Zach Costello@ZachCostello_
There are three key moments that caused me to take the Candace Owens investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination case seriously, which I initially and admittedly, was skeptical of...
1) When Eric Bolling got caught lying about her on the Patrick Bet David podcast. He said Candace had not been invited to TPUSA events for years, when in fact it was verified she had been less than a year prior to his statement. He also claimed that Charlie Kirk had a "silent break up" with Candace for her "chasing down too many rabbit holes," which Andrew Kolvet himself denied and verified that they remained friends. Eric Bolling then returned to the Patrick Bet David podcast to rescind his statements, since they were false. This however did not stop Dave Rubin from reposting the false claims that Eric Bolling made at the time, stating that based on his own experience, what Eric said was true - so he blatantly lied too. This opened my eyes to the smear campaign being waged against her. Then...
2) After Candace Owens released the now famous text messages of Charlie saying that he had "no choice but to leave the Pro-Israel cause, they accused her of forging them and making them up. These obviously turned out to be very authentic as verified by the source, Andrew Kolvet. Funny, they are now the most important classified documents in American history and whoever leaked them must be hanged for treason. Finally...
3) Candace has identified strange activity that occurred the day of the assassination including the Egyptian plane that dropped military contractors in Provo, Utah the week leading up to September 10th, these contractors did not leave on the same plane the morning of the assassination. An eye witness at Utah Valley University claims to have seen an individual on the Losee Building rooftop the week prior to the assassination. This same flight landed in Wimington, DE under a special foreign dignitary status, which required escort by the FBI field office at One Rodney Square. This, in addition to the fact that there was a decoy (George Zinn) on the ground that day, who said he was paid to do so, vehicles seemingly working with the Dodge Challenger allegedly driven by Tyler Robinson before and after the assassination, along with online group chatter about the assassination beforehand, suggest that something bigger than just the 'lone wolf' Tyler Robinson could have taken place.
Further details have emerged about Erika Kirk and members of TPUSA not being truthful about how things played out that day like Mikey McCoy acting like a hero, Terryl Farnsworth not being truthful about why he took the cameras down behind Charlie, Tracy Martin not being truthful about why her daughter didn't show up to work like she was supposed to that day, when different members of TPUSA took their fights to Provo after they had received the news, etc. The inconsistencies, in a word, dishonesty, about these smaller details add fuel to the skepticism fire. It was a terrible thing that happened that day, but the easiest thing to do is be honest. You don't forget reality, that is unless you are trying to distort it.
I believe these items serve as the foundation of what Candace Owens, and other who have contributed, have done. I do not believe we are being told the full truth about what happened to Charlie Kirk just like we were not told the full truth about COVID, the lab leak, or the COVID vaccine...
I actually think it very naive to just blindly trust what we are being told at this point by those in positions of big power and influence.