Corina Heijne ♀️

Het is niet dat ik "leef als een vrouw", ik *ben* een vrouw. Een volwassen mens van het *vrouw*elijk geslacht. De term "biologische vrouw" suggereert dat er ook niet-biologische vrouwen zijn.

@aeonsavi @hriengaalkn No woman who doesn't need pads/tampons carries them with her in case someone needs something.

@hriengaalkn Absolutely! I carry them on me in case someone needs something, solid point about the pad too

Trans women, c1s women, intersex women… there’s lots of women and tampons are in the boys room for trans boys Pretty simple really

@theisabelb That last sentence! 🎯

I was about 12 weeks pregnant when we taped this episode, and I was NOT havin it.

@DailyMail I'm sure he's devastated. Now he has to go back to being a mediocre man in the open category. Boo ffing hoo.

Transgender women dart players to be banned from female tournaments, says sport's regulator, in a blow for six-time champion Noa-Lynn van Leuven trib.al/qE2rBCR

@martynziegler @runthinkwrite That would the males. Women who erroneously think they are men are still welcome.

Transgender players banned from women’s darts events thetimes.com/article/a0579c…

@telegraaf @RoeliendenOuden Duh.

Noa-Lynn van Leuven (29) niet meer welkom bij vrouwentoernooien van de PDC #Echobox=1775749391" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">telegraaf.nl/sport/darts/no…

@mvaneerde @TheAliceSmith Yes. As many as there are human beings on earth.

@TheAliceSmith There are a lot more than two genders

“There are only two genders.” Wrong. There are only two sexes. There are no genders. The rest is called “personality”. Try it sometime.

@sanityexpert101 @ShitMyPaulSays @TheAliceSmith No human has ever been able to impregnate themself. Every single human being can be classified as either male or female.

@ShitMyPaulSays @TheAliceSmith The answer is greater than Twitter allows the unchecked to reply. Nut is most deviations are still male or female. True hermaphroditism is so rare there have been fewer than 1,000 cases in all of modern medicine out of billions

@yyzqommi @gghamari @OttawaPolice Do you even know what carpet bombing is or are you parrotting other people?

@gghamari @OttawaPolice Rich of you to call Iran occupied whilst you literally support a country that carpet bombed another and is planning real estate there. That same colonialist country is carpet bombing Lebanon this week, for the same purpose. Your brain’s occupied by israeli garbage.

I had a call with @OttawaPolice today. I was told if I don't delete my X posts where I say Mosques in Occupied Iran are hubs of terrorism and should be bombed, I would be charged under the Criminal Code of Canada. So I deleted my posts. Meanwhile, Mosques in Occupied Iran:

@IraninSA Liars.

Let it be remembered in history We have never started a war. We have never invaded anyone. We have not killed children. We have protected our homeland, dearer to us than our lives.

@MicheleKrech @Ant1Duval It always baffles me that supposedly intelligent people completely seem to lose their intellect when it comes to transpeople. Tell me, if T level is key, why do we hardly see any "transmen" entering male competitions?

In this post, @Ant1Duval and I assess the IOC's justifications for its new genetic sex testing policy and show that its claims of scientific consensus, consensus among female athletes, and compliance with human rights laws are completely unsubstantiated. verfassungsblog.de/ioc-genetic-se…

@ANanninga waarom?

@Fredayesthatone @SpeechUnion Being a nurse (or any health care professional) and not knowing the difference between women and men, that would be the worst.

@SpeechUnion The worst thing about this is she is a nurse but she was daft enough to believe anti trans talking points about sports. Those stories are only promoted by hate groups. They are “peaking” mechanisms that someone with brains would never fall for.

📣🚨Karen Webb, an NHS specialist nurse with 42 years’ experience working with older people, faced losing her honorary Queen’s Nurse title after being reported for gender-critical posts on X. The situation began during what should have been a standard team meeting. In the informal chat before proceedings began, Karen, in response to another colleague, expressed support for the Olympic Committee’s decision to exclude male athletes from women’s sporting categories. Within minutes, she received a private message from the Trust’s Head of Equality and Inclusion, informing her that she had “upset a lot of people”. The following day, she was told that her “attitude” towards transgender individuals needed to be discussed. Three months later, Karen was called to a formal meeting with senior figures at Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, where she was questioned about her views on trans people and her ability to provide them with compassionate care. Believing the matter to have been resolved, Karen was then contacted by the Queen’s Institute of Community Nursing (QICN), which informed her that it had received a complaint about alleged “transphobia” and “bigotry”. She was instructed to delete her social media posts or risk losing her honorary title. The experience caused her significant and understandable distress. At that point, Karen turned to the Free Speech Union for support. The FSU wrote to QICN on her behalf, setting out her legally protected right to hold and express gender-critical beliefs under the Equality Act 2010. Shortly thereafter, QICN dropped its investigation and issued a full apology, acknowledging that there was “no case to answer” and that Karen had “done nothing wrong”. Following a Subject Access Request (SAR), it emerged that the complaint had been made by a senior activist colleague, who had also disclosed information from a confidential internal process – despite that matter having been closed without any disciplinary action. This disclosure appeared to be a malicious attempt to damage Karen’s professional reputation and facilitate the removal of her honorary title. A subsequent grievance investigation by the NHS Trust upheld Karen’s complaint, finding that confidential information had been improperly shared with QICN. The Trust accepted that Karen had a reasonable expectation that discussions within the internal process would remain private, and confirmed that this expectation had been breached. The Trust has since stated that “appropriate action will be taken” to ensure lessons are learned and similar incidents do not occur again. Although the Free Speech Union was ultimately able to protect Karen’s title and prevent disciplinary action, the experience has left a lasting impact. Now retired, she reflects that the episode has cast a shadow over what should have been the culmination of a long and dedicated career in nursing. This sad episode resulted in Karen deciding it was time to retire. We are proud to have supported Karen during this difficult time. Cases like hers are far from isolated – more than 40 per cent of the Free Speech Union’s casework now involves individuals facing repercussions for expressing gender-critical beliefs, which are protected under the Equality Act 2010. Watch Karen share her story and join the Free Speech Union below 👇

@fickleskittle @Sal_Robins2 @Sorelle_Arduino Telling a 5 yo she is at some point going to "bleed from her vagina" is totally inappropriate.

@Sal_Robins2 @Sorelle_Arduino This guy is messed up, but on a whole I don't think there's any issue with fathers talking to their daughters about menstruation.

Social services do need to get involved He’s already told us he talks to his 17yr old daughter about his sex work & would support her doing the same Now his 5yr old daughter is talking to school staff about fears of bleeding from her vagina *I have edited the video to cut her out

Uiteraard heeft de @volkskrant mijn brief niet geplaatst nav het artikel van Mark @miserus over SRY-screenings bij de OS. Daarom plaats ik mijn brief maar hier. "Beste Volkskrant, Wat een – waarschijnlijk onbedoelde – hilarische vergelijking van jullie verslaggever om de deelname van Elis Lundholm aan de winter-OS de ‘evenknie’ te noemen van de deelname van Laurel Hubbard vijf jaar geleden! Er is namelijk een heel, heel belangrijk verschil: Lundholm deed mee in haar correcte geslachtscategorie, maar Hubbard deed mee in de vrouwencategorie, terwijl hij tot het mannelijk geslacht behoort.  Lundholm is niet de eerste vrouw die zich ‘trans’ noemt en toch niet dood neervalt door marginalisatie omdat zij bij haar eigen sekse meedoet: Hergie Bacyadan, Janjaem Suwannapheng, Raven Saunders, Nikki Hiltz, Quinn en Kristen Thomas gingen haar bv al voor als vrouwen die zich ‘trans’ noemden, en toch zonder problemen meededen binnen hun geslachtscategorie. Een prachtig voorbeeld voor de mannen met Heul Speusjale Identiteiten. Hierop aanvullend: De volgende keer dat de krant wil klagen over discriminatie, omstreden beslissingen of ontnomen kansen, misschien eens de naam van Feagaiga Stowers noemen uit Samoa, die niet naar de OS kon als vrouw omdat Hubbard al ging? Of voor de verandering eens Melissa Bishop, Joanna Jóźwik en Linsey Sharp noemen, die hun Olympische medailles misliepen omdat er na de 800m finale in Rio in 2016 DRIE MANNEN met de medailles naar huis gingen? Een ongekend sportschandaal waar de Volkskrant, voor zover ik weet, nog NOOIT over geschreven heeft?? Waarom heeft de krant telkens zo veel empathie voor mannen die buiten hun categorie sporten, maar niet voor vrouwen die daardoor zakken in rankings, medailles mislopen of zelfs zo hard geslagen worden door sporters die aantoonbaar man zijn (i.e. Lin Yu-ting en Imane Khelif), dat ze voortijdig de ring verlaten, zoals Angela Carini? Waarom heeft de krant niet meer oog voor de vrouwen die op alle mogelijke manieren benadeeld worden door het includeren van mannen in hun categorie? Waarom richt het tegenwoordig populaire ‘inclusiviteitsdenken’ zich alleen op vermeende gemarginaliseerde mannen? Waarom onderzoekt de krant niet het opvallende verschijnsel dat Imane Khalif steeds roept dat hij een rechtszaak aanspant tegen mensen die hem een ‘man’ noemen, maar dat die rechtszaken steeds niet van de grond komen? Of het opvallende verschijnsel dat nu het IOC de SRY-screening invoert, Khelif en Lin niet zullen meedoen aan de volgende OS, maar dat jullie krant hen desondanks tot in lengte van dagen ‘vrouw’ zal blijven noemen? #BelieveWomenVooralAlsHetEigenlijkMannenZijn Renske Verheul

@HomoSocialist Well yes. It's called *sex*uality for a reason. If per chance you believe in gender identities you would be having a homogenderal relationship with that "trans man".

@VoidNothin253 @PunishedAG @Boonatty1 Nobody comes to the conclusion that they're the opposite sex by themselves.

@CHeijne @PunishedAG @Boonatty1 and for all the guys that didnt get told shit and figured themselves out?

We already do gender affirming surgeries for c!s minors with gynecomastia. The unwillingness to do the same for trans minors is a blatant double standard and discrimination.

@VoidNothin253 @PunishedAG @Boonatty1 By people telling them from a young age they're actually boys. Some girls may see it as a way to escape the sexualisation they've been experiencing since puberty or even before that. Whatever the reason, girls can never be boys (or vice versa).

@CHeijne @PunishedAG @Boonatty1 deceived how? by themselves?

@VoidNothin253 @PunishedAG @Boonatty1 Gynaecomastia in boys (you know, human males) will often disappear without surgery. Girls having a double mastectomy because they've been deceived into thinking they're boys is the antithesis of perfectly fine.

@CHeijne @PunishedAG @Boonatty1 they arent girls to begin with so i dont see the issue, they are men with mental health issues due to growing breasts, which you seem to be in agreement is perfectly fine a reason for a child to get mastectomies

@VoidNothin253 @PunishedAG @Boonatty1 Gallactorrhea is often caused by pituitary tumors or thyroid problems. Gynaecomastia may seem like a minor inconvenience but can have serious MH implications. None of this has anything to do with girls having their healthy breasts cut off.

@CHeijne @PunishedAG @Boonatty1 What's serious about men growing breasts?

@ABeth6226 @Gaynotqueer1 Males. Males. Males. Males. And you'll find that the vast majority of female athletes is in favour of a once in a lifetime cheek swab.

@Gaynotqueer1 I agree with them. The bans are due to prejudice from conservatives. If Trans women were a threat to women’s sports , female athletes would be speaking for the bans. The WnBa is all about womens rights so if there was an issue the players would be supporting the bans

For the millionth time, I wonder how women can do this to other women.