
CanWePrevail
887 posts










Labour plans to withhold benefits to people who have been granted Indefinite Leave to Remain. Performative cruelty and total cowardice. That’s why the Greens will replace Labour.




🚨NEW: A 24-year-old woman has died after being stabbed in West London








Scoop: Andy Burnham will vote FOR Shabana Mahmood's immigration crackdown in the Commons tonight. Dozens of Labour MPs had written to him urging him to water down the Immigration and Asylum Bill, warning the party is “losing progressive voters”. But a spokesperson tells HuffPost UK: "This Bill takes important steps towards restoring confidence by tackling illegal crossings while strengthening safe and legal routes for genuine refugees. "This is about ensuring the system is fair both to those seeking protection and to the communities that welcome them." Story 👇 huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/andy-bur…

Labour had one last card to play. That after Keir Starmer they could find themselves a progressive leader. We're speed running crash and burn faster than anyone could have imagined. We're building the alternative of hope with a plan to replace Labour. Join.greenparty.org.uk


🚨JUST IN: Andy Burnham will give 1.6 million Boriswave migrants indefinite leave to remain after 5 years instead of 10 to appease the far left of the party following a back bench rebellion to Shabana Mahmood's plans. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…





Exclusive from @matt_dathan The Home Office has drawn up plans to relax immigration reforms in a bid to address the concerns of Labour MPs Under a compromise up to 1.6 million migrants could be granted indefinite leave to remain after five years instead of ten — but they would face waiting longer to qualify for benefits The group known as the Boriswave after the boom in immigration under Boris Johnson would be exempted from Mahmood's migration reforms but have to wait longer before accessing benefits such as UC, disability payments, council tax reduction, tax credits and state pension credits A source said: “What it boils down to is benefits. You would allow them to get ILR after five years but you don’t allow them to claim benefits until three or four years later.” They said “most people don’t come here so they can claim benefits”, but the idea that they can do so “as soon as they get ILR” was “politically damaging”. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…













