ZK

one last thing i will say about this (& then i am truly done) cuz i like dean’s writing. but when you visibly now have a giant incentive structure attached to you & expecting ppl to ignore that is like asking ppl to respect your pronouns no matter how complex they are. ironically it’s the intellectual elites that have this expectation. & no it doesn’t matter how just off the cuff your writing is or what not. no matter how hard you try to rationalize away your potential bias or how unconscious it is, it exists. same with researchers who post here who work at big labs (take it with a grain of salt). & if you as a writer put this burden on your reader, you have failed in your writing.

最傻的就是，别人说你是“股神”，你就真的信了， 并且有了偶像包袱。 然后一副人间清醒的姿态。 说白炒股赚那3000万，其实也不多。 就字节同僚里稍有慧根与机缘者，凭借职位与信息优势同样可以拿到，不过是先达后到的问题。 海力士跌了，你说你早跑了以示优越，结果却接盘了美光，请问现在怎么看待你持仓的 $MU ? 别人让你晒仓位，你只晒个收益率；后续质疑你，你就开始阴阳怪气，最后干脆说中文区是粪坑。 这不是中文区的问题，是你自己的问题。 非得一直捧你为股神，你就高兴了，真有本事就拿后续战绩堆出来。 给自己的遮羞布和心理代偿就是：“嘻嘻，你们骂我吧，这样有利于我的创作者收益呢~” 一边装逼脱离群众，一边又这么在意吃推特这碗饭。 这种心态看起来不像个成熟的交易者。 我看到的不过是一个恰好赶上市场红利的赌徒。

Yeah exactly. I've reviewed a lot of human code in my career. Every company I have worked at over the last 20 years has been an "every change needs to be reviewed before merge" type of shop. And in the process I've caught an enormous number of bugs and logic errors. Almost everything I review has problems. Reviewing AI code honestly doesn't feel much different to me than human code ever did. Most of the problems I catch feel just like problems I've seen in human code. I feel like the people complaining about AI code quality must never have been in a role where they are regularly reviewing their colleagues' code?

AI is great, but it does not protect you against inflation. Bitcoin does.

Tokenization isn’t just putting stocks onchain. It’s creating a more efficient market with global access, continuous liquidity, and programmable settlement. That’s a fundamental upgrade to capital markets.

An initial startup idea can't usually be both grand and precise. In practice they're usually either grand and vague or precise and small. Precise and small is better. You know who your initial users are, and you expand outward. With grand and vague you can't even get started.

there are a lot of benchmarks that suggest 5.6 sol is the best model in the world right now, but the most reliable way to tell is that elon is obsessed with me again