The Great Gats🐝@Gardyloo_Alert·
Candace Owens thinks Erika Kirk’s honorary degree is DEI. Meanwhile Erika already holds a bachelor's degree in political science and international relations from Arizona State University, a Juris Master (J.M.) degree in American legal studies from Liberty University, and is allegedly currently pursuing a Doctorate in Biblical Studies from Liberty University. Candace has exactly 0 college degrees. Candace Jelly Owens ….she is the most insecure person in the podcast space and it’s making her such an angry person
English
238
73
737
20.7K
Mary 🕊️
Mary 🕊️@cutiieepie6·
Some guy tipped me ten dollars in quarters, and I’m still trying to figure out what kind of person thinks that’s acceptable. I just finished a DoorDash order, and he casually mentions he forgot to tip in the app—which, fine, not ideal, whatever. Then he dramatically pulls out a literal roll of quarters like he’s handing me the crown jewels. He looks me dead in the eye and says, “Sorry man, I didn’t tip on the app, this is all I’ve got.” Yeah, thanks. I love holding a handful of coins like it’s 1998. I don’t use change. I’m not a parking meter. I’m not walking around with rolls of quarters or dumping them into a Coinstar just to get the money I already earned. I took it because arguing over coins isn’t how I planned to spend my day, but that doesn’t make it okay. Tipping in quarters is peak absurdity. Tip in the app, tip in bills, tip digitally—literally anything that doesn’t involve me schlepping around loose metal. Acting like this is normal? Pure comedy. And yes, no one should ever think a pocketful of coins counts as a tip.
Mary 🕊️ tweet media
English
11.8K
87
757
547.2K
The Patriot Oasis™
The Patriot Oasis™@ThePatriotOasis·
🚨 BREAKING: BOMBSHELL ACCUSATIONS HIT REP. THOMAS MASSIE: A woman named Cynthia West, identifying herself as Massie's former girlfriend, is claiming that Massie pressured her into deviant sexual behavior and bribed her with $5,000 to stay quiet. He then had her fired from a congressional staffer job when she refused. West says Massie first reached out via DM on X in August 2024 — less than two months after his wife of 31 years died — and the alleged incidents followed. A complaint was reportedly filed in fall 2025, coinciding with Massie’s remarriage to a staffer 20 years younger. The man who loudly demanded Epstein transparency now faces very serious personal allegations of his own. This story is developing rapidly.
English
1.5K
2.5K
8.4K
351K