@K8tlyn_11@CTKayMarie@AlanJayJackson “I know I said I hit him but did I say it as many times as they said I did?” —Karen Read (on one of the many interviews she gave).
Alan Jackson:
“When someone says something in an unguarded moment, believe them”
Like when your client said “I hit him I hit him I hit him”???
Kinda like that @AlanJayJackson?
@K8tlyn_11@AlanJayJackson She admits to it though. We are well past this particular denial. It does not matter if reports say it or audio captures it.
SHE. ADMITS. IT.
Too bad no one put that in their reports, caught it on camera despite them saying she was “hysterical and screaming”, or even took her into custody that night!!! Usually when a dead man is found and the spouse is saying AT the crime scene “ I hit him I hit him I hit him” they would at the least take her into custody to get details on her statement, or maybe document it??? So either it didn’t happen or the police are that incompetent that despite hearing a confession, having multiple law enforcement available they instead just let her leave and never report that until years later???? Sure that sounds totally possible!
It started with Karen Read’s phones, seized under Tully’s probable cause warrant, and, apparently, never searched.
From there, it turned into a full courtroom fight over standing, prosecutorial independence, who exactly “we” is, whose options count as “our various options,” and whether Cosgrove’s own words gave away a little too much.
Alan Jackson came out swinging. His basic theme was simple: “In appearance” is the whole case. He argued that the warrant existed because the Commonwealth advanced a theory that Karen engaged in witness intimidation, which led to the seizure of her phones and her private information.
So, when the Commonwealth says any conflict belongs to Aidan and somehow skips over Karen, Jackson’s answer was essentially: whose phone is it, exactly?
Then he moved to the heart of it. Jackson focused on Cosgrove’s February 19 remarks about wanting time to review Judge Krupp’s decision, meet, discuss “our various options,” and decide whether “we” were giving the phones back, moving for reconsideration, or filing a notice of appeal. Jackson’s point was that personal and possessive pronouns are far from insignificant. In his view, Cosgrove’s own words showed coordination with the very office he was supposed to be independent from.
Cosgrove, for his part, came in slower and calmer, speaking with the steady rhythm of one of those old adventure movie snakes swaying back and forth while everyone gradually forgets what the original question was. He denied any conflict, said Jackson’s version was “quite damning” except that those were supposedly different comments, leaned on his affidavit, and then glided straight into an attack on Alan's credibility (bomb).
That led to one of the stranger turns of the afternoon. Cosgrove brought up prior judicial findings about candor, aimed that detour squarely at Jackson, and then threw Jackson’s own Maya Angelou line back at him: when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.
A hearing about seized phones somehow found its way into a guest appearance by Maya Angelou, which probably belonged on very few bingo cards.
Jackson, in reply, found that move rich. He called the attack personal, beneath the dignity of counsel (😂) and the court, and treated it as a transparent pivot away from the real issue.
Judge Doolin even got in the old “pound the table” line, which honestly fit the moment.
Jackson wanted the court to focus on independence, or the appearance that it had vanished. Cosgrove wanted the court to focus on standing, his affidavit, and the credibility of the other side.
Somewhere in the middle sat Karen’s phones, still doing an impressive amount of legal heavy lifting.
Maya Angelou somehow became the unofficial authority of the afternoon:
“Courage is the most important of all the virtues because without courage, you can’t practice any other virtue consistently.”
@B_DiTullio329@TuesdayGazette John broke the tailight with his cocktail glass and shattered it. She then reversed in a rage at him and swiped him with just enough force to send him backwards hitting his head on the ground or the fire hydrant, scraping his arm on the winter barren, sharp shrubbery.
Karen Read argued to the court recently that she has two hearings for today, and that the 45 minute-ish drive between both court locations would be too difficult to do despite that one is in the morning and the other is hours later in the afternoon.
The court did not agree with her.
After making the argument, she never even showed up to her first hearing in person.
Karen is seen in Seaport walking around with Alan Jackson and another man.
@CTKayMarie@Andieldufrense He sold his soul to the devil in Hollywood so to him, now, it's worth it but one day he will meet the Lord. I wish I could be there.
Here is today’s hearing regarding Karen Read’s phones. Alan Jackson fighting to have her phones returned as though their lives depended on it.
(Or at least their freedom) maybe because there’s some incriminating material on her phones?
@UntwistedLive@Case1034521625 Just FYI-you can change the volume of the Picture in Picture and make your own mic more even with it. I can’t hear the hearing-but when you respond it’s super loud. 🥲 (watching the replay)
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in vehicular accidents/incidents and Karen’s legal team still has the comedic nerve to claim his injuries were “inconsistent with a vehicular incident” and loads of dummies have fallen for it.
😐😑
@Andieldufrense@SisterWendy23 It’s the forked tongue. It’s grating on the ears of those of us who have sharpened discernment. He does nothing but lie, spin, obscure, obfuscate the truth. I hope his piles of cash he’s made are comfortable to sleep on at night.
@SaltySteno I mean is this your first time defending someone who has been wrongly accused and witch-hunted online, salty?
Now try doing it with your whole chest, with courage, and when the wolves are at your door waiting to tear you limb from limb then we can talk “my history”.
@CTKayMarie I mean, I know your history and while I’m all for second chances and growth through adversity, you can’t just forget where you come from — or expect everyone else to — just because you change your Twitter handle.
@SaltySteno Where I come from?
Those are fighting words.
I have always come from a place of fighting these bullshit online campaigns against innocent people. Exchange Colin for any of the other faces who have been marginalized and condemned and for some the bullying was a death sentence.