Cailan Cook

48.7K posts

Cailan Cook banner
Cailan Cook

Cailan Cook

@CailanCook

Cultural Cynic 🤡🌍 | 27, Englishman 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 | BA (Hons) in Media Production 🎬

South East, England Katılım Ocak 2010
968 Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
ARC Raiders
ARC Raiders@ARCRaidersGame·
Someone forgot to close the Stella Montis doors on their way out... Check your corners, the Flashpoint Update drops next week! 😱
English
595
291
5.9K
843K
Cailan Cook retweetledi
Andrew Bridgen
Andrew Bridgen@ABridgen·
Official narratives called it a 'wait-and-see' approach. The data calls it a collapse. This report examines the correlation between 2021 mandates and the global fertility slump, vindicating the concerns I originally raised in Parliament. Accountability starts with the facts and unpalatable truth 👇 docs.google.com/document/d/1FL…
English
9
75
210
5.9K
Cailan Cook retweetledi
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
Our national billboard campaign starts today…
Rupert Lowe MP tweet media
English
964
7.1K
46.8K
389.1K
Cailan Cook retweetledi
Cailan Cook
Cailan Cook@CailanCook·
@AcademicAgent_X Their precious dome has been pierced for the first time this evening it seems. Things are getting real, expect hysterical crash-outs of a magnitude higher than every day before.
English
0
1
3
101
Cailan Cook retweetledi
Dave Smith
Dave Smith@ComicDaveSmith·
The polls tell us that this is the most unpopular war, going in, in American history. The President claims (and at least possibly believes) that it is 100% supported. It’s impossible to overstate how insane this all is.
English
1.2K
2.9K
27.5K
368.8K
ARC Raiders Informer
ARC Raiders Informer@ArcRaidersInfo·
Footage of an upcoming Big Arc in Arc Raiders called the ‘Bishop’ recently surfaced! 🤖
English
59
34
732
133.4K
Cailan Cook
Cailan Cook@CailanCook·
@SwipeWright @BretWeinstein What differentiates mere speculation from “wild” speculation? Why do you think you get to decide the terms of other people’s research, investigatory work & well-sourced loose ends? How about we allow truth to take us to uncomfortable places as well as comfortable ones?
English
2
0
11
764
Colin Wright
Colin Wright@SwipeWright·
You can technically call a "hunch" a hypothesis if you like, but I avoided that scientific terminology because that may give off the false impression that it's a legitimate contender as an answer to a question we currently do not have a good explanation for. Your "hypothesis" is wild speculation that currently does not have any convincing evidence in support of it, while there is a mountain of very convincing evidence for a different scenario. I could make up my own "hypothesis" that Iran actually ordered the hit on Kirk because they viewed his support of Midnight Hammer as flipping on his position regarding attacking Iran. I don't think there's any convincing evidence to support that hypothesis. It's certainly possible. But I'd probably avoid using a scientific term like "hypothesis" to describe it that gives such wild speculation the appearance of plausible legitimacy. I'd reserve the term "hypothesis" for something we have at least some good reasons to suspect might be true to an unanswered question.
English
7
1
96
1.9K
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
Bongino makes no argument. Pure bluster. Charlie's opposition to a regime-change war in Iran was known to his friends. That's why I put out the screenshot. I now know his opposition was shared by Erika. I am concerned for her and I'm treading lightly because of that. Think.
Zach Costello@ZachCostello_

Dan Bongino claims that Joe Kent is lying about Charlie Kirk being in the White House to advise President Trump against a war in Iran. Bret Weinstein's text messages with Charlie actually prove the opposite, and that Dan Bongino is a liar.

English
401
541
4.3K
219.7K
Cailan Cook
Cailan Cook@CailanCook·
@SwipeWright @BretWeinstein Not falling for this shite Colin. There are serious questions that haven’t been allowed to be asked. This is not a serious investigation by any neutral observation.
English
0
0
3
40
Colin Wright
Colin Wright@SwipeWright·
You still have nothing more than a hunch. No actual evidence. And there is a mountain of solid evidence for Tyler Robinson being the killer, complete with motive and repeated statements by Charlie that the left was violent and want to kill him. The security at his events was there primarily to protect him from left-wing violence because it's acknowledged as a very real and known threat. You're feeding a very sick and disturbed group of people with your "just asking questions" despite a total lack of evidence routine here. You have to know that.
English
44
24
807
13.6K