FinTwits by Hovda

501 posts

FinTwits by Hovda banner
FinTwits by Hovda

FinTwits by Hovda

@ByHovda

#Fintwit account focusing primarily on Nordic small caps. Favorite sectors: energy, industrials, tech

Katılım Mayıs 2021
88 Takip Edilen169 Takipçiler
FinTwits by Hovda retweetledi
JH
JH@CRUDEOIL231·
It wouldn’t be the worst-case scenario, at least in the sense it achieves the same effect without needing to land ground forces on Kharg Island, thus avoiding unnecessary bloodshed on the ground. That is not to say, however this is a positive development. There will be four major repercussions: 1) It will cut off ~2mb/d of Iranian crude exports—the only flow that persisted even during the conflict—from the global supply. 2) By declaring a "blockade on vessels that paid illegal tolls to Iran," even the few remaining tankers will find passage through the SoH impossible. While they may not have literally paid $2 million, the US declaration effectively terminates any possibility of transit negotiations with Iran. 3) If Iranians can no longer export their own oil, their incentive to keep the SoH open vanishes entirely. There is no way they will sit back and watch GCC tankers pass while their own taps are dry. 4) Although the talks in Islamabad have already collapsed, this hardline stance effectively slams the door on any future diplomatic channels. Trump may expect this economic strangulation to force Iran into making concessions at the negotiating table, but the probability of that is remarkably low. Iran will certainly suffer a massive blow. However it is impossible to completely starve out a country has open land borders in every direction and is connected to Russia via the Caspian Sea. One must remember that Iran has already survived as a state during the pandemic, when exports plummeted to ~500kb/d amidst incredibly low oil prices. That was only a few years ago. Finally as the blockade is enforced, the likelihood of an unforeseen, direct military clash between the US Navy and the IRGC near the Strait will increase significantly. If the goal is purely to inflict pain on Iran, it will work well. But if the goal is to force a surrender, that simply will not happen. In the end Iran is more likely to turn toward further extremism. As for the impact on oil prices? I think you already know the answer to that. #oott #iran
Not Jerome Powell@alifarhat79

Trump just posted this

English
62
79
586
116.8K
FinTwits by Hovda retweetledi
Timothy Snyder
Timothy Snyder@TimothyDSnyder·
We fought and lost a war in Iran so that both the Iranians and the Russians could make far more money from oil—the Iranians from tolls, the Russians from higher prices and the end of sanctions. That isn’t just strategic defeat; it’s self-destructive foolishness at a level unknown to military history.
WarTranslated@wartranslated

Trump is likely to extend the Russian oil sanctions waiver as soon as Friday, Reuters reports. Fuel prices spiking from the Iran war have the administration worried ahead of midterms. reuters.com/business/energ…

English
251
4.2K
11.5K
307K
FinTwits by Hovda retweetledi
JH
JH@CRUDEOIL231·
That was brilliant—a perfectly balanced take, truly worthy of a top shipping expert in this space. The latter part of your point is especially crucial, so let me add a personal anecdote. Although I work in a different capacity, my firm is a major player in the tanker market. We’re often portrayed in a negative light by the media, much like Sinokor or Dynacom. Not long ago, some folks on FinTwit pointed to one of our specific vessels (I won’t name names) and claimed that, based on its trajectory, it was obviously paying off Iran to pass through or had already done so. Honestly i was so curious that tracked down the ship’s operator and asked if that was really the plan. Can you imagine what the response was? Sure it’s no secret that the shipping industry loves a good workaround. I won't deny that. However compliant operators avoid illegal activities. Once you cross that line, there’s no coming back. You get blacklisted from the mainstream market and end up in a head-on collision with Western governments. And frankly you don't even make money that way. Unless a company intends to trade exclusively in sanctioned barrels, they would never risk having their accounts frozen or their entire compliant fleet barred due to sanctions. You don’t risk losing everything just to chase pennies. So please don’t forget, the IRGC and its numerous affiliates are sanctioned entities. Even the guys you portray as gangsters want nothing to do with them. The idea that companies generating tens of billions in revenue would risk illegal exposure just to make a few million dollars on a single vessel... it’s a total fantasy. #oott #iran
Ed Finley–Richardson@ed_fin

@HFI_Research @citrini 13) Do not assume that just because you read something in Lloyd’s or BBG or the FT that it’s true. Never forget the lesson of the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. Iran wants to will a toll into being. It would be a disaster. Don’t help them by spreading propaganda. 🫡

English
18
35
384
50.7K
Andreas Steno Larsen
Andreas Steno Larsen@AndreasSteno·
The sentiment toward the US is as negative as I’ve ever experienced in the EU - not only because of the Iran war, but also due to JD Vance siding with Orbán and, indirectly, Russia over the past few days.
English
153
97
1.2K
40.6K
Andriy Che
Andriy Che@17thfellow·
@AyusoValue IBKR gives me permission error on submitting an order, weird as I bought on OSE before and have all the permissions
English
2
0
2
212
FinTwits by Hovda
FinTwits by Hovda@ByHovda·
If you’re looking for yield in this market… Start here: $DNO.OL $BNOR.OL $PEN.OL $OKEA.OL $COSH.OL Some of the most underfollowed cash machines on OSE. Full write-up ↓ norwaystocks.substack.com
English
0
0
2
110
Peter Lukacs Research
Peter Lukacs Research@Peter_Lukacs_R·
Do you have any offshore oil stocks worth taking a look at? Thanks
English
37
0
35
11.7K
Ari Fleischer
Ari Fleischer@AriFleischer·
When this is over, the western part of NATO will never be the same. Spain, England, France and Italy have sold us out, as they too often have a history of doing. Eastern European nations are the heart of NATO. They spend money on defense, know how to fight and love the US. France particularly deserves fault and blame. From supporting China and Russia at the UN to denying Americans overflight rights, they’re doing what they’ve always done - showing weakness, while cutting deals with terrorists. (The reason the US has a Marine Corps and Navy is unlike France, we refused to pay a ransom to the Barbary Pirates. France is always happy to cut a deal.) Wars have unintended consequences as nations show their true colors. NATO will never be the same, and Western European weakness and acquiescence is the cause.
English
11.5K
7.3K
37.7K
7.9M
Andreas Steno Larsen
Andreas Steno Larsen@AndreasSteno·
It's interesting how the MAGA movement now does everything to defend a war they essentially voted against in the election
English
176
121
1.9K
71.3K
FinTwits by Hovda
FinTwits by Hovda@ByHovda·
This is where the story changes: → Earnings largely locked in → Dividends moving closer → Valuation still compressed Those setups don’t usually last.
English
1
0
0
80
FinTwits by Hovda
FinTwits by Hovda@ByHovda·
$COSH.OL: Constellation just strengthened its investment case – materially. The Petrobras $PBR renegotiation (#Renecon) is now done. And it changes more than just backlog 👇
English
1
0
1
239