
Call me Tom
684 posts

Call me Tom
@CTforyou
I retweet valuable tweets out of thousands of shitposts from Crypto Twitter. In since 2017, i know who makes the cut. Save time, be smart.




Some of the FUD started just because people saw that our X account shows Egypt as a location. We honestly don’t understand what that has to do with the project, and we don’t understand this kind of racism or mindset. Pumpad is built by a team of 4 members from different places. One location does not define a project, its vision, or its integrity. At the same time, Galaxe had some issues with their users, everything happened together, and the chart reacted. From there, people jumped into hate and FUD without looking at the bigger picture. It all came out of nowhere and emotions took over. If we ever wanted to scam, we could have done it a long time ago. We didn’t. We never bundled Pumpad. We don’t hold supply. The only tokens we ever had were given back to you through staking. And still, we kept building every single day. From day one, our platform was designed to keep your tokens and your money as safe as possible. We could have required users to deposit tokens for staking like many platforms do, but we never asked for that. Your tokens always stay in your own wallet. That was a deliberate choice. We don’t even have to write this. We could simply say “the project was killed by the community” and walk away. But we know there are people who stayed, who believed, and who didn’t deserve this kind of chaos. We never expected the community to react like this, but it happens. We’re still here.





TLDR You’re paying ~35% more for a business that’s 4 to 5x bigger. On 11/5, $avici traded at ~1.3x (premium) throughput with ~$1.6M spend and ~7k holders. By the November update, spend had already grown to $4.1M with ~68% retention. Today it trades at ~0.4x (discount) with $7.1M spend, 4 to 5x higher usage, and similar ~70% retention rate. Price is ~35% higher but fundamentals are multiples larger. After a ~$100M cap peak the holders only moved from 13.5k to 12.6k. That’s shrimps/weak hands getting washed out; not the abandonment of a thesis. Keep in mind this is before business accounts, @moonpay , and trust score based on chain consumer finance even beginning to kick in. On top of this @AviciMoney drafted the most founder/holder aligned proposal I’ve see to date from all @MetaDAOProject projects. This is the market handing you a layup value play while it’s still looking backward.





In the last 24 hours, pump fun purchased $885,799 worth of $PUMP, which equals 99% of the previous day’s revenue This brings its total purchases to $231,933,213 to date


Pumpad Roadmap January 2026 • Enable fees across all Pumpad features • Launch Pumpad Telegram bot creators can add it to their groups to track all pool activity • Rework Safu Launch • Launch the first project via Safu Launch • Marketing push begins • Auto buyback system for $PUMPAD from platform fees and creator rewards • Team expansion • Apply for $PUMPAD CEX listings February 2026 • Launch the first Pumpad native liquidity • Full Pumpad platform rework • Launch Pumpad’s own launchpad, with: Native liquidity pools • Custom smart contracts for different launch styles • Pump.fun token launches still supported at the beginning • Option for creators to choose between Pump.fun or Pumpad • Roadmap added and maintained on our Docs page pumpad.fun/roadmap




