Bunker

39.7K posts

Bunker

Bunker

@BunkerPm

Neanderthalian (Haeresis est maxima mea pipianda non credere)

Hic sunt dracones! Katılım Nisan 2017
399 Takip Edilen163 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@LaVeritaWeb Richard Malka, avvocato che difese Charlie Hebdo dall'accusa di Islamofobia (sottotitoli in Italiano).
Italiano
1
8
18
0
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@DanielBordmanOG In Save private Ryan they also shows killing surrendering Germans, and this is a real war crime. So don't assume fiction represents just war. To justify the destruction of civilian Objects like bridge you need to demonstrate it has "effective contribution to military action"
English
0
0
0
2
Daniel Bordman
Daniel Bordman@DanielBordmanOG·
If you think blowing up a bridge is a war crime you are the problem. The final scene in Saving Private Ryan is about blowing up a bridge. Denying your enemy the ability to move heavy equipment over a river is not against the Geneva convention or whatever.
Daniel Lambert@dlLambo

The IDF has now destroyed 7 bridges over the Litani river. Blatant war crimes to seize a massive chunk of Lebanon. And the world is talking about empty ambulances in high questionable circumstances... When will they be stopped - they're destroying the world.

English
59
108
1.4K
38.3K
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@mboudry They didn't underestimate anything, they were sensitive enough when they said they couldn't offend only SOME religions.
English
0
0
0
9
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@DineshDSouza ''statue representing Muhammad''??? Come on, there are no such things. (the interviewer clearly said ''symbols'').
English
0
0
1
84
Dinesh D'Souza
Dinesh D'Souza@DineshDSouza·
With unnerving affability, these radio hosts in Belgium explain why they smash Jesus and Madonna statues in public but would not dare to smash a statue representing Muhammad or the Star of David.
English
129
184
787
55.2K
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@MauroV1968 Il mondo è pieno di gonzi che abboccano (e mi riferisco a quelli che commentano queste esche per allocchi).
Italiano
0
0
2
20
JustNancy
JustNancy@nancy_incognito·
@atrupar Trump says truths you don't have stuff in your toolbox for. That's why people elected him. And frankly , he never tries to pretend his life is perfect either. He doesn't make excuses for his former personal life. That's why I got he got in trouble for that Access Hollywood tape.
English
7
0
0
543
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
Trump on Joe Kent: "I'm not a fan of the guy ... His wife was killed. He remarried fairly quickly."
English
2K
929
5.8K
5.1M
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@Andalusio He didn't said that. He said ''A symbol''. The tweet transcript is wrong.
English
0
0
1
46
Omar Kaj
Omar Kaj@Andalusio·
@DVanLangenhove "Statue of Muhammad?" 🤨 He doesn't know. Does he? Even the reason that ISIS fighter in that video was horrified to have seen Mary/Mariam (AS) being made into an idol.
English
6
1
3
897
Dries Van Langenhove
Dries Van Langenhove@DVanLangenhove·
Belgian journalists smash statues of Mary and Jesus. A real, non-Belgian journalist asks them: “Would you smash a statue of Muhammad or the Star of David?” “No no no no that would be inappropriate” Brussels is the capital of self-hate. x.com/colmflynnire/s…
English
1.1K
4.3K
24.9K
527.9K
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@DVanLangenhove Btw, there cannot be a ''statue of Muhammad'' (and the interviewer said ''a Symbol of Muhannad'') that would be a problem by itself....
English
0
0
0
27
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@LandsknechtPike Better says other kingdoms. There was not such a concept of Nation with borders or people. Just kings & their subjects. There was not only land conquest, but also subjugation extorting tributes.
English
0
0
0
33
Aristocratic Fury
Aristocratic Fury@LandsknechtPike·
Medieval Christians and Muslims both believed that they had legitimacy to conquer other lands. They both conquered as much as they could while limited by internal wars. The idea that wars of conquest are inherently bad is modern and would get laughed at by both of them.
Natasha Montreal@NatashaMontreal

The Crusades were not random wars of aggression. The Crusades were the Eastern Christian response to centuries of Islamic conquest. They were primarily defensive wars. In early Christianity there were five centers of high authority: Rome, Alexandria, Constantine, Antioch, and Jerusalem. Each one had a Bishop and administered a large region, both politically and religiously. The origins were Apostolic and the cities were the core seats of Christian authority. Islam rose out of the Arabian Peninsula in the early 600s. Almost immediately after consolidating power in Arabia, the Muslim state launched rapid military expansion against its neighbors from 632 onward. Islam took 3 out of 5 of the Patriarchal Holy Sees (Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem) in the 7th century. The Crusades were the Eastern counteroffensive. The Muslims had conquered the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal) and were in Tours, France by 732. It took over 700 years for the Spaniards to expel the invaders. The Reconquista was a parallel Western front. The Ottomans laid seige to central Europe for hundreds of years. They took the Balkans and Constantinople fell in 1453. Vlad Tepes of Wallachia (reimagined in modern times as the horror character Dracula) fought them off heroically for 6 years and drove them out of his principality. They laid seige on Vienna in 1529 and were expelled from Vienna 160 years later. Only Rome remained from the original Holy Sees after 1453 when Constantinople fell. Things you don't learn in school these days.

English
33
63
621
34.9K
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@giuliomeotti Politicamente come sono orientati gli ebrei belgi verso il multiculturalismo?
Italiano
1
0
0
69
Giulio Meotti
Giulio Meotti@giuliomeotti·
In Belgio vivono 40.000 ebrei su una popolazione di 12 milioni di abitanti, circa lo 0,3% della popolazione totale e l'odio violento nei loro confronti è così estremo che ora è necessario l'intervento dell'esercito per proteggerli. Va tutto alla grande nel multiculturalismo europeo
Reuters@Reuters

Belgium deploys soldiers to city streets to provide extra security to the Jewish community following what officials said were antisemitic attacks in Belgium and the Netherlands reut.rs/41olOKM

Italiano
15
46
148
2.3K
Elder of Ziyon 🇮🇱
Elder of Ziyon 🇮🇱@elderofziyon·
Human Rights Watch @hrw immediately condemned one Russian missile cluster munition in 2022 that killed Ukranians. It hasn't said a word about hundreds of similar Iranian missile cluster bombs that killed more Israelis for three WEEKS. Because, yet again, to HRW, Jewish lives really don't matter. elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2026/03/human-…
English
40
440
1.2K
17.4K
Conversations with Coleman
Conversations with Coleman@ConvoswColeman·
Sam Harris: “You can logically differentiate antisemitism from anti-Zionism…those are distinct, at least in principle.” “But in practice…the unique focus on Israel as a country that has a problem justifying its right to exist—I don’t know how else to explain that beyond some level of antisemitism.”
English
83
273
2.2K
106.8K
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@faniaoz because most of Jewish Israelis support settler violence. Most of them would like to expel even theri fellow Arab Israeli citizens.
Bunker tweet media
English
0
0
5
141
Fania Oz-Salzberger 🇮🇱🕊️🟣 פניה עוז-זלצברגר
Non-Israeli friends are asking me why we’re not all out on the streets demonstrating against Jewish settler terror in the West Bank. Their well-meant ignorance clearly shows that the international media is not reporting about our daily and nightly routine of missile attacks, sheltering at home, all schools shut, emergency law prohibiting assemblies. We are following the West Bank atrocities with anger and pain. And we still have the liberty to sign petitions.
English
125
155
917
55.9K
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@Curini Certo, ma ogni tanto c'azzecca pure Calenda. Gli errori si pagano. Tenersi non solo la zavorra ma chi ti danneggia pensando che tanto i sondaggi (temporaneamente) ti premiano alla lunga non paga.
Italiano
1
0
1
65
LuigiC
LuigiC@Curini·
@BunkerPm Il mio post é sul deliro di onnipotenza del nulla
Italiano
1
0
0
130
Costantino De Blasi
Costantino De Blasi@DeShindig·
Ora che succederà, si scoprirà finalmente qualcosa sull'omicidio di Garlasco? Il risultato del referendum è il frutto di una campagna elettorale idiota (si, idiota) fatta da entrambe le parti ma di più dalla maggioranza
Costantino De Blasi tweet media
Italiano
26
15
413
14.2K
Bunker retweetledi
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
The most brutal 40-second summary of Trump's disastrous Iran war. James O'Brien completely dismantles the incoherent, contradictory lies being fed to the public about nuclear capabilities, regime change, and the Strait of Hormuz. Absolute humiliation.
English
106
2.2K
5.6K
215.2K
Bunker retweetledi
Bill Madden
Bill Madden@maddenifico·
Iran is now releasing cartoons that Trump can understand. 😂🤣👇
English
1.9K
26.9K
128.5K
8.8M
Bunker
Bunker@BunkerPm·
@DanBurmawy Rabin was assassinated, and who is the current Minister of National Security in Israel?
Bunker tweet media
English
0
0
0
60
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
I recently met with an Israeli diplomat and adviser to the Israeli government, who is also the president of an organization that operates in Israel and the United States. As I was explaining the theological nature of the war against Israel, he told me: “After October 7, we realized that it was a theological war.” This was not just a random Israeli; this was someone who, for decades, has been close to the inner circles of decision-makers in Israel. I will never understand how it took Israelis 80 years to realize that this was a religious war, not only against them, but against the entire non-Muslim world. Tucker Carlson just published an interview with an Israeli diplomat whose language sounded more like that of a philosopher detached from reality. According to him, it is Israel’s fault that there was no peace because Israel did not properly respond to Arab peace initiatives. Which peace initiatives? Sadat? Israel returned Sinai, welcomed him to speak at the Knesset, and he was assassinated by the Muslim Brotherhood because he stretched his hand in peace. Oslo? Rabin was assassinated yes, but later Ehud Barak, at Camp David II, offered Arafat far more than what Rabin had offered in Oslo, yet Arafat walked away. It is simply sad to see people who can't grasp the nature of this war, a war that has cost them catastrophe after catastrophe for 80 years.
English
50
174
930
33.3K
David Lambert
David Lambert@Winter_Six·
They don't get it. The vast majority of US forces aren't even involved in this thing. They're running routine exercises and doing whatever they're assigned unrelated to Epic Fury. This conflict is a live-fire training exercise.
Mortdecai Marklarian Fignopple Smith@DavidAririeri

This is a U.S. force at peacetime strength: effectively one aircraft carrier, as the second is heading back to the States, along with fewer than 200 fighter jets and even fewer bombers this serves as training for US Air Force recruits. the average age of the pilots is around 23.

English
11
85
1.2K
74.8K
Bunker retweetledi
Rosemary Kelanic
Rosemary Kelanic@RKelanic·
This creative misreading of the Suez Crisis misses the point. Trump’s Iran war is already the US’s Suez Moment — the inflection point where US strategic decline becomes painfully undeniable. Britain, France and Israel lost Suez because they overestimated their own military and economic strength. Israel was acting as a revisionist and expansionist power, and tag-teamed with stronger Western allies to attempt to redraw Mideast borders in a supposedly “preventive” war against Nasser’s Egypt— in that case, the fear that Nasser would close the Suez Canal. *The war itself* then provoked Nasser to close canal. 🤦🏼‍♀️ Sounds familiar, eh? The author wrongly concludes, however, that Uk, France & Israel’s mistake was backing down, and hence, destroying their own credibility. The ACTUAL mistake was starting the war to begin with. Fighting for the sake of “preserving credibility” is like chasing losses at a casino. Genuine credibility can’t be manufactured by fighting. It naturally flows from vital national interests. The U.S. doesn’t need to “prove” it will fight for its core interests, like defense of the homeland from attack. The credibility of retaliation to attack on the U.S. homeland is inherent. (Kind of like how Iran’s threats to retaliate to US/Israel attacks on its territory were also inherently credible. Trump was foolish to discount them.) Where U.S. leaders have screwed up too many times is in trying to manufacture false credibility when the issues at stake *don’t* threaten core U.S. interests — like regime change in Iran, ending Iran’s support for Hamas and Hezbollah, etc. and all the other demands Israel foisted on the US-Iran nuclear talks. Everyone knows Iran cares a lot more about its own survival than the U.S. cares about Iran’s survival. The war is existential for Iran but NOT existential for the US. That means the balance of interests favors Iran, and always will, no matter what crazy hoops the U.S. jumps itself through, at great cost, to try and prove otherwise. That’s how we ended up fighting 20 years in Afghanistan to replace the Taliban with the Taliban. They outlasted us and everyone knew they eventually would. Let’s hope Trump deescalates the conflict and avoids the credibility trap in Iran, which leads only to quagmire. @defpriorities wsj.com/opinion/americ…
English
47
283
807
66K