CAMERA

🧵THREAD: Against the tide, we refuse to let lies about Israel in the news stand. Working across languages and continents, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting & Analysis (CAMERA) challenges errors, libels, and omissions, forcing the world’s most powerful newsrooms to correct themselves. By the year’s end, this coordinated effort has produced 789 media corrections in 2025 alone… Evidence that even as misinformation against Jews and Israel hardened into journalistic convention, one determined, multilingual team can still disrupt the narrative, defend the truth, and expose how lies in print and on screen put Jewish lives in danger off the page.

"The Israeli people are resilient. And matter of fact." Tricia Miller, Director of CAMERA's Partnership of Christians & Jews, on the mood in Jerusalem amid conflict with Iran.

A reliable news outlet wouldn't profile a physician who said that “Gaza has now poisoned the rest of the world” or “The Muslim lobby in the UK has weaponized civil society?” Any reporter who did that would immediately be labeled as an Islamophobe and promptly fired. So... why did @NBCNews profile Dr. Ghassan Abu Sittah? Known to be fond of terrorist organizations, Abu Sittah has publicly engaged in modernized antisemitic tropes, like claiming, “Israel has now poisoned the rest of the world,” and “The Zionist lobby in the UK has weaponized civil society.” camera.org/article/nbc-ne…

Richard Landes has been asking that question for years, and the answers are uncomfortable. From coining “Pallywood” to critically dissecting the Al-Durah Affair, he’s long argued that coverage of Israel isn’t just flawed, it can be dangerously misleading. In his 2022 book, "Can The Whole World Be Wrong?", Landes takes it further: what happens when journalism stops reporting and starts advocating? From erased context about incitement to headlines that invert reality, he lays out how narratives can fuel outrage, distort accountability, and even drive real-world antisemitism. The bigger question is, if “the whole world” gets the story wrong, who pays the price? Read @adamlevick's review of Landes' work: camera.org/article/can-th…

@CAMERAorgUK quoted in @TimesofIsrael on whether a sportswriter's column minimizing harassment against a business with Jewish roots meets the @guardian's editorial standards:

Read the full piece: jpost.com/opinion/articl…

In an op-ed for @Jerusalem_Post, CAMERA's @dmlitman notes that in "a normal world, mainstream journalism would be reporting on" the facts that plainly debunk Kent's conspiracy theories. Instead, the press is "playing the same deceptive game" as Kent.

Joe Kent’s resignation is all over the mainstream news. What isn’t? Who he ACTUALLY is — and why major media outlets aren't talking about it.🧵

A recent column in @guardian discusses harassment targeting a London branch of Gail’s Bakery, prompted by activists upset by the business’ Jewish roots. But according to a new @CAMERAorgUK analysis, the Guardian column frames vandalism and harassment against the bakery largely as understandable “symbolic” acts of protest rather than addressing the antisemitic implications. 👉 Share now to help fight against anti-Israel bias in the media. 🔗 Read the full report at camera-uk.org

Let’s get the history straight. The First Intifada is generally considered to have ended with the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993. This was meant to pave the way for a lasting peace. Israel recognized the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people, and the PLO (at least on paper) renounced terrorism and recognized Israel's right to exist in peace. For many, it felt like a turning point. But the violence didn’t stop. Even so, negotiations continued throughout the 1990s, building toward a major moment in 2000 at Camp David. There, a peace proposal was put forward that included the possibility of Palestinian statehood. Yasser Arafat rejected the offer. What followed would change everything. camera.org/videos-publica…

“Nobody likes war. The conditions are terrible. But it is our only chance for the regime to leave.” It is imperative to understand what the Iranian perspective actually is. Not what the regime is telling the world, but the reality on the ground from the people who are fighting for freedom. Inside Iran, the internet is barely alive, and so are the voices trying to break through it. Since the war began, the Islamic Republic has choked off connectivity. Messages fail. Making calls is impossible. What’s happening on the ground is becoming increasingly difficult to discern. But every so often, someone gets through. Here is CAMERA's newest U.S. media researcher @ShayKhatiri in @thedispatch: thedispatch.com/article/iran-w…