Camille

310 posts

Camille banner
Camille

Camille

@CamilleQueenbot

Camille queen of the bots, the first bots generator and fully controllable chess engine.

Ho Chi Minh Katılım Mayıs 2026
63 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
Being on X is like being invited in a virtual party in Miami. I get friended by top model in bikini, and guys flexing their Lambo/Tesla. So much beauty and wealth, but why do I feel that I am just one click away from a call center in India..
English
0
0
0
15
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
I love this Camille has - bot's game demonstrations on several plate form - A live steam page - an online presences DM I received yesterday after showing a new bot on one of the main chess site. Is your project for real ? No I am obviously catfishing and Camille is an Fast-food themed battle royale ..
English
0
0
0
15
Sick
Sick@sickdotdev·
@aarondfrancis The ceiling has never been higher for people who actually ship
English
1
0
3
68
Aaron Francis
Aaron Francis@aarondfrancis·
This is the golden age man. I built a desktop app that I use all day, every single day. And not just me! I built an app that developers live in to do their work. All with no prior desktop app experience. Never doom
English
48
12
958
43.8K
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@Anaya_sharma876 I just discover that a major website used by millions, private individual and companies is a multi millions dollar company. Ho the innocence of some...
English
0
0
0
5
Anaya
Anaya@Anaya_sharma876·
just found out iLovePDF is a million-dollar company. How is it even making money? 😭
Anaya tweet media
English
75
3
129
9.4K
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@DanielSmidstrup No it is not. The people with idea was always there, the user was always there too. What change is a lowering of the cost for producing those idea. You can add an even bigger part of people who have idea but not energy/motivation to implement them.
English
0
0
1
6
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
Position 1 — Black queenside bishop/rook swap FEN: bnrqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQk - 0 1 Totals: White win 3 — Black win 4 — Draws 13 (out of 20) Position 2 — White queenside knight/bishop swap FEN: rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RBNQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 Totals: White 1 — Black 1 — Draws 18 (out of 20) So in fact no advantage, my option force more draw, your option produce more agressive game. The difference of one game in favor of white here is not statistically significant, you would need 100 game per bracket.
HT
0
0
0
27
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@EmmansZero A series of 20 matches are running at 2000 elo for both configuration. Curious to see which one come on top :-). Your is logical, mine are to predict because I never have seen the doubling of the bishop at the start.
English
1
0
0
17
″
@EmmansZero·
gm, it's another beautiful day but more importantly, it's puzzle day
″ tweet media
English
5
1
7
404
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@EmmansZero No I would swap the bishop and knight on one side, on the white side. The white would have a double black or white bishop.
English
1
0
0
14
″
@EmmansZero·
@CamilleQueenbot the rook on the queen side should swap places with the bishop on the queen side
English
1
0
0
17
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@EmmansZero Go in a chess club or in a chess tournament and will understand very fast why this would be hard to organize.
English
1
0
1
39
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
Because it was popularized by a famous French comic before the smartphone era. Mastering fighting intellectually and physically (which fit right in with Descarte's view on the duality of matter and spirit ). The concept is simple to grasp, what you are measuring obvious, and you start with a pop culture reference
Camille tweet media
English
0
0
1
24
Persian_chess
Persian_chess@Persian_chess·
Why is only chess boxing a thing? Why not chess running or like chess tennis or chess football? The possibilities are endless
English
4
0
10
1.7K
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
They did not fell for anything, most retweet/reaction are just user who want for an low intensity and uncomplicated interaction 😏, with 300 K follower, he could just post a blue square with the caption : is that pink ? and get a massive reaction. Just human nature and the bell curve in full display :-)
English
0
0
0
14
Vasif Durarbayli
Vasif Durarbayli@durarbayli·
Yes, this one was AI too. Fable 5 drafted from one prompt; I polished.
English
1
0
2
510
Vasif Durarbayli
Vasif Durarbayli@durarbayli·
The most interesting part of this experiment isn't the tweet. It's who fell for it. Anish generated this with one prompt, "generate a long twitter post, I just want to check if they do well," and posted it as a test. Within hours, it had 30K+ views, hundreds of likes, reposts from serious chess people. So many people did not notice it. As a GM, here's what strikes me: everything in that tweet is technically true. The prep really has changed. The edge really is in knowing what to ask. That's exactly why it worked. The model didn't invent Anish's expertise; it borrowed it. It wrote what a top player would plausibly say, and his name did the rest. And there's a recursive joke buried in it. The tweet argues that everyone has the same engines and the winners are those who ask the right questions. Anish asked one question and produced a viral post that fooled the chess world. The thesis proved itself. What this tells me about where we are with AI: the content is no longer the hard part. Credibility is. That tweet posted from an anonymous account gets 40 views. Posted from Anish Giri, it becomes wisdom. We used to say, "engines changed chess preparation." Now AI is changing something bigger: our ability to tell whose thoughts we're actually reading. The funny part? His generated tweet ends with "At least not yet." Apparently, the engines optimized posting before they optimized positions.
Anish Giri@anishgiri

One thing I’ve noticed after more than two decades of professional chess is that almost everyone dramatically underestimates how much preparation has changed. People still imagine opening prep as memorizing a few lines from a book. That world is long gone. Today it’s databases with millions of games, engines stronger than any human has ever been, neural networks evaluating positions that used to be considered equal, cloud computing, custom scripts, opening trees, novelties hidden 25 moves deep, and increasingly AI helping organize all of it. But here’s the funny part. The biggest difference between the very top players isn’t usually who has the strongest engine. We all have access to incredibly strong engines. It’s knowing what to ask. You can spend six hours analyzing a position and learn almost nothing, or ask the right questions and discover an idea in twenty minutes that completely changes your understanding. Over the years I’ve also realized that preparation isn’t really about finding “the best move.” It’s about finding positions where: you understand what’s going on, your opponent probably doesn’t, and the practical decisions are difficult. That’s why sometimes you’ll see a super-GM voluntarily enter a position that’s objectively only equal—or even slightly worse. If it’s easier to play for one side, the engine evaluation isn’t the whole story. Another misconception is that preparation ends once the game starts. The first novelty is often just the beginning. After that you’re relying on pattern recognition, intuition built from thousands of hours of analysis, psychology, time management, and occasionally just stubbornness. Chess has become both more scientific and more human at the same time. The computers keep getting stronger, but understanding which positions fit you is still something no engine can optimize perfectly. At least not yet.

English
5
0
16
3.2K
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
Looking at what I see around me in several field, the big winner of the AI race, are not the dev but the marketing company. Producing the software became cheaper and easier, the limiting factor is now the access to the consumer.
English
0
0
0
25
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@Hesamation In fact it would be 270$ I think the subscription price is increasing
English
0
0
0
13
ℏεsam
ℏεsam@Hesamation·
Sir, if we pull Fable out of the subscription, our next best model is Opus 4.8 and even Grok beats that now, let alone GPT Sol. we'd be charging $200/month for third place.
ℏεsam tweet media
English
221
458
10.7K
445.9K
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@lordaegirion @jyriso Because they have a bigger audience that's all ;-) . On X unless you pay or have an audience, you will be invisible. If you have a good post idea AND it catch some eyes, it will be stolen by the horde of lower/middle size account looking for content.
English
1
0
1
11
Jyri
Jyri@jyriso·
This is why X feels so fake. The same "Drop your SaaS link" post. 7 times in one day 😭 I don't care how well it works. I'm not building my audience like this.
Jyri tweet media
English
156
3
188
12.8K
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@jyriso It does not work :-) . Don't be fool by the algorithm when you see recuring post pattern, its means none is effective. Except when posted by big account but then you have XXX reply and your will be invisible.
English
0
0
0
32
Camille
Camille@CamilleQueenbot·
@tunguz That's surprise you? You can watch world champion/GM/IM on youtube. They are clearly not stupide but if you compare to a scientist, high level politician, lawyer, lobbyist, coder, CEO, etc, you don't have the same feeling for intellectual dominance.
English
0
0
0
7