螺螄粉安撫查訪使

2.3K posts

螺螄粉安撫查訪使 banner
螺螄粉安撫查訪使

螺螄粉安撫查訪使

@CarelessLord

Mailing Member of the Communist League of the People's Republic of Rome, Head of the Latte Division of the Atheist Society in the Great Song Empire

Katılım Aralık 2020
20 Takip Edilen47 Takipçiler
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@Chives_AD ASMONG自己交过亚裔娃娃脸女友,和emiru认识……Overcompensating game,对于这些右派来说,没有风险和代价,指控他人“恋童癖”,即便事后证明不是,他们也会因为“过度反应”的理由而获得赦免。 他们的做法和其对立面没有任何区别,Gamer Gate 右派版。 youtube.com/watch?v=MlU9HD…
YouTube video
YouTube
中文
0
0
1
158
🍦✨Chives_AD 🇺🇸 🇦🇷✨🍨 🔞
@CarelessLord That is true. There are highly religious larpers on the right who panic at anything slightly cute and call it "pedophilia". They are almost as annoying as 白左. I think "TradCaths" are less threatening since they do not occupy our corporations, our media, or public institutions
English
1
0
0
14
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@JohnHemmings2 @victimsofz66265 @PhilipIngMBE “被命令干这个干那个”,基于一些“据说”的主流媒体报道。 BTW,特朗普直接发推特命令美国甚至其他国家的公司干这个干那个。更不用说,与情报部门、军队合作最密切的公司,就是美国的。 而美国司法部甚至从未就这些指控打赢过任何一场完美的诉讼。
中文
0
0
0
24
John Hemmings
John Hemmings@JohnHemmings2·
Hikvision is part owned by the PRC & supplies 60% of UK public bodies w CCTV cameras. Cameras from Hikvision & Dahua are in 73% of local authorities, 35% of police forces, and 63% of schools in the UK. This is a huge problem which no one is talking about. ft.com/content/6f4d80…
English
26
159
393
35.4K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@CJLeung_DST OP显然并不是在期待下一个霸主,而是认为“中国成为不了下一个霸主,所以还是服从现在这个霸主”,因为“英语比汉语更流行”。
中文
1
0
0
33
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@Chives_AD @KingofBeasts89 蟑螂之王肯定不是白左,一些白右并不讨厌可爱又漂亮的女性角色,但他们对爱泼斯坦文件过于恐慌,他们在寻找各种目标纳投名状,用尴尬的道德表演,证明自己不是“爱泼斯坦的朋友”。
中文
1
0
1
17
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@ricw410 @tigerlau1221 @Sukiyonio 修正:发达的殖民主义国家很少发生大饥荒。 1、发达的殖民主义国家会把饥民提前赶到海外,让他们饿死在海外。 2、发达的殖民主义国家的殖民地里,殖民者不会饿死,饿死的都是被殖民人民。 3、发达的殖民主义国家,用殖民地的民脂民膏,在本土创建“民主”的主题乐园,让本土穷人都能乐在其中。
中文
0
0
0
140
毛岸英
毛岸英@Sukiyonio·
全世界有一个共产党国家没有发生过大饥荒么?
中文
40
2
96
12K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@Yussoonn_ 21世纪的跨国资产阶级,会越来越强调自己对帝国的忠诚,厌恶本国的无产阶级和民族资产阶级。 罗莎·卢森堡,一直是正确的。
螺螄粉安撫查訪使 tweet media螺螄粉安撫查訪使 tweet media
中文
1
0
13
1.4K
류승일
류승일@Yussoonn_·
서구에 사는 동아시아 출신 페미니스트들은 자기 공동체의 남자들과 자기 문화를 혐오한 나머지, 이런 식으로 식민지 시대부터 이어져 온 인종차별적 주장을 퍼뜨리곤 해. 아프리카계 페미니스트나 백인 페미니스트, 심지어 아랍 국가 출신 페미니스트들도 자기네 남자들을 비판하긴 하지만 인종적 고정관념을 일반화해서 퍼뜨리는 경우는 거의 없지. 그런데 유독 아시아 여성들 사이에서만 그런 경향이 두드러진다는 게 참 아이러니하지.
난난@nannan_ing

원래 작으면 콘돔이 헐렁해서 안맞음

한국어
36
41
580
50K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@qmxad90 @OopsGuess 为什么是1894年?中国的领土又不是1894年突然确定的。 南海最近一次确定主权归属,就是归属给了中国,不管是1894年,还是1911年。
中文
0
0
0
9
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦
Nine-dash line, ten-dash line, eleven-dash line — the number is not the point. The point is this: China was already too restrained for too long. Japan and the Philippines originally thought they could sit down and discuss how to divide up China's sovereign territorial waters, while Washington’s little think-tank clerks cheered from the side. Then China showed up. Suddenly it is “expansionism.” Suddenly it is “gray-zone tactics.” Suddenly everyone remembers international law. Please. If Tokyo and Manila want to redraw maps at China’s doorstep, they should not act shocked when China redraws the operating space around them. The lesson is very simple: the more you internationalize Taiwan, the more China normalizes its presence around Taiwan. The more you drag Japan and the Philippines into the game, the more China expands the board. The more you provoke, the tighter the strategic noose becomes. You wanted to test China’s red line. China moved the line outward.
SeaLight@SeaLightFound

🚨THE BASHI BREAKOUT: 🇨🇳#China has, for the first time, pushed a paramilitary sovereignty assertion past its own "10-dash line" & beyond the First Island Chain to challenge a maritime negotiation it isn't party to. On May 28, 🇯🇵#Japan & the 🇵🇭#Philippines announced they would delimit their overlapping exclusive economic zones as prescribed by #UNCLOS. Beijing's answer was to send a flotilla through the Bashi Channel & into the open Pacific east of 🇹🇼#Taiwan, into waters that even its own most expansive maps don't (yet) claim. The key is in which ships Beijing sent: China uses its navy to assert capability--what it can do by force. It uses its coast guard & other government ships as a paramilitary force to assert sovereignty--what it claims. Not one ship in this flotilla was a warship, because this was a sovereignty claim. That's what's really new here. For over a decade China used these same gray-zone tactics to assert sovereignty inside its South China Sea "nine-dash line". This week's action pushed somewhere new--going past even the 10th "dash" Beijing added to its 2023 map. Beyond the First Island Chain. This assertion was aimed not at Taiwan alone, but at two 🇺🇸US treaty allies. @China_MFA branded the Japan-Philippine talks "completely illegal and void", while a June 1 @globaltimesnews editorial called the idea "an extraordinary and almost unprecedented absurdity… akin to two neighbors sitting in your living room and discussing how to divide your backyard." Note how China's "backyard" continues to expand. So, in fact, does its "living room". What SeaLight's tracking shows: 🔹 From 1-5 June, CCG cutters Daishan (2502) & Baita (2304) ran the first clockwise patrol over 200nm east of Taiwan's easternmost island--well past the 10th "dash" on Beijing's 2023 map. 🔹 Late on June 7th, a second wave of 3 provincial Maritime Safety Administration cutters & a rescue tug pushed into the Bashi Channel. The formation entered Taiwan's restricted waters ~30nm off the southern tip, drew a 7-ship Taiwan Coast Guard standoff, then also pushed east. Beijing's state media left no doubt about what it all meant, first with an official @XHNews/@globaltimesnews announcement, then a June 7 Global Times viewpoint column naming the operation "a sovereignty declaration with both legal significance and political signaling." Taiwan's NSC chief @josephwutw named it "expansionism in disguise," Defense Minister Koo said it was "cognitive warfare." Both are quite correct. But the deeper target is Tokyo, Manila & Washington DC, since if Beijing can run a paramilitary sovereignty assertion directly against two US allies' lawful EEZ talks in waters far beyond even its own claim lines, the real message is that China's maritime claims are not just expansive and ambiguous, they are unbounded. 📊 Tracking by @StarboardIntel

English
21
67
433
38.9K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@KuittinenPetri @sharghzadeh 1、流行音乐不需要语言完全契合旋律,流行榜上不乏填词差的好作品。 2、普通话音调问题确实存在。 3、补救音调的办法有的是,“引入英语”纯粹是你作为西方白人的本位主义。
中文
1
0
0
41
Petri Kuittinen
Petri Kuittinen@KuittinenPetri·
The Mandarin problem also applies to popular music. Standard Mandarin has only about 400 distinct syllables without tones, and roughly 1,200 to 1,300 when incorporating its four lexical tones and neutral tone. Only one tone is downwards in pitch, making it extremely hard even for native speakers to write good song lyrics in certain genres, where you typically want the melody go down in pitch in the chorus lines. One way to solve this is to use English in the chorus, but the most common solution is to write ballads as it doesn't matter that much in that genre. And indeed ballads are overwhelmingly popular in Chinese music, but those songs often lack the global appeal. They are not like K-Pop or J-pop which are listened also in the West, despite the obvious and heavy language barrier. PS. My Chinese sucks, but I am pushing myself to limits by writing song lyrics in lots of different languages. I think I have nailed to write couple of good fast rock/pop songs and rap / hip hop in Mandarin Chinese. It is far easier to achieve the same in lyrics in English, Finnish, Swedish or whatever European language comes to mind.
English
7
0
16
2.5K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@CCantonii @sharghzadeh 错了,3000个汉字不是3000个单词。 汉字也不是纯象形文字,而是“Logo-syllabic script”,用“糟糕”只能说明你的无知,你没有资格对此做出评价。
中文
0
0
0
73
CJ Canton 🇺🇸🇺🇦
@sharghzadeh The problem is that Chinese characters are just a terrible writing system. It's very similar to hieroglyphics, it was revolutionary when it came out but at this point the lift for an adult learner of 3000 hanzi is too much for people with jobs. The grammar by comparison is simple
English
14
1
63
8.6K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@sharghzadeh 1、中国不需要语言霸权和任何霸权。 2、中国经济的崛起,对于学习中文,会有越来越多的附带效益。 3、中国人不想,也不需要,通过让中文成为其他民族的“第二语言”来证明自己的软实力,只要能沟通就行了。 4、“普通话”只是汉语的一种。 所以,中国不存在语言传播的焦虑,没有“普通话”问题这个东西。
中文
0
0
0
18
Pseudo-Academic
Pseudo-Academic@pdfhoarding·
Really weird to think about how if Taiwan was never demographically dominated by Han Chinese just about 200 years ago, we would consider it consider it a part of South East Asia today like the Phillippines, and not an East Asian country like China.
Pseudo-Academic tweet media
English
62
113
2.4K
102.8K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@pdfhoarding 台湾不是因为种族的原因才成为清王朝的一部分。贵州和广西,有大量的苗族、彝族、壮族,这些省份的土司政权,很多保留到了1949年,没有人会因其族属而将之视为东南亚的一部分。
中文
0
0
0
98
Yorch Torch Games
Yorch Torch Games@YorchTorchGames·
Could somebody teach Vee how to take a screenshot and configure his browser to check up-to-date dislikes? They keep growing, and growing and growing and growing... Shift Up divided the fan base by making the terrible mistake of replacing Eve with 'Evie'.
Yorch Torch Games tweet media
Vee@not__vee

@YorchTorchGames

English
27
1
26
10.3K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@Frauwoo @02trollking 远祖有鲜卑族血统,军队、政府以汉族为主体,建立汉族王朝,以汉语为国语,推崇汉族文化。 如果有这么一个祖上是“朝鲜族”的唐朝完全统治朝鲜半岛,你愿意么?
中文
0
0
3
227
🕊입동에 핀 차꽃
@02trollking 수나라와 당나라 집권세력은 한족이 아니라 <선비족>이죠. 선비족의 나라. 한족의 나라가 아니죠 ㅎㅎ
한국어
18
0
3
1.9K
괴물왕
괴물왕@02trollking·
당나라는 다른 황제랑 다르게 허리 펴고 딱 벨트잡고 있는 저 상남자스러운 자세가 매력인듯
괴물왕 tweet media
한국어
21
20
212
18.8K
螺螄粉安撫查訪使
螺螄粉安撫查訪使@CarelessLord·
@Corrine250618 @wuerbangbang 文化上的右倾投降主义,在文化定义权和反对极端民族主义的斗争中,对日韩主张妥协忽视,只顾着“订正”国人错误。 这不胡适嘛。
中文
0
0
7
104
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 🫧
你这是什么混账逻辑? 麻烦你为日韩偷中国古代遗产洗地也有点水平。 表面好像“中立”分析,文字里偷偷把中华文明母体洗成东亚共享仓库。 青铜、小麦从西亚传入中国,没人说中国是西亚文明分支;但汉字、典籍、制度、茶道、佛教汉译体系、礼仪审美从中国流向日韩,马上就变成“各美其美”“文化大池子”。 流氓文痞真是很会偷换概念。 文化传播当然存在。 但传播不等于源头消失,学习不等于平级共享,二次加工不等于反过来抹掉母体。 日本的问题从来不是“模仿过中国”。 问题是抄完、拿走、包装、改名,然后装成东方文明代表; 更恶心的是,被指出源头时,还要反咬中国“民族主义”。 所有文明的消亡,往往不是从屠杀开始,而是从历史被改写开始。 中国人拒绝自己的文明遗产被偷,还要被一些慕洋殖物要求假装那叫“共同财产”,有什么问题? “各美其美”?你先把源头说清楚。 没有中华文明这个母体,很多所谓“东亚传统”连字都写不出来。 最搞笑的是什么? bio写着 北大中文本硕。 民俗学博士。 博物馆前馆员。 文史艺术旅游爱好者。 然后得出的结论是: 中国文明母体不重要,东亚文化都是一个池子里大家随便舀。 真不知道这是哪个野鸡大学培养出来的“学术”: 可以把“源头”稀释成“氛围”,把“传承路径”洗成“大家都有份”。 真正有文明底蕴的人不会不懂所有文明都会溯源 只有那些急着显摆自己得“开明”“中立”“不民族主义”的伪君子,才会把自己母国作为文明母体的历史位置一点点磨平,最后端出一句漂亮废话: “各美其美,美美与共。” 你当然可以各美其美, 但前提是,你没资格把中国古代的母体文明拆成公共装修材料。
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 🫧 tweet media
中文
8
13
108
10.1K
吴二棒
吴二棒@wuerbangbang·
我真的搞不懂为什么中日韩那么多网友把正常的文明交流互鉴定义为“偷”……一会儿中国说韩国偷韩服,一会儿日本说中国偷抹茶。这些历史上都是正大光明学习的,何偷之有?难道非本地起源就算“偷”?众所周知青铜和小麦是西亚传到中国的,是不是也是偷?当大爹就那么爽? 历史上有没有真的“偷”呢?当然有。于阗公主将中国严禁出口的蚕茧藏进头冠带到西域,打破了中国人的垄断;明代陈振龙把菲律宾严禁出口的红薯藤缠到缆绳上带回中国,从此中国人吃上了红薯。这两个不论从当时还是现在的角度,都几乎是严格定义上的偷。但我在博物馆和书上看到的都是中立叙述前者,而大加赞美后者。——你不能在自己是既得利益者时才说自己不是“偷”。 东亚文化很多东西确实起源于中国,但后来失传了,以至于在讲民族自豪和复兴传统的今天,中国人又跟日韩取经,完了再安个语焉不详的古籍记载,说咱这就是按古籍复原的。接触过相关行业的应该知道,我这说的不是孤例。民俗学家阿兰·邓迪斯有个“传统池”的概念,大概是说每个民族有个传统文化的大池子,不停被活水或快或慢地更替。这池子不用时闲置在那没人管,要的时候舀起一瓢(同时有可能夹带私货)就说这“自古以来”。文化从来不是均质单一的,变化才是常态。 所以我又要举起费孝通先生的十六字真言了:“各美其美,美人之美。美美与共,天下大同。”东亚的民族主义者们,你们可否心胸开阔一些?
Genpo Liu@Clapton_Free

日本人真是无知,无耻到极致。 偷汉字,偷草书,现在连抹茶都要偷走。 自己上维基百科看看抹茶源于中国。 日本的抹茶低产,低质,还恬不知耻的卖高价。 中国一定要把整个产业端走,日本国内那些破茶还是日本人自己喝吧。

中文
230
836
3.6K
681.6K